as for the supras wing, its different and thats good. especially when you see almost every supra with that wing, not mention just about nehting else you can imagine *(berettas/camry/accord)* *which i would definately consider rice* not a 630 hp supraJuujai wrote:theres lots of nonperforming stuff we put in our car. that kit might look flashy and have lots of weird lines but the only thing i really see that makes it look ricey is the corner lights, the celica looking scoop, the nonstock headlights and the hood. the kititself is okay. if you want to see weird and wild stuff look at top secret, ab flug etc and you'll see stuff with crazier lines. atleast its dropped and has "decent" fitting wheels. unlike most of the 4x4 mom looking 240s i see... with +40offset
I win.Veriest1 wrote:From http://www.slangsite.com/slang/R.html
Ricer: A guy/girl that makes their car look like it has engine power, put it doesn't.Example: (ex. Dodge Neon 106hp engine with yellow sitckers and fake chrome hub caps supposedly = +60hp)
The only parts I see on that Supra that don't serve a somewhat worthwhile performance function is the sideskirts and rear aprons. And they are neccesary to keep the car from looking off-balance with the front bumper.InsanityInc wrote:
He contradicted himself because he was wrong again and said he's never wrong. Simply because your car has actual performance parts doesn't change the fact that you have parts on it that are gaudy and non-performing.
Some were taken with my fujifilm 3.2 megapixel and others were taken with a 5 megapixel canon powershot.TachyonS14 wrote:I agree, supra = rice. I'd respect it a whole lot more if the outside was stock. I think it looks horrible. But hey, your photos came out really good. What kind of camera did you use?
Definately agreed!whiterps13 wrote:wouldnt it be nice if the word rice was never seen on these forums again? mods, make it a swear word. all i ever want to see is "youre car is ****d out"
Yup, thats very trueGEO wrote:Seriously, anyone who calls that supra rice is naive.
Bzzt, wrong. Look at the front shot. The FMIC opening hangs a good 2-3 inches lower than the FMIC, which is totally unnecessary and was obviously done to make the car look lower. Also, that little intake vent is completely useless, look at the underhood shot and you can see it doesn't go anywhere. Not to mention the "look I'm an F1 car" front "downforce" wing things on the front lip are retarded. Yeah, really, your bumper made of fairly soft urethane attached by a few screws is really going to be designed to create lots of downforce, I swear.spanishricer wrote:
1) The front bumper provides a bigger opening for the FMIC and an duct for cool incoming air.
Hah hah. Sorry, just because you think your "aero kit" looks nifty doesn't mean it does a damned thing for aerodynamics. First of all, the front lip is fairly soft urethane attached by a few screws. It's not going to be able to hold any kind of downforce or transmit it to your car. Second, considering the massive gap between the FMIC and the end of the space for the FMIC, you're not going to keep any air out from under the car. And notice that little backwards swoop on the sideskirts? Yeah, that's doing nothing but creating drag. If anything, I'd guess his car is actually LESS aerodynamic with those modifications. Anything that has actual aerodynamic properties would cost a fortune aftermarket. There's a reason why you don't see race cars with common body kits, they don't do ****.Veriest1 wrote:
1) The front bumper also has those nice big splitters. They're probably quite functional. Brake ducts could easily be worked in there as well.
What? How is a non-aerodynamic body kit going to make you handle better? Are you completely off your rocker?PantherRacer wrote:I think the supra looks good.
InsanityInc is a prime example of how some NiCO members are adopting a close-minded, head up *** view on cars. Just because they have a bodykit, it's bad. not everyone is performance oriented and think about it, that bodykit with those mods, most likely helps the car to handle better than if it still had on it's stock bodykit.
Ok, if you owned a full blown rare 1994 hard top supra show car(there was only 75 1994 hard tops sold in the US, the rest were targas: check it out athttp://www.suprahardtopregistry.com/ ), Why in the h*** would you even think about taking it to the track??????????????????????????????????????????? The car is meant for street and show. Not to be taken out and screwed over.InsanityInc wrote:I can't tell if the wing is functional or not as there aren't any particularly good shots of it. However, I'm betting it's non-functional considering the rest of the car. Also, has he ever been at speeds in excess of 160mph? I'm guessing not. If he showed up to a road course with that car he'd get laughed off the track. Not to mention considering that powerband it would be just about undrivable on a road course.
Note: I wasn't agreeing with your opinion of what to do with the car.GrilledCheese33 wrote:good, i'm glad. 1 of 75:The car is rare, i don't mind you posting at all, just please don't give your opinion of rice again.
-Darren
you weren't clear. O well, i'm got going to say anymoreInsanityInc wrote:
Note: I wasn't agreeing with your opinion of what to do with the car.
If you race those exoctics, i would have to call you stupidInsanityInc wrote:
Wow. By your logic, nobody should race ferrari enzos or shelby cobras. I rest my case.
Modified by InsanityInc at 10:05 PM 7/20/2005
Then you obviously don't understand that those cars were designed for racing. If you never took an enzo to the track it would be a travesty.GrilledCheese33 wrote:If you race those exoctics, i would have to call you stupid
Bzzt, wrong. Did you ever think that having the FMIC opening a good 2-3 inches lower than the FMIC is for cooling. Supra's have great cooling issues on the auto course. This was not done to make the car look lower........it was done to get more air to the radiator to keep the temps down. So it is not totally unnecessary..........if your auto coursing, it is actually pretty NECESSARY. And the "little intake vent" is just above the FMIC to give air flow to the radiator.InsanityInc wrote:Bzzt, wrong. Look at the front shot. The FMIC opening hangs a good 2-3 inches lower than the FMIC, which is totally unnecessary and was obviously done to make the car look lower. Also, that little intake vent is completely useless, look at the underhood shot and you can see it doesn't go anywhere. Not to mention the "look I'm an F1 car" front "downforce" wing things on the front lip are retarded. Yeah, really, your bumper made of fairly soft urethane attached by a few screws is really going to be designed to create lots of downforce, I swear.
