Open letter to Honda owners (and other ricetards).

Want to talk about non-Nissan cars? Here's the place!
User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post



User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post

lol.solid.

if I end up with a honda I'm just gonna race on the track, unless someone pulls an attack on me (happens a lot over here surprisingly)

I mean, cruising at a decent clip on the highway, someone races behind you, you both try to get ahead to get past w/e obstacle (roundabout etc)and then take off after that...it's exhilirating lol.I'll never forget the time my friends toyota cavalier got beat by a maxima couldn't help but laugh inside.

User avatar
xekushnr
Posts: 5084
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 7:51 am
Car: '90 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Contact:

Post

PantherRacer wrote:I'll never forget the time my friends toyota cavalier got beat by a maxima
i didnt know toyota made a cav too. j-bodies are crossing borders! oh nos!

good read though. it was funny.

User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post

yeah, the toyota cavalier is quite powerful actually. and it's uuber JDM modified and cool. my friend made me want one...sunroof, manual transmission, rhd, yamaha engine (unless yamaha stopped making toyota engines), and I'd throw a turbo in there for good measure . Too bad it's fwd...

Displacement, cc 2392 Engine model T2 Max.power (Net), kw(PS)/rpm 150 ps (110.33 kw) / 6000 rpm Max.torque(Net), N*m(kg*m)/rpm 22.1 kg*m (216.73 N*m) / 4400 rpm Power density 8.73 Engine type Water cooling serial 4 cylinder DOHC16 valve Engine information Fuel system EFI (electronic fuel injection) Turbocharger No Fuel type Unleaded regular gasoline LEV system (Low emission vehicle) No Compression ratio 9.5 Bore, mm 90 Stroke, mm 94 Final gear ratio Fuel consumption at 10-15 modes, l/100km 10.2

driverdriver
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:36 am
Car: NICO's longtime resident Canuck!!!
Contact:

Post

I've raced ricers in my Jeep. The I-6 with improved low rev throttle in the '99-01's out accelerates a Honda even with the Jeep's brick like aerodynamics. Slip into 4wd and the launch is amazing, its like chaeting. I've beat ricers and I've literally destroyed riced out Honda's by leading them down pot holed filled country roads-one of the benefits of driving a Jeep. I've had the pleasure of watching body kit components on lowered civics fall off in my rear view mirror.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

driverdriver wrote:I've literally destroyed riced out Honda's by leading them down pot holed filled country roads-one of the benefits of driving a Jeep. I've had the pleasure of watching body kit components on lowered civics fall off in my rear view mirror.

User avatar
Fenvy
Posts: 5052
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 9:30 am
Car: 2005 350Z Base 6MT

Post

more honda s*** talking?

I like honda

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I like Honda, but too many Honda owners are boneheads.

M3Racer
Posts: 2231
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Car: 1999 Acura TL 3.2
BMW E46 M3 Convertible

Post

Article wrote:Instead of buying a genuinely fast car, you choose to get your rocks off racing easy vehicles in your piece of s***. Way to go, badass! I'm proud of you! Why don't we get together and beat up some kids later. I'll let you sucker punch a baby. It will be hard core.

User avatar
Gold Digger
Posts: 5823
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:48 pm
Car: Current:
2011 Infiniti G25X

Former:
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple
1990 Nissan Laurel Club S Turbo Two Tone Pearl

Post

Jesda wrote:I like Honda, but too many Honda owners are boneheads.
I used to hate Hondas, then after awhile, I learned it's not the cars I hated, it was the dumb asses who think their bone stock Civic with "Tezza's" and a fart can rollin on a stock set of steelies and an erector ser for a wing providing 16,000 pounds of downforce are faster than a Mustang Cobra R. I actually have come to respect the cars and engines slowly.

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

i need a track slut...i have the choice of getting a civic hatch or something and running honda challenge, or getting a miata and running spec miata, both of which normally have fairly good turnouts, or getting a sentra or another s13 and running se-r cup, which has much more west coast presence than east coast

se-r cup is still on top though, its very laid back rules wise...

and i dont know how much pain i would endure on here for building a road race honda...decisions decisions

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

If anybody gives you s*** about building up a honda, they're a moron.

It's not the car we hate, it's the typical ricetard owners.

Go build up a honda and be a decent honda owner.

At least, it that's what you're looking to do. Personally, the classic SE-R or an NA miata sounds like a much more enjoyable project.

