MAXIMUS Nismo wrote:is this ever going to end? IF not, LOCK THE DAMN THREAD!
I know, wheres the mods? Insanity got his proof, and still isn't happyMAXIMUS Nismo wrote:is this ever going to end? IF not, LOCK THE DAMN THREAD!
Thanks, I like it too! Just wait till its not an offroad vehicleyessir240 wrote:i Quadruple what he said this thread has gone from 2 nice cars, to a rice argue thread...btw nice s14 haha
Mee too, i have no idea what the deal is about the rice?BomexS13 wrote:I like the supra......
Thanks!574-240sx wrote:Very nice.
Heard what from the owner? His blatantly false speculation about what his body kit is doing for him?GrilledCheese33 wrote: welcome to nico MKIV Surfer
Now there should be nothing to argue about since you heard it from the owner, right, insanity inc?
I'm talking noticable difference though, and yeah, 160 is high, it'll probably happen around 100/120 depending on how the wing is designed, but you'd need a ridiculously massive wing to have a really noticable difference at 60.PantherRacer wrote:Wings come into play @ around 60mph. It's a fact. It's because at speeds above 60mph, the car will increasingly become unstable. so the 160mph theory is jack**** the wing is needed before that speed.
Speaking from experience, I can say that the wings on Imprezas come into their range of functionality at around 80mph. I had a wingless WRX sedan, and at over 80mph, it was wandering all over the place, felt really unstable. I since have driven an '02 WRX with an '04 STI wing (and front lip) on it and it felt PLANTED at 120mph and above.InsanityInc wrote:I'm talking noticable difference though, and yeah, 160 is high, it'll probably happen around 100/120 depending on how the wing is designed, but you'd need a ridiculously massive wing to have a really noticable difference at 60.
Yeah, and that's a pretty big wing. And the difference between 60mph and 80mph is really very massive aerodynamically speaking, as all aerodyanmic properties scale exponentially with speed. Plus, you've got to figure that the WRX is based off of a platform that probably wasn't designed with the utmost of aerodynamics in mind, and probably has some lift on the rear end which can be countered by some minor downforce. I'd imagine the actual downforce coming into play isn't that much, but it's a big difference because it's countering lift.HashiriyaS14 wrote:Speaking from experience, I can say that the wings on Imprezas come into their range of functionality at around 80mph. I had a wingless WRX sedan, and at over 80mph, it was wandering all over the place, felt really unstable. I since have driven an '02 WRX with an '04 STI wing (and front lip) on it and it felt PLANTED at 120mph and above.
*sigh*InsanityInc wrote:Hey look, another person who has no ****ing clue what he's talking about, how fun. Do you for some reason think that air is flowing at an upwards angle through your engine bay? Until it gets to the back, it's pretty much going straight, and since your radiator is directly below that vent it isn't doing ****. The VIS invader hood for 240s has the same problem, the vent doesn't do diddly. Also, a random hole in your hood isn't going to do ambient cooling when you're in motion, because air is flowing through your engine bay, not just sitting there and dissipating.
Where in my post did I tell people to go 160mph on the highway, or mention that I, myself, go 160mph on the highway? I never even mentioned a specific speed. I said that a Supra is in it's element while racing on the highway, where the spoiler will function properly.InsanityInc wrote:High speed highway runs? Are you ****ting me. You're the biggest dumbass on the face of the earth if you're going 160mph on a public highway.
The VIS hood vent is positioned behind the radiator as well, but just like this particular hood, it's positioned about 4-5 inches behind it, which is useless because no air is going to get out of the hood that way. The air will not just suddenly turn up and shoot out the top of your hood because you put a hole there. There's a bit more to venting than that.spanishricer wrote:*sigh*
Maybe you didn't see where I said the vent is positioned BEHIND the radiator, not on top of it. That is why the VIS invader hood doesn't function properly and why the VIS Jun-Style hood does. So I've narrowed it down to either one of three things...
