ScorchedNX2K wrote:The perfect locomotive system for a car would be all four wheels powered individually by electric motors of sufficient power. Supplying those motors with juice could either be full electric via a fuel cell or a small diesel hybrid system. Even steam power would work in this case. Combine this with a suite of sensors, super-fast computing, a good chassis, and light weight and you WILL have the fastest car on the road.
That is the system Chevy's Volt, Cadillac's Converj, and Fisker's Karma use. Unfortunately, GM's system is still "wrong." Rather than running at a specifically tuned RPM at all times, offering a good blend of power and efficiency, the gas engine actually generates electrical power on-demand. Which means even though each wheel has its own electric motor, when you nail the throttle, the gas engine revs up just like it would in a normal car. So where the hell is the benefit? At that point, you might as well just get rid of the electric motors altogether.The right way to do it, like you said, is to use a turbodiesel powerplant. Design it to run at <1000rpm constantly. You use the batteries as a power buffer. The engine is always recharging the battery, except under heavy acceleration, during which time the battery capacity takes up duties of delivering "extra" power. You never increase engine RPM because then efficiency starts to drop. You simply take advantage of mixed driving and battery as a combined effort. Battery gets drained (beyond engine charge capacity) during acceleration but gets recharged (beyond power drain from motors) during steady cruise.This design doesn't look good on EPA papers, though, because they will never operate as a ZEV. And everyone knows the EPA is more important than real science. So maybe that's why no one is doing a correct electric-drive hybrid-electric car. No PZEV cert means less tax breaks. I love it when politics get in the way of science.