First Versa was by no means a cherry, but I chalked it up to known early-production problems, and was hoping that my late-production '07 V would be much better. Sadly it's not.frankohabs wrote:I just had the pleasure of going for a road test: the car is shaking on start, to about 30 km/hr (and getting worse).
"just normal", I'm told . . . a CVT thing.
Wonderful.
But at least they didn't charge me.
EV -- rather than going back through and searching for the answer -- why did you buy a second Versa? Was the first one a cherry to your present lemon?
Yup -- he told me it was normal on all CVTs; not as bad on the Altima; hardly noticeable on the MuranoEver Victorious wrote:
the CVT didn't shake on start to 30 KM/h. If that's supposed to be normal, I guess that means the loaner was defective, right?
Even with the use of my A/C (no defogging needed here in vegas) I have seen my mpg go from 29/30 to 32/33 over the past month. I don't know why he would tell you that your mpg should drop for the summer unless he was either stupid or intentionally trying to mislead you.shiryu0 wrote:isnt ethanol added for winter????? i always see mpg's jump during the summer were i live, my Lincoln runs excellent on summer gas, plus 110 degree weather , cant say about our Versa yet, but i expect the same........
Actually, I have a very good barometer to test this. My co-worker, another field engineer, uses his '92 (?) VW Fox to do his job. The thing will not run right on ethanolized gas. So I know which stations have ethanol and which don't, based on how his car runs after filling up. I make it a point to use the non ethanolized gas, because the V gets bad mileage on the ethanolized stuff.brainguyus wrote:That sucks because right now states are not required to disclose how much, if any, ethanol is mixed with the fuel, so you don't really know if the dealer is blowing smoke up your hinder.
A little of column A, a little of column B. I got so pissed on the phone that I had to shut up or I would have said something REALLY bad, and made it impossible to get them to waive the labor (which they eventually did anyway).Great White Versa wrote:
Even with the use of my A/C (no defogging needed here in vegas) I have seen my mpg go from 29/30 to 32/33 over the past month. I don't know why he would tell you that your mpg should drop for the summer unless he was either stupid or intentionally trying to mislead you.
I Strongly Agree...15% is a helluva hit! Consider also that the ECU will usually do a pretty good job of compensating for a dirty air filter.Ever Victorious wrote:Yet despite this, the economy keeps dropping. Yeah, I know, it's almost time to replace my 2nd air filter, but come on... it's not going to make THAT much of a difference.
I hate it when people say things like this. Why? Because I've been a mechanic, and I can tell you right now that this kind of thing does nothing but take time that you could be spending actually fixing another car, and actually making some money. You wouldn't be saying things like, "It's bulls*it for them to charge us..." if you were the technician, I can assure you that you'd want your time compensated.Vahagn23 wrote:The only thing I can see a loss of fuel efficiency is to use your A/C and such, becaue wehn I use the A/C on the full I feel that I have to push the gas harder to go faster. I find it bull**** that for a diognastics they have to charge us. Its the biggest load of crap, they can say nothing is wrong with your car so you pay us for looking, where if something was wrong with the car they would have to fix it for free. Thats why I would take the car to a different mechanic to check it.
It is a vehicle that is still under factory warranty. I am unaware of how techs at dealerships are compensated for work, but that should not be my concern with a car that I bought particularly for a warranty. It is not my responsibility to compensate the techs' time, it's Nissan's.07V84Z wrote:I hate it when people say things like this. Why? Because I've been a mechanic, and I can tell you right now that this kind of thing does nothing but take time that you could be spending actually fixing another car, and actually making some money. You wouldn't be saying things like, "It's bulls*it for them to charge us..." if you were the technician, I can assure you that you'd want your time compensated.
I fix computers, not cars, for a living... but we also have problems with customers taking our time looking at systems that aren't actually broken, that are warranty claims. What do we do? We look at the system. If there's nothing wrong, we don't charge them. It's not worth charging someone $65 today and running the risk that they won't come back for any other purchases of any kind.APEXi240 wrote:It is a vehicle that is still under factory warranty. I am unaware of how techs at dealerships are compensated for work, but that should not be my concern with a car that I bought particularly for a warranty. It is not my responsibility to compensate the techs' time, it's Nissan's.