HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!urcaptnspeaking wrote:As far as the " I buy name brand only comment" Let me give you some insight:
Ever heard of a Gibson Les Paul?? well if not its a guitar.. Gibson endorses a company called Epiphone who also produces a Les Paul of the basic same quality.Now you can go out and pay over 1000 for the Gibson or indeed by the Epiphone, which through an amp, sounds identical for $450..
I just picked the POD up for personal use and use it sometimes when we gig, my bandmember deals with all the recording stuff but we don't have much recorded as our equipment would not do us justice.Tulsa_S-13 wrote:If you guys want to argue you should do it through email, not on the boards.
I disagree about the Epiphone and Gibson comment.
I've been playing for quite awhile myself and have personally found that some lower line Gibsons are finished off with little effort from the manufacturer. I'm talking about fret ends not being smoothed, etc. Although a lot of time it's a matter of it not being set up properly.
I've found some pretty poor playing Gibsons and some great playing Epiphones.
And just to thread jack even further.
The Line6 POD is possibly the most overhyped amp modulator out there. I find most of their patches flat and lacking in a full sound. Oh man, and when it comes to recording, Line6s do not cut through the mix like the Mesa Boogie.
Valve > Solid State
He said in another, or this thread, that he was getting it from his girlfriends Mom or something.srpowered240sx wrote:how are you getting money for your grandmas house? if you dont mind me asking.
He knew I liked 350's a lot so he surprised me with one, I personally would not have enough money to mod a Mercedes...who would want to any ways. And FYI he spends a lot of the money paying off our house and we just put a 3,000sq/ft addition on not to mention we have two houses one in FL one up here...idiot.Jadesr20det wrote:I think that your post screams ignorance and classic ricer attitude...no one has a problem with somone expressing their opinion u went on a personal attack tirade on the OP an NICO.....heres is a tip no one is impressed with your whole 18 posts nor the fact that you lie about playing guitar or that you father makes 400k and bought u a lowly 350z for a grad present he must really love you (where's the mercedes??)....neways yes you probably will be banned eventually and no one will care but you you will change your screen name re-register and learn to act accordingly....until then take your sorry *** over to zilvia where ur kind belongs.....ps enjoy the red squares over there lol.......sorry to OP but this guy was getting annoying
Dont talk down to me like Im some music noob. I have a CD with my band in every Virgin , Target, and FYE in the country so I do know gear and I know music. I said "BASICALLY" the difference is virtually hard to tell unless you are an avid player. Yes there is a difference (referring back to when I said BASICALLY) the difference lies in the pickups you swap in the same pickups and you have the same sound for less money. Yeah the wood is different, but wont effect the sound much through an amp. You play a line 6.. an over-effects using head that drowns out any tone anyways. Although I no longer have my set up cuz Im just a front man now, my fellow band mates use the jcm 900 with 69 marshall 4x12 cab and the other being a jcm 800 same setup. My band is now endorsed by Michael Kelly guitars so we dont much use the Epiphones/Gibsons any more... But on stage the tone difference is VIRTUALLY unnoticeable.Nismo350z wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!
Don't even try to tell me that a crappy Epiphone Les Paul will sound the same as a Gibson! I have playing guitar for 15 years kid and I currently own two Les Pauls and a Angus Young SG and play them all through a Line 6 POD hooked up to a Marshall 1/2 Stack for practicing, I have a full stack for gigs. Almost ALL of my friends have Epiphones and I myself have played many at Guitar Center and NONE of them compare to a Gibson. None of them have the tone, the sound, the quality that an American made Gibson has.
Please, do not speak on issues that you know nothing about. I am guessing that you just started playing and this is what the guy at Guitar Center told you just to sell you a guitar. I do not blame you if you are new to playing and believed some idiot at GC looking to make a sale, but come on an Epiphone is the exact same as a Gibson??? Get Real...
.
