Pretentious Jerks Rejoice!

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
sbird1
Posts: 6211
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:47 am
Car: 2006 BMW 325i
Location: Savannah, GA

Post

The Viper is back... and it's mid-engine! News and photos of the all new Viper are here, and I have to say... I love it!

Image

Image

Many more pics and specs here:
http://jalopnik.com/5899094/2013-srt-vi ... ke-is-back

All-aluminum, mid-engine 8.4-liter V-10 delivers an estimated 640 horsepower and 600 lb.-ft. of torque – the most torque of any naturally aspirated sports car engine in the world. Thoughts?


User avatar
TTkickedin
Posts: 1658
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:51 am
Car: 1991 Nissan 300zx TT 5 speed, t-tops, < currently in intensive care unit!
2011 MBTA BUS
Location: Braintree, MA
Contact:

Post

That thing looks like it can fit 400 series tires in the back. :eek: It's finally what it should've been back in 89 for sure though.


BTW has anyone ever driven one? I got to move one a few feet, but that's about it.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

TTkickedin wrote:That thing looks like it can fit 400 series tires in the back. :eek: It's finally what it should've been back in 89 for sure though.


BTW has anyone ever driven one? I got to move one a few feet, but that's about it.
I've driven a few 1st generation Vipers at Lime Rock: fast, hot, and primitive.

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post


User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

As much as I despise Chrysler, I'd have to say this is one of the nicest looking "exotics" on the market. Yeah, they had to refine it a little, especially putting in things like traction/stability control, but I think the changes they made were all for the better. It's still a Viper at heart and it looks like a monster.

I can't wait to see it in action. If it's as good as it is on paper, it looks like Dodge hit one out of the park this time.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I've always loved the Viper for its hard-hitting American take on the british roadster. It's one of the purest sports cars one can buy, free of most electronannies (ABS was introduced a few years ago, sadly), and featuring three pedals, a lever for shifting, and clever exhaust routing that defeats the need for a cabin heater.

I'm glad too see Chryiat have stayed true to the formula. The engine has evolved, but isn't over-teched. I was worried it might end up with some Fiat/Ferrari V8 rather than the 8+ liter V10. I absolutely love Ferrari's V8s, but that's not what the Viper is for. I'd buy a Granturismo if I was looking for that kinda thing. The Viper is about pure mechanical engineering doing battle with itself, and the result is galactic-scale awesome.

The only thing I don't like about the new car are the headlights. They're tiny and sorta bland, and don't work with the rest of the car. They look like they fell off a Mazda 6. Then again...at least they're not shaped like f#$king boomerangs.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: The only thing I don't like about the new car are the headlights.
I have to agree 100% here. Thats my only problem with the car. The front end of the second generation was much sexier IMO

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I saw the thread title and thought I was being called out. :biggrin:

The story about how the Viper came to be is quite fascinating. Bob Lutz detailed it in his book "Guts"

From the 92 Viper, Chrysler was able to gain financing, build the Dodge brand, and gain much-needed design and engineering credibility. The cost of development was practically nothing (like 80 million?) compared to what the company got back in public appeal, notoriety, and credibility among enthusiasts. It also taught management how to streamline development, a major factor in Chrysler's profitability through the end of the 90s.

It fully established Dodge, Chrysler, and Jeep as hot brands for the decade.


What Nissan recently did with the Juke-R reminds me of that, except the Viper had the explicit support of certain members of upper management, particularly Lutz, who grabbed a group of engineers and took them to a secret location for a few months to build a prototype.

HEY NISSAN, SUPPORT YOUR ENGINEERS.

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:I've always loved the Viper for its hard-hitting American take on the british roadster. It's one of the purest sports cars one can buy, free of most electronannies (ABS was introduced a few years ago, sadly), and featuring three pedals, a lever for shifting, and clever exhaust routing that defeats the need for a cabin heater.

I'm glad too see Chryiat have stayed true to the formula. The engine has evolved, but isn't over-teched. I was worried it might end up with some Fiat/Ferrari V8 rather than the 8+ liter V10. I absolutely love Ferrari's V8s, but that's not what the Viper is for. I'd buy a Granturismo if I was looking for that kinda thing. The Viper is about pure mechanical engineering doing battle with itself, and the result is galactic-scale awesome.

The only thing I don't like about the new car are the headlights. They're tiny and sorta bland, and don't work with the rest of the car. They look like they fell off a Mazda 6. Then again...at least they're not shaped like f#$king boomerangs.
I will agree with everything you said 100% The thing I like most is that its not all tech'd out and is left simple and old fashioned. Reading the fairly long article about how light, tough, and durable it is, it sounds like it is going to seriously a bad mother on the road. The only thing I dont like as MoD said was the headlights. I feel like it lost the aggressive mean eyed Viper look that it always used to have. Also I can see it easily mistaken for an Aston Martin from the rear. Other than that I really feel impressed. I cant wait to see it on Top Gear.

Did I miss how much it would cost??

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Pricing not yet announced. Likely to be more than I can afford. Way more.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

it's all saying mid-engine. is that a technicality because of the engine's position over the front "axle"?

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

^ Yeah I think so.

The car sounds like a it'll be a monster. I totally agree on the headlights. A Viper's gotta have snake eyes...

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

numbnuts240 wrote:it's all saying mid-engine. is that a technicality because of the engine's position over the front "axle"?
Yep, just like Nissan's FM platform.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Wait a sec. It has a 32 volt stereo. Why? So it can produce more power with lower amounts of current?

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

Without getting all super-technical, basically yeah. Although to get the higher voltage, there has to be a step-up transformer somewhere, which isn't efficient in smaller sizes.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

I get the P=I x E thing. What do you mean by smaller sizes?

User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

Front end reminds me of a Panoz.

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

SO f*** HOT.

Looks quite European.


Return to “General Chat”