I havn't used the new emanage, but the old one was more trouble than it was worth for me... I'm just biased against any type of piggybacks due to my experience with it.WDRacing wrote:The new Emanage doesn't control the MAF output signal. It changes the duty cycle at the injector so no load issues with timing and it's cheaper then the PFC. You can also go without a MAF with the EManage. Does the PFC have a MAP system you can use?
WD
not sure if you're joking or not...InsanityInc wrote:Now here's the real question:
What in the world is "A/COFU"?
The powerfc has a Datalogit in which you can hook up to a PC. It's made by a third-party and costs a few hundred. In fact, that's what we use to toy around with settings as it offers access to engine parameters that the handheld unit leaves out. With the datalogit, complete engine parameter settings can be saved on the PC, modified, and/or uploaded to the unit with a few clicks.deviousKA wrote:So, are you going to tell anyone interested how to interface the unit, schematic? Or are you planning to sell your adapter boards? Personal only?
The powerFC is a mediocre platform imho, and overpriced. But hey if you get one used, more power to ya. It would be much better if the communications protocol was open source and there was some decent pc software instead of that mcu based small screen control unit. I wouldnt be surprised if the protocol has been reversed engineered in japan and there is already tuners doing so, something you might want to look into as it would offer a much better tuning environment.
The s13 sr ecus can be used on an s13 ka with a few board modifications, but there is no advantage over the oem ecu. The b13 and p10 sr ecus are directly compatible with s13 ka24de, same ecu different tune.
The oem ecus have plenty of tuning capability and potential, still seems that everyone is intimidated by them though A little bit of timing map work is all you need for a few hp on a stock engine.
MAF to MAP conversion using a mcu still required a re-tuning of the stock ecu when switching to a "larger MAF", so the only benefit it would offer is just that - conversion from MAF to MAP for the MAF to which the stock ecu is tuned for. I dont see any benefit in running that MAF emulator other than allowing one to run an open atmosphereic BOV, and without having to change MAFs. Ultimately, one still has to modify the eprom to support the larger emulated MAF.deviousKA wrote:Was that the first place you landed on your "jump to conclusions mat"
JP
Actually, map based conversion is in the works. It uses a seperate embedded mcu which calculates a lookup for voltage. This combined with some one-off ecu settings (custom vq, and iat compensation) provides maf "emulation" (more of a pseudo-speed density hybrid actually). The embedded mcu also handles other functions and I am working on implementing a CAN node as well here sometime. I forget the name but there is a unit available in japan that is similar.
And on the real-time tuning aspect of things, we already have the nissan ecus up and running on sram instead of rom. Couple months time should provide full update functions, all self contained. I dont know if you have heard of a tomei reytec but basically identical to those, which are based on nissan ecu. This is all based on the ka24e ecu currently, features full real time monitoring including maptrace and all those goods. I got bored and needed a better ecu for my winter truck, nothing like maptrace and real time update on a bench seat.
I switched to speed-density a while ago (I dont run anything at this low of level in my personal car), that is what it is called here in the usa where it was invented D-jetro is jdm slang for anyone that doesnt know.
So are you going to share the interface schematic for anyone that may be interested? If the plans are that it will be sold, I think that is a bit petty. If that were the case I might just take it upon myself to buy one and design an interface, sell it, and then open source the design (im an *** like that so be aware, lol). This crap is so old already, and most nissan tuners are so far behind the times its sad.
I wasnt aware of that datalogit btw, sounds good.
Anyways, carry on.
Not to imply purchasing anything you have designed and reverse-engineering. That would be completely unnecessary, and frankly, far to easy .deviousKA wrote:So are you going to share the interface schematic for anyone that may be interested? If the plans are that it will be sold, I think that is a bit petty. If that were the case I might just take it upon myself to buy one and design an interface, sell it, and then open source the design (im an *** like that so be aware, lol). This crap is so old already, and most nissan tuners are so far behind the times its sad.
Of course it's easy to copy people's work. Coming up with the design and implementing it is a different story.deviousKA wrote:
Not to imply purchasing anything you have designed and reverse-engineering. That would be completely unnecessary, and frankly, far to easy .
Tell that to JWT.deviousKA wrote:I was just making a point, things like this hold the KA community back. You would be much happier by open sourcing so that someone could actually use it before it becomes obsolete. And even at that, maybe one or two people would actually utilize the information.
Yep, bikirom set the new standard pretty much, if you know how to sauder. Powerfc $1200<Bikirom $300Power FC is outdated and doesn't offer as much functionality, that little green screen gives me a headache, and reading a fat a$$ direction booklet to figure out those functions on the key pad just seems CHEEZY......Power FC ..... Not interesteddeviousKA wrote:The s13 sr ecus can be used on an s13 ka with a few board modifications, but there is no advantage over the oem ecu. The b13 and p10 sr ecus are directly compatible with s13 ka24de, same ecu different tune.
The oem ecus have plenty of tuning capability and potential, still seems that everyone is intimidated by them though A little bit of timing map work is all you need for a few hp on a stock engine.