Already trying to discount that the fact that it is going to be a good interview?rn79870 wrote:McCain's camp obviously choose one of the more favorite news sites for this interview so it should go pretty good for her.
Thank you.rn79870 wrote:other than those related to family matters.
No. Nov 4th. When we win.rn79870 wrote:Oct 2nd. Z, Oct 2.
Well abc was the network that aired that Pathway to 9/11 garbageszhosain wrote:
Already trying to discount that the fact that it is going to be a good interview?
Can't believe how scared you guys are of Gov. Palin!
Z
Well, I am certainlyThe Wicker Man wrote:Well abc was the network that aired that Pathway to 9/11 garbage
ABC slants to the right? Amazing ... I would have said quite the opposite.The Wicker Man wrote:they're not going to ask her tough questions or anything. The network obviously slants to the right.
It sure seems to have awakened someone? McCain himself perhaps?rn79870 wrote:I wonder if her accepting the invitation was in response to Biden's challenge for her to step up to the mike (this morning on Meet the Press). I think it's fair to ask her to defend many of the issues she is carrying with her, other than those related to family matters. McCain's camp obviously choose one of the more favorite news sites for this interview so it should go pretty good for her.
audtatious wrote:Mountain, meet mole hill.
Obama has established that family & personal matters do not countsrellim234 wrote:Will he "hardball" her on the issues or will it focus more on family and personal stuff?
They need to ask her pointed questions about her social stances.wingFeather wrote:Obama has established that family & personal matters do not count
But anyway, the real question is... will the interview be FAIR and unbiased? Or, as usual, will it stoop to an agenda of knocking down a good woman?
If it's going to be a fair fight, then she will be successful in changing the minds of Obama voters who genuinely want a good leader & not just slick marketing and logos.
Translated, When we teach her about things that up to now have been foreign to her. The economy, Iraq, Health care, Energy issues, Social Security, What a VP actually does...Rick Davis wrote: Palin would be made available “when we think it’s time and when she feels comfortable doing it.”
You wish...rn79870 wrote:Translated, When we teach her about things that up to now have been foreign to her. The economy, Iraq, Health care, Energy issues, Social Security, What a VP actually does...
No one cares about social issues except the far left and far right, and those people are nuts anyway. She needs to offer an economic agenda, an international peace and security plan, and solutions for retards who bought houses they can't actually afford.HashiriyaS14 wrote:They need to ask her pointed questions about her social stances.
It WILL be fair, but it will expose the fact that her views reflect only those of a tiny minority of Americans.
The media needs to JUMP on this. She shouldn't be able to get on camera without someone hammering this subject between now and November.
Not according to RN's own rules.srellim234 wrote:It is perfectly logical for rn to make that statement.
Yeah, that's my point. They need to cast her as a nut, pigeonhole her with her social stances, as someone more interested in teaching creationism in schools than as someone who is capable of righting the economy.Jesda wrote:No one cares about social issues except the far left and far right, and those people are nuts anyway.
See there you go again with generalizations that are not supported in fact. Are you referring to eating mooseburgers, or to studying constitutional law? Experience at what? Be careful here because her experience claim has been widely challenged and documented with citations galore to the contrary, including a letter from one of her friends who resides in Wasilla.wingFeather wrote: She is a very intelligent, rational, educated woman who has more experience than BHO!
Right, but that doesn't work because the public doesn't care. It doesn't stick. Bush enjoyed a 65% approval rating while he went on national TV opposing gay marriage.HashiriyaS14 wrote:Yeah, that's my point. They need to cast her as a nut, pigeonhole her with her social stances, as someone more interested in teaching creationism in schools than as someone who is capable of righting the economy.
His empty conjecture is followed by your empty conjecture. Someone should lock you both in a dark closet with a box of tasers.rn79870 wrote:
See there you go again with generalizations that are not supported in fact. Are you referring to eating mooseburgers, or to studying constitutional law? Experience at what? Be careful here because her experience claim has been widely challenged and documented with citations galore to the contrary, including a letter from one of her friends who resides in Wasilla.
Would work better if one of them is an 11 year old stepson.Jesda wrote:His empty conjecture is followed by your empty conjecture. Someone should lock you both in a dark closet with a box of tasers.