User avatar
vicQ45
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:43 pm
Car: 1979 Cadillac Eldog, 1987 Wagovan, 1968 Firebird 400

Post

after owning a max and a q45 and now an accord, i can't fathom any reason why the 93 accord is worth MORE than the 93 maxima! the cars are in a completely different league. the maxima has even proven to be just as long-lasting(especially when comparing ATs). it has a few inherent problems, but so does the accord. fwd sucks, torque steer sucks, it's ugly, it has NO torque under 3k. it's just a dog to drive. all this for an extra 2-3mpg. not to mention parts are $$$ for this ugly little box... $85 for a case of transmission fluid? what are these "cheap" hondas we keep hearing about. i could go on for 10 pages, but that's enough ranting for now.

funny letter! those ricers always give me a good larf.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I sold my 93 Accord after one month of ownership. I bought it from the same dealer after the Acura Legend I was going to buy took a dump (transmission died right before I took delivery). The Legend was a bit dull anyway, oh well.

The Accord was competent on the open road (very good ride quality) and efficient on fuel, but the brakes were poop and the transmission, while properly geared, seemed to jerk around a lot. Something about the aerodynamics irked me too, as it was prone to being tossed around by the wind gusts of passing semi trucks.

I'd buy an older Accord for a teenager or poor person in a heartbeat, but it fails as proper transportation for a man with discerning tastes.

Right now, I'm driving my dad's Civic hatchback around, and its surprisingly good for its class.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I just find it funny...

A friend of mine thinks his dad's '03 Accord base model is a fast car. Everytime we get within sight of it, or any time he drives it (he has his own car, but he's got to take the accord to show off in when I go with him anywhere...) he's constantly saying things like "This thing can MOVE!" and "I love this car, it's damn fast."

This is the same kid who thought his auto trans Saturn SL2 (the 2 is DOHC) was fast. In his words "well you would be me in a long race, but I could take you off the line" (referring to my Maxima). He also put the car in neutral at every red light, and then would rev to 2 or 3k RPM and slam it into drive when the light turned green again.

Anyway, I find that damn funny. What I find more funny is that he got horribly insulted when I responded to one of his many "This thing can MOVE!" comments with "Let me get my Maxima and we'll have us a race."

Stupid kids actually think they are FAST cars. They actually think they're designed for sportiness. Think about that for half a second. If the accord was supposed to be sporty, don't you think Honda would have given us Americans the REAL accord, and not a rebadged Inspire?

It makes me laugh. And so does the fact that the brand new accord 4 cyl makes no more power than my old SOHC Maxima (out of half a liter less, with the amazing vtec and all sorts of technologies, it makes a whopping 160 hp and 161 lb ft of torque), but wieghs a fair amount more.

Stupid kids and their damned misinformed "opinions". They'd probably die of orgasmic glee after a spirited ride in a Z32TT.

He's still a damn retard though.

I'd rather have an 89 GXE Maxima than a 2003 accord. Hell...I'd rather have a U12 Stanza! At least the good ol' KA doesn't have any VTEC s*** to ruin low end torque.

User avatar
vicQ45
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:43 pm
Car: 1979 Cadillac Eldog, 1987 Wagovan, 1968 Firebird 400

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:I'd rather have an 89 GXE Maxima than a 2003 accord. Hell...I'd rather have a U12 Stanza! At least the good ol' KA doesn't have any VTEC s*** to ruin low end torque.
ditto on that! tough to beat the good ol VG! i seriously want to run my accord into a wall every time i accelerate. it doesn't move at all under 3k! its just sickening. i drove my friend's vortec suburban the other day and i almost had a low-end torque orgasm! thats how pitiful this thing is! they tried to smooth out the steering so much that it torque steers every chance it gets. the car just plain can't stop, but that probably has more to do with the crappy goodyear rock-hard like 1,000,000mi value tires the previous owner put on. my max got 17/25mpg in the real world and the accord gets 19.5/27mpg. hardly any difference there. i still say vtec is a joke. its just high revs to excite those stoplight-happy ricers that think vtec=blown magnum 440. and last time i checked, vtec was just clever marketing for vvt. nothing too unique or special there? just a mass-marketed fancy name for it to attract teenagers who can't afford to buy a real car so they pretend their grocery-getter is a porsche gt2. personally, i'm glad to see a little muscle car rebirth after GM killed off their only gutsy iconic beauty after 35 years to replace it with a "cuter, sportier" gto.

dammit, every time i start talking about my accord i just start a good old rant. MoD keep the max til it just gives up and dies. if i hadn't been rear-ended in mine, i'd still be driving it and loving every second of it!

someone needs to post one of those "vtec just kicked in, yo!" pics. those always crack me up!

User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post

VTEC PWNS JOO FEWL!

User avatar
vicQ45
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:43 pm
Car: 1979 Cadillac Eldog, 1987 Wagovan, 1968 Firebird 400

Post

aaaah yea that hit the spot perfectly!

M3Racer
Posts: 2231
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:13 pm
Car: 1999 Acura TL 3.2
BMW E46 M3 Convertible

Post

I <3 my Acura

JESTER
Posts: 3266
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 5:08 am
Car: 2004 Chevy Colorado Bright a** Red 3.5 five cylinder

Post

I hate the idiot Honda owners, and we all know which little tards I am referring to.

