Post by
shimman »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/shimman-u56211.html
Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:31 pm
both will not improve much at all unless you need to squeeze last drop of power from the motor.
pop charger (if you are referring to the washable air filter sits right before the throttle) works better at the higher rpm because it will reduce the length of the intake air pathway; meaning low friction; however, becasue it is sucking air from the side of the car, air temp or density will be affected reduced the power gains.
i think pop charger can reduce the torque at the lower band because the resonance that needs to make push the air to the engine might not work well with the shorter pathway; thus, it might give you more power at the high band, but it could also hurt at the lower bank although this is just my thought. the engine sounds is alreay great & loud enough for me, so personally i would go for the cold air
btw, my buddy's hyundai sonata has a cold air intake which is taking air from the grill, and i think it might provide a ram air effect at higher speed.
both system won't provide you noticable difference other than higher intake air noise if you choose pop charger
if you are looking for better acceleration, reduce the weight by removing unnecessary stuffs & perhaps you can loose weight (just kidding )