rabsusa wrote:i compare the Q to my 95 accord, on 211 k miles
the honda gets cheap gas, no maintenence, used oil from Q, run all the way to empty tank until i m ready to fill up again,
never had to touch fuel pump or injectors, and has NEVER let me down, never an engine light on, recently abs light has come on
only light to come on in years. Why is the honda so much more reliable when i could have bought 3 of them for the price of the Q new??
I guess Q components are not 3 times as well made???? Should be, I d be dissappointed with car had i shelled out 60 K for it. Before you guys beat me, my first 94 Q in 1999 cost me 20 grand, thankfully this one alot less, however, no end of trouble came with it.
i shudder to think what wud happen to Q if i treated it the same way! infact without the honda i d be totally lost if i were soley dependent on the Q, shes just a drive way queen, and a pretty one at that,
hopefully FP shud be last issue for this year, till i need tires etc etc, hehehehe
R
Do you know what a Nissan President is?
The Infiniti Q45 was based off of it, A Nissan President is the most prestigious car Nissan makes. The Nissan president and the Infiniti Q45 was made for rich people that brought the car to the dealer EVERY 90 days for service. We only drive it because the value has gone so far down. But no matter the value I still look at it as a $50 car and try to treat it as such. Clearly others should be shot in the head for doing otherwise but that just means more parts for us.
I was kidding about the shot in the head part. But seriously these cars were meant to be driven by upper class people who could afford to deal with each and every problem that could possibly go wrong with them.