btw, i'm looking at getting a 1995 Q45
greg_atlanta wrote:Definitely more pros then cons for the '95 model... very reliable engine and transmission.
Your ownership experience largely depends on what has or has not been fixed previosly. Are you buying from dealer or individual?
It's entirely possible for a '95 Q with around 100K miles to have had little or no work done other than routine fluid changes. If that's the case, you could spend $4-5K in the first year fixing things. But it'll still be better than 95% of new cars on the road today.
We really need more info to give a good recommendation. Yes, it's more expensive than a Honda or Toyota, but a lot cheaper to maintain than a Lexus, MB, BMW, Audi, etc.
What cars have you had before?
funny, kinda what i'm hoping for...i'm tired of changing cars every yeargreg_atlanta wrote:Beware: you might not like American cars anymore after the Q45!
fxjackso wrote:Other-
Parse these replies differently. We are trying to tell you that your 95 will more than likely need $2-4,000 of repairs the minute you drive it off the lot. Once you accomplish that, it will cost $2-3,000 a year to maintain in top shape. For that , you get a car that performs in the top 5% of everything on the road, regardless of age.
So, when considering the purchase, you may consider your total cash investment, some of which you say you will finance, over say a three year period, to be $16-18,000. That does not include interest. If that's not a number you are comfortable with, the Q will not make you happy. If it is, you are in for a treat.
Try a bank or credit union rather than getting financing from a dealer, it could save some costs. Good luck and we hope to see you around here.
fxjackso wrote:Repo Man-
Keep quiet or some other member is going to scoop that one up from under you. It seems even nicer than my 1990 (as I bought it) and yes, it looks very well maintained, although you and I might have changed the oil by the calendar with so few miles put on it. Also, I see a big difference underneath from living in Ohio vs Houston. Nice that snow tires come with.
But good (? NAPA-no opinion here) brakes wear out by 25-30,000 miles, and so do the links, sway bar rubber, etc. You will use Nissan fuel/air/oil filters, flush the trans and radiator frequently, because you know you should. Rotors will warp, even drilled ones, under 10,000. Those almost new tires are too small for the size of the car, and will wear quickly, and 17" tires in the right size are not cheap. Put yourself down for the low end of maintenance, and hope the trans-probably replaced in the campaign for 1991's, holds up.
You are going to want JWT chips for the engine and trans, a rear sway bar, stainless brake lines, etc. so use the money you don't spend on repairs for them! I hope you buy that car, a NICO member should be driving it.
i understand that i'm not gonna be disuaded by most in this club...but i was responding to the post above mine stating that if i had to finance it, i shouldn't get it because you have to have so much in 'reserve' for 'off the lot' repairs.DAEDALUS wrote:Part price ballpark figures:upper links $200rear suspension links $450struts $320O2 sensors $200suspension rubber $300under-plenum hoses $230injectors $140 eachspark plugs $100/setknock sensors $280rotors $200brake pads/hardware $160tires $600fuel pump $235alternator $225battery $70chain guides (90-93) $500 partswater pump $90radiator $400fan $100tranny $1800
Some labor ballparks:chain guides (90-93) $700 valve cover gaskets $500 4 strut assembly rebuilds $350Brakes $250tranny $1200
I could go on, of course. The_Other, fxjackso is right. We're NOT trying to dissuade you from buying a Q. They are great cars. We're glad we bought them and many of us would buy another if we had to. But most of us were more than a bit surprised at the upkeep and maintenance costs associated with ownership. Obviously, we think it's worth it, or we wouldn't be here. If you end up getting a Q, you will have a very knowledgeable and supportive club here to congratulate you on your purchase and to answer any questions you might have in the future.
Mutually exclusive -- if it had "impeccable maintenance," it wouldn't need a "dealer-built engine" at less than 100,000 miles. No two ways about that! What happened?repo man wrote:a new, Infiniti-dealer built engine, impeccable maintenance over it's 98,000 or so miles
landtodd wrote:Mutually exclusive -- if it had "impeccable maintenance," it wouldn't need a "dealer-built engine" at less than 100,000 miles. No two ways about that! What happened?
