I know nothing about QR's, but you make it sound good, especially for that CARB crap.2Poor2Buy wrote:I hope posting to this five year old thread 'bumps' it to current. In 2007, the QR25DE was still problematic. In fact, per Wikipedia, the engine had significant revisions starting in 2005, and more in 2007. Removal of the counterbalance system in 2005, variable valve timing? Other electronic improvements?
First, why on earth would I consider installing a QR25DE into a 240SX?
Four main reasons:
1. It is a lightweight, tiny engine, that uses modern technology to give a lot more hp and torque across a wide powerband, and it can sit back far enough to possibly clear the front suspension making it a FMR layout. This could be used to prepare a roughly 25% weight bias to each corner (possibly not even putting the engine all the way back to achieve it), for low speed racing, with an optional 6-speed manual transmission. SCCA autocross might kick it to an excessive class, but just for autocross participation and for street use it would make for a nimble little daily driver with great drivability and power.
2. It exists in at least some Nissan pickups with RWD even to present, apparently with optional 6-speed manual transmissions. This would allow an engine swap to pass the CA SMOG Referee, and mean there would be plenty of donors out there.
3. Perhaps after getting it to pass, possibly use components of some variants of FWD cars that have some decent power-bands, some up to 200hp peak. Internal and electronic changes could move the powerband up, even a head swap if everything fits.
4. The VG/VQ swaps that I have read all seem incredibly expensive, require trimming the oil pan or cross member, and really pack the rear of the engine compartment. It also puts out so much power it is difficult to make use of it all. There's no point in power that you cannot easily transfer to the road. Burnouts are impressive but not practical. If the truck QR25DE installation can be done on the cheap, and the electronics (at least on the first pass) can all come from a newer truck, then the internals (cam timing, valve timing?) adjusted to higher rpm's without spending a fortune, the QR25DE would exceed the power requirements of a 240SX in low-speed autocross and drifting type use, be adequate for freeway power, and get improved gas mileage at the same time.
Granted, the intake and exhaust would be limited to truck stock or aftermarket, but other internal (hidden) modifications would pass the initial inspection or certainly subsequent inspections. Stock engines could be hammered and thrown away as needed, as the QR is now (and becoming more-so) the cheap used engine to get. The KA24DE is (or will be) less available as time since their production increases. This holds even more true for the KA24E. Likewise their transmissions.
To answer the most obvious question I'll be asked, I don't need the total power of a VG or VQ. I want instantly available acceleration at all rpm's but not total power. Turbo models? JDM models? Not in California.
As of this writing (January, 2013) there are many available dying S13 (mostly 89) 240SX cars available in California. Changing one from a KA24E to a KA24DE through CA smog would be as difficult as changing to another engine. Using an RB or SR based engine is absolutely not a legal option. So a cheap QR25DE swap might be able to extend the lives of old 240SX cars.
Fabricated (or modified truck) mounts would hold a longitudinal QR block to the frame rails, making front cross member clearance a non-issue.
I hope this opens an interesting conversation. Please don't bash my head in if this is a bad idea. Rather, explain why it is a bad idea. QR's break? No problem, consider the long blocks consumable commodities that cost less than a conversion kit for a QR engine. As for a wiring conversion, It seems best to use the entire harness out of the donor, even swap every possible gauge to the new ones as OBDII would be a pain to get around.