Octane...

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
User avatar
Kienai
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:54 pm
Car: 96 Corolla, 92 Sil-Eighty

Post

This is a real stupid question, but.. What octane gasoline does everyone put in their stock KA? Just kind of wondering... Cuz I read somewhere that its better to put higher octane gas in your KA, it gets better gas mileage.. I just put 87 in mine, I really don't see a point in putting higher octane in a non-turboed engine.


240marcuSX
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 11:00 am
Car: E34 525i
E46 M3

Post

not only turbo engines require higher octane.

i use 87, because it really doesnt make a difference on a stock ka outside of ones mind.

User avatar
yeap
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 5:56 am
Car: A sweet 2004 red tricycle.

Post

I always put 91 in my car.

xyoufailmex
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:56 am
Car: 1990 240 FB

Post

You're actually going to end up losing gas mileage and horsepower if your car doesnt need higher octane gas... And octane doesnt have anything to do with turbo or not... it's compression levels... High compression engines have to have high octane gas as well. Not trying to be nit picky, just dont want somebody who doesnt know to misunderstand.

guyaverage
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:48 am
Car: Nissan 240SX Convertible

Post

In my 93 hatch, 93 octane made a world of difference. It felt downright lethargic on 87. I switched back and forth too many times for it to be in my head. It definitely made a difference.

In my 93 convertible, I have switched back and forth several times and can feel no difference whatsoever, so 87 it is. Using anything higher than what is required to prevent detonation is a waste.

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post

87 octane here and made 130 rwhp on a stock KA.

base9se
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 5:33 am
Car: '95 240sx
Contact:

Post

91 octane and up!

TheOne
Posts: 1836
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:28 pm
Car: 93 240sx FB
Location: Arlington, TX

Post

87 should be good for the stock ka, maybe 89 would do better.but addin higher octane can loose hp because the fuel would take more time to ignite than lower octane, that is why turbo/high compression engines use higher octane.....so it isn't prone to ignite faster/easier because of higher temps/compression.

SloMoe
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 12:11 pm
Car: Fast Cars, Music, Girls

Post

The ECU actually compensates for it. Our ECU's have 2 different fuel and timing maps for hi and low octane fuels. Ever wonder why the fuel door says "Premium fuel recommended for maximum performance" ? It's not just for looks

xyoufailmex
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:56 am
Car: 1990 240 FB

Post

Well, its not like that on any other car, and it doesnt make sense how an ECU can change the properties of the engines makeup which would affect octane... Im gonna check on my fuel door when I get time, never noticed it if it does, and it doesnt make sense why it would.

swannjay
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 6:06 am
Contact:

Post

octane level is just a measurement of the fuel's ability to resist knock or pinging. some engines only require regular unleaded while others require premium. its best to do what the manufactuer recommends.

SloMoe
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 12:11 pm
Car: Fast Cars, Music, Girls

Post

xyoufailmex wrote:Well, its not like that on any other car, and it doesnt make sense how an ECU can change the properties of the engines makeup which would affect octane... Im gonna check on my fuel door when I get time, never noticed it if it does, and it doesnt make sense why it would.


Its not changing the engines makeup, its changing the fuel and timing maps to more agressive ones. If its running a high octane map and detects knock it switches to a low octane map. Higher octane fuel burns quicker, so the ECU advances timing to take advantage of it. Ive played around and re-programmed KA ECUs, and all the Nissan ECUs Ive come across have the eeprom programmed with a hi and low octane fuel and timing map.

User avatar
grip_racer
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 5:34 am
Car: 1997 Audi A4 1.8TM

Post

SloMoe wrote:

Its not changing the engines makeup, its changing the fuel and timing maps to more agressive ones. If its running a high octane map and detects knock it switches to a low octane map. Higher octane fuel burns quicker, so the ECU advances timing to take advantage of it. Ive played around and re-programmed KA ECUs, and all the Nissan ECUs Ive come across have the eeprom programmed with a hi and low octane fuel and timing map.
actually, high octane fuel burns slower to prevent detonation.

i think there's more factors to how fast a fuel actually burns though. i read something about how some fuels were made specifically for high-rpm motors because they upped the burn rate with some other factor than octane.

or something. i didnt quite understand it comepletely.

any fuel engineers on this forum?

but do ka24de ecu's really have two maps?

SloMoe
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 12:11 pm
Car: Fast Cars, Music, Girls

Post

grip_racer wrote:
actually, high octane fuel burns slower to prevent detonation.
Duh yea thats what I meat sorry long day at work.
grip_racer wrote:but do ka24de ecu's really have two maps?
Yes they do, in fact most Nissan ECU including SR and CA ecus have a high and low octane map.

4gotn1
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:01 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx (coupe)
Contact:

Post

i know my ka24e runs alot better on 93, it has alot more power to pull to redline (7k). it dosent pull as hard with lower octane. i have also noticed it runs better on spefic brands, it loves amaco and unreformulated chevron. everthing else make it sluggish.

User avatar
CDE
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:24 am
Car: 1989 240SX

Post

I would probrably use a higher octane if it wasn't for the price of it. Gas prices have SUCKED here and for 93 it's over 1.06 dollars for 1 litre.

4gotn1
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:01 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx (coupe)
Contact:

Post

im paying 2.09 per gallon here, but i think its justified. my car runs so much better on it

SloMoe
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 12:11 pm
Car: Fast Cars, Music, Girls

Post

2.09 a gallon is nothing compaired to what hes paying. It's about 3.8 liters to 1 gallon, so thats about 4.03 a gallon!

4gotn1
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:01 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx (coupe)
Contact:

Post

did i read that right?

DAMN... ill shut up now

User avatar
scruffy63
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 8:12 am
Car: my nissan 240sx

Post

well you have to realize over in cali they pay more for everything but they also make more money. so that evens it out a bit.

User avatar
AelSic
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 1:17 pm
Car: 2006 Titan Crewcab

Post

He was talking about Canada Scruffy. Would all of you quit being cheap bastards and just buy the premium. That is exactly what our engines are built for and I am going to have to go with sloemoe there is a big reason the MANUFACTURER would tell you to use higher octane fuel.

4gotn1
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:01 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx (coupe)
Contact:

Post

if you read my post i run 93 in my car...aka premium

skatanic28
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 5:35 am
Car: 96 240sx

Post

premium for me too.

xxdjstriderxx
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:23 pm
Car: 91 240sx coupe

Post

i run 91, every few tanks ill add in a bottle of fuel injector blah blah blah cleaner.

when im poor, ill use 89 but i try to stay away from that. =( my engine has 168k so i want to feed it good clean stuff.

2s4x0
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:09 am
Car: 1998 240sx

Post

My factory manual for my 1998 240sx says premium, and i also have switched so much i can really tell a difference, and for an extra 2 dollars a week, its worth piece of mind and it feels better.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”