octane

ONLY for ADVANCED technical discussion about the 240sx!
karate_kid
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 6:27 pm

Post

I have a normal stock 240sx and I am wondering what octane gas i should use. Right now I am using the lowest 87 octane.


nnkfws333
Posts: 723
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:29 pm
Car: 2004 Infiniti G35 and a 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

you can use 87 octane but it works best with anything above 91

karate_kid
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 6:27 pm

Post

Do i get better mileage if i use a higher octane?

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

No... putting higher octane fuel in a car that doesnt knock wont result in more power unless the ECU actively senses the added octane. The KA does not do this.

If you have a S14 the recommended fuel is 91 octane or higher.

User avatar
Mayhem_J30
Posts: 2643
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 2:00 am
Car: Ummm...My Car
Location: Louisville, KY

Post

Nismo_Freak wrote:No... putting higher octane fuel in a car that doesnt knock wont result in more power unless the ECU actively senses the added octane. The KA does not do this.


What do you mean? I thought it probably wouldn't knock anyway, because the ECU will retard the timing enough to compensate for the octane deficiency?? So when at optimized timing and 91+ octane wouldn't the most power and MPG be increased to?

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

The ECU only retards timing when the motor knocks. He said "In a car that doesnt knock". I run 91.

User avatar
Mayhem_J30
Posts: 2643
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 2:00 am
Car: Ummm...My Car
Location: Louisville, KY

Post

Cyberkreig wrote:The ECU only retards timing when the motor knocks. He said "In a car that doesnt knock". I run 91.


but how do you know it's not knocking because of the timing adjustments? Maybe it did knock (slightly) enought for the ECU to take care of it. Only way to know is to log the knock sensor voltage.

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

Good question, and over my head. =)

s0ldats
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 6:14 pm

Post

Mayhem_J30 wrote:but how do you know it's not knocking because of the timing adjustments? Maybe it did knock (slightly) enought for the ECU to take care of it. Only way to know is to log the knock sensor voltage.


word.

i've been using 87 until i read that 91 was recommended per the user manual. i noticed a large difference in performance. my car was less chuggy and revved more freely.

karate_kid
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 6:27 pm

Post

will 91 give me more mileage then 87?

User avatar
Antjaw
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 3:20 am
Contact:

Post

I have noticed an increase in gas mileage with high octane... Also the knock that was there has gone away

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Nissan ECU's tend to overcompensate for knock when it is detected. You'll probably feel some hesitation if it does.

As far as using high octane fuels, you won't notice a difference unless you are detonating and the knock sensor is retarding timing, or unless you advance the timing. Advancing the timing would increase the peak cylinder pressure and using a higher octane will allow you to advance timing further than with regular fuel. Don't expect any miracles with this though.

User avatar
Mayhem_J30
Posts: 2643
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 2:00 am
Car: Ummm...My Car
Location: Louisville, KY

Post

karate_kid wrote:will 91 give me more mileage then 87?


I would say yes as this is what your motor was designed for.

User avatar
ricebike
Posts: 3381
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2003 7:03 pm
Car: 1989 240sx se 5spd (donated to my brother in law)
2002 Quest
2005 Altima
Location: CNJ

Post

89-90 SOHC engines did not come w/ a knock sensor... plus my 1989 manual says i can use 87 octane.

however, my car does run better on higher octane... maybe a placebo effect or there's carbon buildup

DAEDALUS
Posts: 5421
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:50 pm
Car: 1990 Infiniti Q45

Post

Everything else being equal, higher octane gas should show a small improvement in mileage. If you wanted to cruise at 60mph on the freeway, it will take less 91-octane gas to provide that power than the amount of 87-octane gas required. I ran tests on a generator as part of a college course that proved this. However, don't use a tiny increase in mileage as sole justification to pay more per gallon. The cost is maybe 20% more, but the mileage increase would probably be a low single digit percentage.

User avatar
Mayhem_J30
Posts: 2643
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 2:00 am
Car: Ummm...My Car
Location: Louisville, KY

Post

DAEDALUS wrote:Everything else being equal, higher octane gas should show a small improvement in mileage. If you wanted to cruise at 60mph on the freeway, it will take less 91-octane gas to provide that power than the amount of 87-octane gas required. I ran tests on a generator as part of a college course that proved this. However, don't use a tiny increase in mileage as sole justification to pay more per gallon. The cost is maybe 20% more, but the mileage increase would probably be a low single digit percentage.


what about engine life? Wouldn't this be increased as well while running on 91+?

Emperor240
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 12:34 pm

Post

ok here's a lilttle info, the octane rating on gasoline is a burn rate mesurement. believe it or not it takes 91+ longer to burn then it does 89 this reduces the chance of detonation on a higher compression engine (thats why in the old days you had to run 94 in a 10:1 compression car, the didnt have knock sensors) so when you run the proper octane for your compression and other specs you get better performance and gas mileage and it may in some cases prolong life of certan parts but i dont know if it will for the engine as a whole

User avatar
Mayhem_J30
Posts: 2643
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 2:00 am
Car: Ummm...My Car
Location: Louisville, KY

Post

Read up kidshttp://www.nissaninfiniticlub....ctanehttp://www.nissaninfiniticlub....ctanehttp://www.nissaninfiniticlub....ctane

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

i live in LOUISIANA and have an o2 2.5s and i pay roughly $1.70 a gallon for 93octane (premium obviously, and i never put less than 91 octane)

GELLIS2586
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 7:02 pm
Car: 2006 IS350 / previously 1997 240sx se pearl white

Post

Ok so since my ecu from a ka24de out of a 97 doesn't retard the timing running octane booster would have a negative effect on the engine because of to low compression. Or am i just sompletely wrong here.


Return to “240SX Technical Forum”