The "dealer-built engine" is cause for concern, too. Almost no gen-1 Q45 is worth a complete rebuild, and few dealers have the ability or interest to do it right. Maybe they mean a "dealer-installed take-out motor?" Much more likely.
That said, you've got to roll the dice on something. Compared to that list of American cars, this sounds like a gamble I would take! Best of luck!
palmerwmd wrote:repoman,
I would buy that car,many say they woudl prefer a low mile jap takeout over a rebuild.
But it does appear that everything possible was done.
Landtodd:
Like repo said, the engine going, doesn't mean the car wasn't well maintained,( those pesky guides, good thing the new design guides are in from 94 model year on onwards and the parts can be put in the older cars).
Fred...![]()
repo man wrote:The engine was built from a NuCore Q45 engine core. It was $450 for the core and the rebuild cost nearly $4500. Was this not the right way to do it?
q45tech wrote:Re: Q w/223k q45tech (53/M/Atlanta, GA) 6/22/01 7:53 pm
"Why rebuild since the two I know haven't been able to duplicate the factory precision. The best one took 85 hours at $70 plus parts= $9050 plus removal and reinstall it turned into a $12,000 job] When you start talking about 3 ten thousands of an inch fits most run away. We have found that it's less expensive to just find a good japanese take out engine [$2,600-$3,000] and swap $3,000.
Re: Harder to find 90-93 engines q45tech (52/M/Atlanta, GA) 1/30/01 8:01 am
". . . IF we could find someone to properly rebuild a Q motor with a 2 year warranty you could expect similar costs say around $11,500 plus tax....why most people opt for a $7000 used take out engine job with a 12/12k warranty . . .
Harder to find 90-93 engines q45tech (52/M/Atlanta, GA) 1/30/01 7:02 am
With all the owners trashing their engines due to poor oil habits, overheating, and chain guides, it is getting more and more difficult to find decent used takeout engines. From pristine 2 years ago to mostly junk now ....more than 50% were receive are returned due to problems now. Many sources are trying to palm off [or don't know any better] dirty used US engines as Japanese take outs. $3,000 can get a decent one but you must always check and change the chain guides with in/out labor and changing things [new hoses harnesses etc] it takes 3 days so the price will be approching $7000 for the job minimum. Please keep your engine clean and in tip top condition I hate to see people cry . . .
Re: What about Engine Oil FLUSH ? q45tech (53/M/Atlanta, GA) 11/21/01 9:00 am
We have only rebuilt 4 Q engines completely/totally from the block up, other than swapping new/used heads on a bad block or the converse, changed a few rods/pistons etc. Generally the [matched] parts availability is spotty and time consumming plus the time required makes it uneconomical vs paying $2500 for a take out [upon which you have to do $1500 to make it safe]....no way to get all the parts and spent 48-60 hours it would cost $7,000.....microfinishing the crank [new special bearings] or replacing it is $1500 alone.....then why rebuild if you don't replace the rods, springs, valves, seats, rings, pistons, pins etc then you have to hone the block. Obviously changing 25 engines doesn't make us an expert but pretty close at least on understanding what costs are.
The_Other wrote:i have to finance the car because i just lost my previous one and haven't had time to save up $6000 - $7500, sorry bout that. not everyone has a stash to jump into when a new car is needed. i make more than enough to cover costs of repairs as they come up.
greg_atlanta wrote:Nothing wrong with financing a used car purchase!! (provided the interest rate is reasonable)
Everyone manages their money differently. I've kept my Q on the road thanks to Amex, Visa, MC, etc. Now that the car's paid for the credit card bills are getting some more attention.
The nice thing about any Japanese car is that you can postpone repairs -- they take a beating!
Most of us on this site are perfectionists, but some (like me) have successfully balanced perfectionism with budget concerns.