Oil Additive Experiment-Interesting

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
driverdriver
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:36 am
Car: NICO's longtime resident Canuck!!!
Contact:

Post

I don't know if you guys have seen this, but I came across it today. It's an interesting experiment with interesting results.

Link:http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/...s.htm


User avatar
PalmerWMD
Posts: 14329
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 3:14 pm
Car: 2004 350Z

Post

Yes I linked it here some months ago.Itsa good link and busts a couple myths.\

Thanks for bringing back up for the newer members.

Fred..:thumbup

User avatar
Jeff Williams
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 4:17 am
Car: 1994 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti I30t
2004 Infiniti M45
71, 72, 73, 82 & 2000 Corvettes
Contact:

Post

I see the results, BUT, the point is that Lucas causes the oil to climb the gears. That is what it advertises.

The synthetic oil "frothed" without the Lucas additive.

If you start with poor oil, or oil that tends to "froth", adding Lucas, will not stop it from "frothing".

I would like to see this test, with non-synthetic oils, that don't "froth" already. Then add Lucas, to see if it starts to "froth".

I am not convinced, that adding Lucas made any difference, except to keep oil on the gears - which was much better than the synthetic oil by itself.

This does not convince me that there is anything wrong with Lucas oil treatment.

I have used Lucas, for years. It has helped keep many of 300,000 mile plus cars going. I don't put in as much as suggested, but I do add a 1/2 cup, or so, with every oil change. I don't use it in the Q, but I do use it in my old GMC truck. I have never seen any bubbles in the oil, even on a race engine, that is still a few hundred degrees, right after a race. I think the gear test he uses is a little flakey, for motor oil. Maybe right on, for gear oil, though.


Return to “General Chat”