Possible trade?

The Nissan 300ZX (Z32) general community discussion forum
User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

Hi guys,

I asked this question in the 240sx forum so I wanted to get the other side of the spectrum's opinion.

Would my 90 300zx NA be a good trade for a decent s14?

I love my Z but I'm gonna need something more economical as my daily.


User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

What lets see some pics of the S14? Kouki or Zenki?

Mod list? Need more details.

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

My bad I should have specified that I don't actually have a trade set up yet. I just wanted to know in general if I found a clean S14 would it be a reasonable trade?

I wouldn't take anything that's all messed up, nor anything that's super modified because I don't trust most people who try to mod their cars. My Z is in pretty good shape, only has 99k original miles and I rebuilt the whole top end at 98k (all new gaskets including headgaskets, valve stem seals, new new-style injectors with the adapter kit, pcv valves and silicone hoses, brand new timing belt/water pump/idlers/tensioner, etc.) and the body/paint are good.

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

Ahh I see what you saying now.

Yes I think you could possibly find a trade. It just all depends on the other party and the condition of each vehicle.

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

Why downgrade? The Z was always a better car than the S chassis.

Rager
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 12:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan 300ZX 2+2
1999 Nissan Sentra
2004 Chevy Silverado
Location: 860, the Z, 802, oh ive got area codes

Post

Ace2cool wrote:Why downgrade? The Z was always a better car than the S chassis.

oooobviously :rolleyes:

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

I knew I was gonna get flamed for asking this on the Z forum haha

I know the Z is better than the 240 in every way, but right now in my life it's not just about go-fast or big power. I still want something sporty (I'm only 22 after all) but I need something that gets more than 17 mpg. I'm not so concerned about mpg as to buy a Camry because I drove one of those for 3 years and couldn't stand the lack of acceleration. Anyway, I can't really afford to just keep the Z and get another car so I figured I can either:

1. Sell the Z outright and use the cash to buy an S14 and then have some money left over.

2. Trade my Z for an S14 with some cash on their end.

I know it sounds like a stupid trade, but 17-17.5 mpg is killing me lol. I still have most of the stuff to do a TT swap so I figured I'll keep it until I find a clean shell and I have more money. I start my first real out-of-college job in June so I wanted to get this done before then.

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

Oh and someone on the 240 forum already told me to go buy a Miata :facepalm:

User avatar
H1tman
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:38 pm
Car: '90 300zx 2+2 Azure Blue
Location: Temecula, CA

Post

I would trade a z32 for an s14. NO WAY I would trade ChelZ but if i had some other color i would for sure. Its very understandable to want to get rid of a z32 because they can be a handful. An s14 is a downgrade but the low cost of maintenance, practicality and ease to work on is an advantage over a z32.

Key here is to get an s14 "equal" to your z32.

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

I'd honestly go buy a Miata outright. I was seriously considering one before I found my TT. I probably still will get one at some point, but not right now.

User avatar
fluffybunny
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:33 pm
Car: '90 300ZX
'90 300ZXTT
'90 VW Fox
'97 Legacy GT
'05 Audi S4
'10 370Z 40th Anniversary Edition

Post

Dude, in less than a month you'll have a big boy job. Do you really think you'll still be worrying about 17 mpg then?

User avatar
JsickZ32
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:17 am
Car: 1990 300zx 2+2
Location: Boston, MA

Post

My Z actually has better MPG than my truck. Try 9 miles per gallon. I want an S14 tho. If i had space on my garage id get one.

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

I can't justify a Miata when I'm 6' 3" lol that's the main reason
Dude, in less than a month you'll have a big boy job. Do you really think you'll still be worrying about 17 mpg then?
I knew someone would bring up that argument haha I don't know I feel like if I sell the Z now I'll actually make a profit on it

Fearspect
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:08 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300zx TT 2+2
Location: Edmonton, AB

Post

Don't 240sx's tend to go for more than z32s? They certainly do up here in Canada because a lot of people are looking for drift ready cars and aren't so interested in just buying a new Scion FR-S just to beat on it.