I like some of thier models, but these little punks that get them and wnat to trick them out, and do nothing but screw them up, really get on my nerves.

If you are gonna get a Honda and mod it, do it right, and make it into a nice car, instead of a rolling piece of junk that shouldnt be on the roads.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

PantherRacer wrote:yeah, the toyota cavalier is quite powerful actually. and it's uuber JDM modified and cool. my friend made me want one...
I wonder why we don't see more JDM tyte RHD converted Chevy cavaliers with JDM tyte Toyota badging on them?

User avatar
vicQ45
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:43 pm
Car: 1979 Cadillac Eldog, 1987 Wagovan, 1968 Firebird 400

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
I wonder why we don't see more JDM tyte RHD converted Chevy cavaliers with JDM tyte Toyota badging on them?
went to the j-body forums a while back. pretty sad actually. LOTS of "JDM" toyota badging going on there. the cavalier is easily hands-down the worst driving experience i've ever had

User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post

it's because the Japanese guys are into USDM badging and USDM style big bodykits and giant wings...Yup, We want JDM, and they want USDM and Spo-Com styling...what's the future hold?????

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

Vtec is in the cam design.

it's got an extra profile in it..I can't remember exactly how it works, but it's not just timing. I believe it'll open up the lift and duration a little bit...it tries to have civilized low end drivability while being able to open up and feel sporty without crazy idling and still get good economy...

it almost works. Ii however aggravates the piss outta me and is not smooth in the slightest.

if anyone wants to drive something with an incredibly smooth powerband and ample torque...drive an SC....it's good from stop to about 4500 rpm shift points (I really need a cam with more duration on it...and a litttle more lift too )


User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

VTEC is a twin-lobe system. Each valve has two lobes: the Standard lobe, and the "VTEC" lobe. They sit next to eachother, and are a few degrees apart (rotationally) and have different shapes to vary duration and lift and such.At whatever point VTEC chooses to "activate", The camshafts shift, and the VTEC lobe takes over.

Basically, it's Honda's desperate attempt to build engines with the VQ's amazing powerband and combination of civility and tire-destroying goodness.

It fails. It STILL feels anemic at low RPM, even compared to the aged SOHC VG-E. And the high end is there--it just takes too damn long to get there. Honda redlines make the VQ's 62k redline look low.

There's just something twisted and torturous about waiting for an engine to finally find it's peak RPM range.

The stupid thing about all this is that EVERYONE uses some form of VTEC.Honda is just the only ones who have become dependent on it to produce a decent engine, and the only ones who have used media campaigns to turn it into a mysterious superpower that all ricers should desire.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

I much prefered my B18A....it was a good motor.

had good torque still...I think 130 or so....not quite the T Bird however

driverdriver
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:36 am
Car: NICO's longtime resident Canuck!!!
Contact:

Post

vicQ45 wrote:
went to the j-body forums a while back. pretty sad actually. LOTS of "JDM" toyota badging going on there. the cavalier is easily hands-down the worst driving experience i've ever had
The J-body forums are fun to go to for a good heartylaugh out loud laugh. These J-body "enthusiasts" swear there are cars are the best handling and best vehicles ever made. It makes me sad to know that none of these people have owned or experienced a real car.

Sil40_Mayhem
Posts: 3165
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 9:35 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX 5spd
1992 Acura Integra LS

Post

Having (shamefully enough) owned and driven a J body before, all I can say is teh über sux0r weaksauce... No power, anemic braking, and handling like a water balloon on wheels.

On a positive note, it did somehow manage to provide decent fuel economy and over 138K worry-free miles.

User avatar
vicQ45
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:43 pm
Car: 1979 Cadillac Eldog, 1987 Wagovan, 1968 Firebird 400

Post

its not just the ugliness and sad performance of the j-bodys i can't stand. i put up with both those just fine in my honda(jbodies are still much uglier though). my biggest complaint about those cars is the seating and visibility. the seat is arched back and placed as close to the floor as possible to make the car "seem" bigger on the inside. the end result is almost zero visibility. you end up looking at the sky, not the road. i'm 6'2" and this shouldn't be a problem for me. j-bodies and neons have the worst visibility of any car i've ever driven. i simply can't stand to drive them. i guess we now know where all that mysterious front-end damage on j-bodies comes from. you have to guess where the freakin end of the hood is! j-bodies will go quite a while with no major mechanical problems, but all the interior pieces(radio, blower motor, etc) die off pretty quick. not a bad price at the ridiculoussly low msrp however. i'd rather spend 7-8k on a new cav than 16k on a new base civic and save the left over money for a real car.

StatixNWH
Posts: 2779
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:24 pm

Post

hondas are good cars and ther enot slow if you put alot of money into them, but still hondas are cool.


Return to “Others”