Sircnay wrote:Tiger only because they hunt down larger prey too and they're faster. On land speed gives you an advantage.
My wife's a biologist and for some time she specialized in large carnivores.
The bear vs. tiger debate is brought up alot but these fights have been documented. The Siberian tigers territory overlaps with two species of bear = the asiatic black bear and the gigantic siberian brown bears. Both the tiger and siberian black bear have been recorded preying on the smaller black bear. Most black bears in this region dont get bigger than 600 lbs. The largest tiger weighed in at nearly 900 lbs.
The brown bears that patrol these regions are altogether different. They are big mofo's usually weighing as much as american kodiak's. These ones are usually 8 ft. tall and weigh in the neighborhood of 1000-1300 lbs. There's an even larger subspecies called the Siberian Kamkatcha which is purpotedly the largest species of bear in existence with researches reportedly sighting ones standing 14 ft. tall and weighing over 2,000 lbs. None of these species have been shot and weighed so there is no real proof just many eyewitness accounts. The biggest bear ever recorded was a male polar weighing 2,300 lbs. and measuring 11.9 ft. tall.
The outcome of the fight depends and here's why:
1) A fight between a siberian tiger and a black bear - tiger will own. black bears are usually more docile than browns and give up alot of size to the big cat. BUT there was a segment in a National Geographic video that showed a small himalayan black bear (260 lbs.) fighting off a pair of bengal tigers (400 lbs. a piece)
2) A fight between a siberian tiger and a brown bear - this could go either way. A bear of equal size to the tiger or smaller is probably not a match because bears have more fat mass and less muscle. But brown bears are the most vicious fighter of the bear family. Viciousness goes a long way. I've seen wolverines fight off larger animals like wolves, mountain lions and even bears. The same can be said of pitbulls fighting off doberman's, saint bernard's or even great danes. That said, asiatic lions and even baboons have been known to fend off the small bengal tigers.
3) A fight between a siberian tiger and a seriously large bear is a wash. Brown bears have been known to trail siberian tigers and take their kill. A large Kamkatcha standing 6 ft. heigh at the shoulders and weighing moe than a ton can stop any land mammal except maybe elephants and rhino's with one back-breaking blow. Three male siberians were killed in 2000 by brown bears. Each tiger had large gaping wounds caused by a bear's claws. a- Size difference. A bear weighing 1,200lbs. + is larger than even the biggest Siberian. Fat mass weighs a lot less than muscle so imagine how much visual size a tiger would be giving up. b- With the huge size, a bear in winter grows extra layers of fat and more fur to gear up for hibernation. Doing more damage to the bear would be even tougher. c- Bears have a higher ferociousness factor. Because they scavenge often and come into contact with other bears, bears are the more aggressive of the two. A tiger's method of attack on larger prey is by going for the throat. Bears are virtually impenetrable to this attack because of humongous neck girth, fat and fir armouring and because they're fast. Unlike an elk or deer, a bear would be buckling like a bull wailing its 6inch's claws like mike tyson. d- The knockout blow. Every strike from a bear is a knockout blow. Because they scavenge for berries and ground-dwelling prey, they're claws have evolved to extraordinary growth. Some have measure up to 7inch's long. Imagine the damage that would do with a 900 lb. swing. e- Bears are well-known pit fighters that's why they're on the california flag. In the 1800's and 1900's, bears were pitted against wolf packs, bulldogs, bulls and other large animals. Most of the time the bear was the victor. From a first-hand witness a bear cracked an angus bull's skull with one swing. Another made quick work of a full-grown male lion.
And those are the facts!