You MAY get close to the same sound, but you will not get close to the same quality as a Gibson guitar. Epiphones are basically chinese Gibsons, they don't have the quality an American Gibson does. And here you go saying you need to swap out the pickups to make them sound like a Gibson...you never said that before. So why are you all of a sudden changing your words?urcaptnspeaking wrote:
Dont talk down to me like Im some music noob. I have a CD with my band in every Virgin , Target, and FYE in the country so I do know gear and I know music. I said "BASICALLY" the difference is virtually hard to tell unless you are an avid player. Yes there is a difference (referring back to when I said BASICALLY) the difference lies in the pickups you swap in the same pickups and you have the same sound for less money. Yeah the wood is different, but wont effect the sound much through an amp. You play a line 6.. an over-effects using head that drowns out any tone anyways. Although I no longer have my set up cuz Im just a front man now, my fellow band mates use the jcm 900 with 69 marshall 4x12 cab and the other being a jcm 800 same setup. My band is now endorsed by Michael Kelly guitars so we dont much use the Epiphones/Gibsons any more... But on stage the tone difference is VIRTUALLY unnoticeable.
so before you try and make me look "dumb" know who you are talking to, I didnt get to where I am by not knowing **** bro. Oh and If you think IM lying.. Ill back it up with ANY proof you need of ANY of what I just said.
EDIT: I wasnt trying to thread jack the guitar comment originated when i was making a comparison of quality nothing more. And the above was to him trying to make me look like an idiot. I wasnt being a d!ck to any one I was just stating, but it seems like you cant say **** without some idiot calling you a dumbass.. sad.
I already told you I pay for my own parts.s13gebala wrote:nismo350z, ur a dumb mother8ucker
this guy just wanted to make an 240sx mostly from ebay parts, and to be helpful to the people on nico.
go suck on ur dads wang some more, and beg him for some more parts
Nismo350z wrote:
I already told you I pay for my own parts.
Shouldn't you be driving your P.O.S. 240 somewhere?
WOW!!!!! I'd think twice b4 talking **** about people's 240's on a 240sx forum.Nismo350z wrote:
I already told you I pay for my own parts.
Shouldn't you be driving your P.O.S. 240 somewhere?
+1 I relate to this thread also but all my ebay sh1t is holdin upken240sx wrote:So this is why I buy Ebay LOL, and support this thread. I would donate money and parts if I could, but the only thing I'd have to offer is my time...and a difference of location stops me from that. So I'll just keep supporting it and defending it as if it were my own project.
As slo_coupe would put it, Our 240s were "built, not bought" maybe you should take your pos z and drive off a cliff. I might add not all Zs are a pos, just yoursNismo350z wrote:
I already told you I pay for my own parts.
Shouldn't you be driving your P.O.S. 240 somewhere?
lol for the record your car would not smoke a twin turbo z.heartofaskyline wrote:hey i bought food and furniture for the house my parents bought me when i graduated haha. really though bryan hawking is a ****ing douche bag. and my piece of **** 240 will smoke your tt z. so suck my balls
Nice, so you are really a FAT kid who owns a 1988 Mustang 5.0 that barely drives and you have a HATE ON for anyone who drives a Japanese made car...Nismo350z wrote:
lol for the record your car would not smoke a twin turbo z.
And also for the record, you guys must not recognize a troll when you see one.
I am not from Naples, I don't have a TT350z, I do not own any of the said guitars, and I do not give a **** what all of you said.
All I know is that I myself made this thread grow to double of what it was in the past 2 days just by my posts alone.
And that makes me happy that I can get sand in your ricer vagina's so easily.
Have fun driving your slow cars.
You guys hit the 13's yet?
lol fat I think not, 165 at 6' tall is not fat by any means.Cory_Marshall wrote:
Nice, so you are really a FAT kid who owns a 1988 Mustang 5.0 that barely drives and you have a HATE ON for anyone who drives a Japanese made car...
Beat it kid..OBVIOUSLY you had an INTEREST in the Nissan 240SX or you wouldn't have been here in the FIRST PLACE...
PATHETIC..