User avatar
Z-owned
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Car: 93 N/A Z32
90 VW Corrado
01 mr2 spyder
Location: Auburn, WA.

Post

Fearspect wrote:Don't 240sx's tend to go for more than z32s? They certainly do up here in Canada because a lot of people are looking for drift ready cars and aren't so interested in just buying a new Scion FR-S just to beat on it.
That's how it is here as well, pretty ridiculous when you see how much some of the pos 240sx's go for thanks to the fan boys. what kind of mpg does a s14 get? I can't imagine it being more than mid 20's which I can get close to in the Z.

User avatar
DCaff300ZX
Posts: 4202
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:18 am
Car: .
1993 CRP TT- Modified
Location: Tacoma, Washington

Post

fluffybunny wrote:Dude, in less than a month you'll have a big boy job. Do you really think you'll still be worrying about 17 mpg then?
Because of this ^ and if your only concern is economy, then I am not following your logic much here either. A Miata/240/"sports car" really doesn't give a huge mpg change, and if your only getting 17 mpg with your Z then you may have other issues to deal with as I get 20 mpg consistently with my TT, and my NA would cough up a 21 or 22 mpg occasionally if I ran mostly freeway miles that tank. Any less and I am under the hood and checking things instantly.
I'd wait and see what kind of income change your "Big Boy" job nets you, I'm betting that getting a economy car for daily action if you so choose will be doable, and leave you your Z as a "Big Boy" project back at the house waiting for your attention... :gotme

Road Warrior Z32
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:54 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300zx
Location: California

Post

I don't think that's the reason why you want to trade or get a s14 ... I'm 18 and I've had my Z for 2 years now it's running great thanks to me .... I pump 91 octane from chevron and every 2 weeks i use chevrons octane booster, that helps clean as well and i get good miles per gallon .... my tank is always full, i don't like the needle dropping . After all the horror stories I heard about the VG30 its not that bad ... I changed the water pump my self .... I give props to all the Z owners that have done this lol :yesnod .... think about it man!

User avatar
JsickZ32
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:17 am
Car: 1990 300zx 2+2
Location: Boston, MA

Post

Road Warrior Z32 wrote:I don't think that's the reason why you want to trade or get a s14 ... I'm 18 and I've had my Z for 2 years now it's running great thanks to me .... I pump 91 octane from chevron and every 2 weeks i use chevrons octane booster, that helps clean as well and i get good miles per gallon .... my tank is always full, i don't like the needle dropping . After all the horror stories I heard about the VG30 its not that bad ... I changed the water pump my self .... I give props to all the Z owners that have done this lol :yesnod .... think about it man!
I thought it was bad for Zs to use 91....

User avatar
Z-owned
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Car: 93 N/A Z32
90 VW Corrado
01 mr2 spyder
Location: Auburn, WA.

Post

JsickZ32 wrote: I thought it was bad for Zs to use 91....
Alot of state's like California only have 91 for premium, here in WA.they are kind of dumb in that we have 92 which is rare and annoying for tuning as it usually means we get set up with a 91 octane tune unless it's done on a dyno here.

User avatar
JsickZ32
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 5:17 am
Car: 1990 300zx 2+2
Location: Boston, MA

Post

Z-owned wrote:
JsickZ32 wrote: I thought it was bad for Zs to use 91....
Alot of state's like California only have 91 for premium, here in WA.they are kind of dumb in that we have 92 which is rare and annoying for tuning as it usually means we get set up with a 91 octane tune unless it's done on a dyno here.
So it doesnt matter as long as you add octane booster? Because around here the diff in price between 91 and 93 is 40 cents....

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

No, octane booster is a waste of money, as it won't disperse completely evenly and isn't an exact science. And that's the price you pay for owning a Z. You CAN run it off of 91, but the ECU will retard the timing to compensate. And 19 is usually a lower grade fuel than 93.

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

Oh, and BTW, 240's aren't THAT much better on gas. And they still run premium. Just food for thought.