Actually, the wing provides more or less downforce as the stock wing (wing is adjustable). So YES, it does have a purpose. Did you know that a wing helps you stay stable under braking also?? Not just at high speeds. And with the powerband....the stock rev limiter can be bumped up to 7500 very easily. Believe it or not......people use bigger turbos on the road course. So having 300rwhp at only 4200 is a pretty good power band (maybe its not for you guys, but it is for supra guys).InsanityInc wrote:I can't tell if the wing is functional or not as there aren't any particularly good shots of it. However, I'm betting it's non-functional considering the rest of the car. Also, has he ever been at speeds in excess of 160mph? I'm guessing not. If he showed up to a road course with that car he'd get laughed off the track. Not to mention considering that powerband it would be just about undrivable on a road course.
How would the little intake vent give air to the radiator? In case you're unaware, the radiator is cooled by passing air through the fins in the body of it, not by passing air above it. Secondly, adding space below your intercooler would help cool the radiator, assuming your radiator hung below your intercooler. However, from the pictures I can quite easily tell that it does not. Once again, unless you're passing air over the body of the radiator, you're not doing any good.MKIV Surfer wrote:This will be my only post on the subject but:
Bzzt, wrong. Did you ever think that having the FMIC opening a good 2-3 inches lower than the FMIC is for cooling. Supra's have great cooling issues on the auto course. This was not done to make the car look lower........it was done to get more air to the radiator to keep the temps down. So it is not totally unnecessary..........if your auto coursing, it is actually pretty NECESSARY. And the "little intake vent" is just above the FMIC to give air flow to the radiator.
Yes, I know how a radiator works. :p Yes, the vent up top passes air THROUGH the radiator. But C-West makes piping to go from the vent to the intake to get cooling for the intake. But it was left that way because it gets air though the radiator.InsanityInc wrote:How would the little intake vent give air to the radiator? In case you're unaware, the radiator is cooled by passing air through the fins in the body of it, not by passing air above it. Secondly, adding space below your intercooler would help cool the radiator, assuming your radiator hung below your intercooler. However, from the pictures I can quite easily tell that it does not. Once again, unless you're passing air over the body of the radiator, you're not doing any good.
I really dont feeling like proving anything to you (my girlfriend is right here next to me and she's sick ) But the car is going to be set up for auto course and drag.......hence the mid-sized turbo.InsanityInc wrote:Really. Do you have proof that it's functional (just give me a better picture of it from a few angles and I can tell you if it is or not). Adjustable does not equal functional, also. Not to mention it still wouldn't matter unless you actually raced the car on a track.
Your view of turbo lag is different from mine. I agree with you.......if it was only an auto course car, it would have a 57-63mm turbo, but I want the car to be a little bit of a drag car too. Supra owners just have a different view of "turbo lag" then most other people, lol. This is considered a pretty quick spooling turbo in the MKIV Supra world.InsanityInc wrote:And no, it won't help you in stability at low speeds. All aerodynamic properties scale exponentially with speed, not just downforce and lift. Also, you don't seem to understand what a power band is. Having x HP at y RPM doesn't mean you have a good powerband. It's obvious from the dyno chart that the car has immense amounts of turbo lag (not really surprising from the size of the compressor) and a piss poor powerband.
Better to be too big than too small. It also leaves room for larger intercooler core upgrades. And the ram air vent would be much more functional if he didn't have that huge fan shroud.InsanityInc wrote:
Bzzt, wrong. Look at the front shot. The FMIC opening hangs a good 2-3 inches lower than the FMIC, which is totally unnecessary and was obviously done to make the car look lower. Also, that little intake vent is completely useless, look at the underhood shot and you can see it doesn't go anywhere. Not to mention the "look I'm an F1 car" front "downforce" wing things on the front lip are retarded. Yeah, really, your bumper made of fairly soft urethane attached by a few screws is really going to be designed to create lots of downforce, I swear.
Jesus, you've got to be kidding me...the largest vent on the hood is sitting right behind the radiator, where it will be most functional. The smaller vents are just to release ambient heat.InsanityInc wrote:Ha ha. No. Just because a hood has holes in it doesn't make it effectively vented. All of the vents on the hood are in the front 1/3, which will do absolutely jack and **** for venting. In order to be functional, vents need to be pretty far back on the hood so that air can flow through the bay and THEN flow out of it so as to actually produce a cooling effect.
How many cars go up to 160mph on roadcourses? There'd have to be one hell of a straightaway on that track. That wing functions properly when the Supra is in it's element...meaning high speed highway runs.InsanityInc wrote:I can't tell if the wing is functional or not as there aren't any particularly good shots of it. However, I'm betting it's non-functional considering the rest of the car. Also, has he ever been at speeds in excess of 160mph? I'm guessing not. If he showed up to a road course with that car he'd get laughed off the track. Not to mention considering that powerband it would be just about undrivable on a road course.
Well if you're taking off all the stuff that makes your car look like ***, you've got quite a ways to go there buddy.InsanityInc wrote:I have a DOHC, so no wierdo front lip, and I took off my factory rear spoiler because it looked like **** and served no purpose.