To outright say that there is no need for it is not necessarily true. Some places do not allow any modification to your car's emissions system so removing it would constitute a violation in those states and cause the vehicle to fail inspection.smithersbpr wrote:i punched my 3rd cat out. there is no need for it.
BamaCoupe wrote:A cow fart is just as harmful to the environment as the difference between a car without a cat then a car with a cat, so what are we going to do, kill the cows? Sorry, I'm just sick of hearing about this global warming BS.
...I think a lot of people don't realize that catalytic converters actually add harmful toxins to the environment. Think about it...sure you've got all these nasty hydrocarbons that are leaving your engine and the cat takes care of them. But what's the other side of that equation? What do you think come out the other end of the tailpipe? Fresh air and kittens? Hell no...it's carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide (two of the main toxins which "scientists" point their fingers at when warning about global warming). There are a number of people and organizations that are trying to change the current regulations regarding the necessity of catalytic converters. That being said, I (like BamaCoupe) am sick of the whole "eco-friendly" crap. Petrol engines are on their way out...it's up to the auto industry to adapt to that. /rantmrodrig2 wrote:
No one mentioned global warming... and just because you don't believe in the issue doesn't exclude others from caring about it. I'm not espousing either side, merely presenting that the cat was put there for a purpose and is not useless as the person I replied to stated.
ill quote this post, but could have quoted all of themmrodrig2 wrote:So you are telling me you'd rather have your car emit CO rather than CO2 that can be processed by plants...? And the reason many cars have multiple cats is because one is a traditional cat that might result in N2O but down-line cats may be selective cats specifically for capturing or converting N2O. No cats = all harmful gases escaping. IMO, capturing or converting some is better than none.
This post was never even intended to ask if i should or how to remove a cat. i wasposting because its not even there to remove anyway and i wasnt, nor anyone i paid, the ones who removed it. i wasnt asking if i should or shouldnt remove the cat i was stating that i dont think i had it in the first place. and was wondering if that was a possibility of a droning issue not how many cows im killing per mile.mrodrig2 wrote:I only posted in the first place because someone said the cats not necessary and basically inferred that OP should remove it. That statement is not true and could cause the OP or others reading this post trouble if they do so without checking their local laws first, so I responded to clear that up.