Ace2cool wrote:Why downgrade? The Z was always a better car than the S chassis.
I knew someone would bring up that argument haha I don't know I feel like if I sell the Z now I'll actually make a profit on itDude, in less than a month you'll have a big boy job. Do you really think you'll still be worrying about 17 mpg then?
That's how it is here as well, pretty ridiculous when you see how much some of the pos 240sx's go for thanks to the fan boys. what kind of mpg does a s14 get? I can't imagine it being more than mid 20's which I can get close to in the Z.Fearspect wrote:Don't 240sx's tend to go for more than z32s? They certainly do up here in Canada because a lot of people are looking for drift ready cars and aren't so interested in just buying a new Scion FR-S just to beat on it.
Because of this ^ and if your only concern is economy, then I am not following your logic much here either. A Miata/240/"sports car" really doesn't give a huge mpg change, and if your only getting 17 mpg with your Z then you may have other issues to deal with as I get 20 mpg consistently with my TT, and my NA would cough up a 21 or 22 mpg occasionally if I ran mostly freeway miles that tank. Any less and I am under the hood and checking things instantly.fluffybunny wrote:Dude, in less than a month you'll have a big boy job. Do you really think you'll still be worrying about 17 mpg then?
I thought it was bad for Zs to use 91....Road Warrior Z32 wrote:I don't think that's the reason why you want to trade or get a s14 ... I'm 18 and I've had my Z for 2 years now it's running great thanks to me .... I pump 91 octane from chevron and every 2 weeks i use chevrons octane booster, that helps clean as well and i get good miles per gallon .... my tank is always full, i don't like the needle dropping . After all the horror stories I heard about the VG30 its not that bad ... I changed the water pump my self .... I give props to all the Z owners that have done this lol.... think about it man!
Alot of state's like California only have 91 for premium, here in WA.they are kind of dumb in that we have 92 which is rare and annoying for tuning as it usually means we get set up with a 91 octane tune unless it's done on a dyno here.JsickZ32 wrote: I thought it was bad for Zs to use 91....
So it doesnt matter as long as you add octane booster? Because around here the diff in price between 91 and 93 is 40 cents....Z-owned wrote:Alot of state's like California only have 91 for premium, here in WA.they are kind of dumb in that we have 92 which is rare and annoying for tuning as it usually means we get set up with a 91 octane tune unless it's done on a dyno here.JsickZ32 wrote: I thought it was bad for Zs to use 91....
^^^^^This^^^^^Ace2cool wrote:Oh, and BTW, 240's aren't THAT much better on gas. And they still run premium. Just food for thought.
Fearspect wrote:Nope, trade the z. You want a 240, and they are worth more.

Looks like I'm keeping the Z haha if it got 20 mpg I would be happy but 17 is just annoying. I know its only a difference of 3 buts its like come on a crappy 90's ford explorer gets like 16-17 too and I'm not even pushing a v8.Ace2cool wrote:It's true that they're worth more, but 9 times out of 10 they've been modded and bastardized to the point that they'll be a headache.
I'd say if you really want a different car, go for it, but make it worthwhile. Trust me, I drove my friend's modded 240, and was very disappointed in the performance vs my N/A. It did handle a bit better, but that was coilovers/adjustable links/ roll cage vs bone stock N/A 2+2.
If the whole reason for citing trading is better fuel economy, you're looking in the wrong places. That's Honda territory. Toyota territory. Scion territory. Nissan didn't make good fuel economy vehicles that are fun. I feel like you would regret the trade in some form.
Unless you absolutely have your heart set on a 240, in which case, we're not gonna stop you. Do what you do brother. I'll be sad to see such a knowledgeable guy leave the tech area though.