480sx wrote:Hmm maybe there isnt a sensor that determines if the EGR system is actually recirculating gas and the system will 'work' regardless of if it flows anything or not. I know my customer had the same basic thing done to his car for a while, it was just plugged. I dont think he had any codes either, with the Greddy kit on a 97.
My guess is its a passive sensor of some sort. Perhaps detecting an EGR failure indirectly or only sensing if the EGR isn't opening or something. A blocked EGR would still register as opening, but wouldn't be reducing the NOx emissions.
480sx wrote:As far as the O2 sensor goes i was speculating, i know a screwed up cat can trip up the post cat o2 sensor or trip random ECU codes, so i figured removing it might do the same. Guess not on a 240.
I actually expected the same, but it never came up. I wasn't about to question it.
480sx wrote:I hate DDing a car without a cat. Kinda like, hey, eff you to everyone behind me all the time lol. I also like to minimize the amount of black smoke my car puts out after i roll it from vacuum to hard boost. In addition, a high flow cat + resonator with a 3 inch exhaust and a decent muffler sounds great. In most situations as well, a high flow cat isnt really going to disrupt flow or decrease HP by what i would call a significant level. Anything thats consistently over 350-400 hp going out a 3 inch, i would consider removing the cat, but below that HP level i just cant see it being worth it. Ignoring the fact that its a federal offense lol.
Problem for me was the downpipe pretty much eliminated the use of the factory cat. Which meant I had to use an aftermarket cat (which likely had much less precious metal content; which could mean it might wear faster). Couple this with the increased NOx and HC load from the turbo (and the use of an FMU) and I decided to pull the aftermarket cat so I can save it for the next smog test (the smog shop I used ignored the visual but still checked the actual emissions). Made much more sense to me to do that rather than risk having to buy a new cat each time. Not to mention if I got pulled over and my underhood shcked out, then it was illegal regardless, with or without the cat. And few people stayed behind me for very long.
480sx wrote:Really am curious as to what code you threw as you say.. kinda... excuse me if i have this wrong, 'Because you installed a FMU'. I dont know thats not really making any sense to me heh. There is no fuel pressure sensor or ties with the fuel pump-ecu besides on/off. Idk, just wondering. Maybe there is an electrical load difference on the injectors significant enough to trip up the ECU from 38 psi of fuel pressure to eh.. 80-100 with boost and a FMU?
I wish I could remember. For all I know, it could have been EGR related. But the inference I was making was that the code didn't exist because of the FMU. But rather using the E-Manage got rid of it. Which is why I mentioned my speculation that the signals that were monitored were simply within range in relation to the MAF signal since the ECU sees less airflow with the E-Manage coupled to larger injectors for a given actual airflow. AS an aside, I would expect similar results with a SAFC as it essentiallyscompensates the same way.