User avatar
DCaff300ZX
Posts: 4202
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:18 am
Car: .
1993 CRP TT- Modified
Location: Tacoma, Washington

Post

Difficult to find any sports car that doesn't run premium, it's really the only higher octane fuel left available other than the oddball farm suppliers and such like Cenex. We used to have a Cenex about 3 blocks away when I was a kid that sold 100 octane from the pump, BB Ford's LOVE 100 octane... :dblthumb:

nissanfreak12
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:07 pm
Car: 92 300zx 2+2 TT
Location: Denver, CO

Post

Ace2cool wrote:Oh, and BTW, 240's aren't THAT much better on gas. And they still run premium. Just food for thought.
^^^^^This^^^^^

I get average with my TT 22mpg, that up from my old NA which was at 18. I owned a S13 shassis, they run the same engine which is KA24DE, same engine they use in the hardbody truck and the altima's in that time frame. Avg was 21-24 dependent on mood and highway was 23-27(if I remember right). So Ace is spot on, like always, isn't that much better.

Besides, we would just call you a fanboy, and who wants that......keep the Z and try and deal with it until you get settled. YOU WILL KICK YOURSELF FOR TRADING/SELLING IT IN THE LONG RUN!!!


Sounds to me you need to TT it to get the better mileage.

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

OK OK so basically my options are:

1. Keep the Z

2. 240's are nice to look at, but keep the Z

OR

3. Keep the Z?

Did I pretty much sum up what everyone said??

Fearspect
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:08 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300zx TT 2+2
Location: Edmonton, AB

Post

Nope, trade the z. You want a 240, and they are worth more.

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

Fearspect wrote:Nope, trade the z. You want a 240, and they are worth more.
Image

Fearspect
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:08 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300zx TT 2+2
Location: Edmonton, AB

Post

It's not even a TT and 240s are worth significantly more. And you want a 240. If you can swindle a guy to trade your z for it, go for it. Hopefully its not friend/family.

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

It's true that they're worth more, but 9 times out of 10 they've been modded and bastardized to the point that they'll be a headache.

I'd say if you really want a different car, go for it, but make it worthwhile. Trust me, I drove my friend's modded 240, and was very disappointed in the performance vs my N/A. It did handle a bit better, but that was coilovers/adjustable links/ roll cage vs bone stock N/A 2+2.

If the whole reason for citing trading is better fuel economy, you're looking in the wrong places. That's Honda territory. Toyota territory. Scion territory. Nissan didn't make good fuel economy vehicles that are fun. I feel like you would regret the trade in some form.

Unless you absolutely have your heart set on a 240, in which case, we're not gonna stop you. Do what you do brother. I'll be sad to see such a knowledgeable guy leave the tech area though.

User avatar
t.mcginley.jr
Posts: 1547
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am
Car: 2002 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
1990 Nissan 300ZX NA 2+0
1966 Ford Mustang
Location: New Jersey, USA

Post

Ace2cool wrote:It's true that they're worth more, but 9 times out of 10 they've been modded and bastardized to the point that they'll be a headache.

I'd say if you really want a different car, go for it, but make it worthwhile. Trust me, I drove my friend's modded 240, and was very disappointed in the performance vs my N/A. It did handle a bit better, but that was coilovers/adjustable links/ roll cage vs bone stock N/A 2+2.

If the whole reason for citing trading is better fuel economy, you're looking in the wrong places. That's Honda territory. Toyota territory. Scion territory. Nissan didn't make good fuel economy vehicles that are fun. I feel like you would regret the trade in some form.

Unless you absolutely have your heart set on a 240, in which case, we're not gonna stop you. Do what you do brother. I'll be sad to see such a knowledgeable guy leave the tech area though.
Looks like I'm keeping the Z haha if it got 20 mpg I would be happy but 17 is just annoying. I know its only a difference of 3 buts its like come on a crappy 90's ford explorer gets like 16-17 too and I'm not even pushing a v8.

I think the biggest drains on my fuel economy are:

1. No TT

2. No manual

And big boy job + students loans = no money still :mad:


Return to “300ZX (Z32) General”