1) You can't read.2) You don't know what you're talking about.3) JUN, Msport, Chargespeed, Yashio Factory, etc...all don't know how to design functional vented hoods.
Ask someone who actually owns a VIS invader hood where the vent sits, and don't go by the pictures you see online.InsanityInc wrote:
The VIS hood vent is positioned behind the radiator as well, but just like this particular hood, it's positioned about 4-5 inches behind it, which is useless because no air is going to get out of the hood that way. The air will not just suddenly turn up and shoot out the top of your hood because you put a hole there. There's a bit more to venting than that.
Don't pull that "holier than thou" crap, it's old and tired. Street racing has been around longer than most of us have been alive and it's not going to disappear anytime soon. Nothing wrong with getting on it when you've got an open stretch of highway.InsanityInc wrote:OK. Then let me rephrase. If you're racing on a public highway, you're a ****ing moron.
I've seen pictures specifically showing the positioning of the vent in relation to the radiator. I'd say that's just as good as seeing one in person.spanishricer wrote:Ask someone who actually owns a VIS invader hood where the vent sits, and don't go by the pictures you see online.
Personally I don't like the disgn of sideskirts but they *could* actually work and I realize I'm stepping out on a bit of a limb when I say that.InsanityInc wrote:Hah hah. Sorry, just because you think your "aero kit" looks nifty doesn't mean it does a damned thing for aerodynamics. First of all, the front lip is fairly soft urethane attached by a few screws. It's not going to be able to hold any kind of downforce or transmit it to your car. Second, considering the massive gap between the FMIC and the end of the space for the FMIC, you're not going to keep any air out from under the car. And notice that little backwards swoop on the sideskirts? Yeah, that's doing nothing but creating drag. If anything, I'd guess his car is actually LESS aerodynamic with those modifications. Anything that has actual aerodynamic properties would cost a fortune aftermarket. There's a reason why you don't see race cars with common body kits, they don't do ****.
Just as I thought...InsanityInc wrote:
I've seen pictures specifically showing the positioning of the vent in relation to the radiator. I'd say that's just as good as seeing one in person.
Oh, so you're still retarded? Seeing pictures of the vent specifically viewing how the vent is oriented in relation to the radiator gives you the exact same perspective as seeing it in real life. If you're going to try and dispute that, you may want to get your head examined.spanishricer wrote:Just as I thought...
Whether a car is pretty or not is not my first priority. Please stop implying that it is.InsanityInc wrote:See, that's where you're wrong. Racing is ALWAYS scientific, just not always pretty. I don't have a problem with blatantly ugly things that have a practical purpose. And I can guarantee that they didn't just throw on some plastic pieces and call it good. Those little ugly white things were designed by an engineer to serve a specific aerodynamic purpose.
Looks can be deceiving. I guarantee those are something stronger than the common urethane bodykits are made of.Veriest1 wrote:Whether a car is pretty or not is not my first priority. Please stop implying that it is.
Anyway, on topic, the little white things look to be more flimsy than the supras splitters. That's the point I was making.
Oh, using pretty lil' pictures as hard evidence again are we? It could be made out of leftover condoms for all you know...InsanityInc wrote:Looks can be deceiving. I guarantee those are something stronger than the common urethane bodykits are made of.
You should take your own advice and not base your responses on images you find on the internet...InsanityInc wrote:Looks can be deceiving.
Jesus ****ing christ you little retard, the pictures were in a thread whose purpose was to examine the poorness of the vent placement. Also, looks can't be decieving when they line a ****ing camera up and take a picture of the hood in parallel relation to the radiator. You can judge distance and dimensions by sight, but you can't judge the hardiness of a material by sight.spanishricer wrote:Oh, using pretty lil' pictures as hard evidence again are we? It could be made out of leftover condoms for all you know...
You should take your own advice and not base your responses on images you find on the internet...