Obama's victory didn't magically eliminate America's problems and enemies.

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
heliochrome85
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:18 pm
Car: 2006 G35 Sport Coupe Athens Blue/Slate with Sport and Premium Packages--SOLD

Post

Stumbled upon this

via Slate.com

While i dont necessarily always agree with Hitchens, he is spot on in this article.http://www.slate.com/id/2204240/

My fellow Obama supporters should be cautiously optimistic about his Presidency and his opponents should recognize the reasons they lost and address them.


User avatar
dusred
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Car: Previous Q45 owner, 09 Corolla, Ford F250 Diesel truck

Post

heliochrome85 wrote:Obama's victory didn't magically eliminate America's problems and enemies.
My first thought was "WTF? But you promised?"

Talk about Hope, Change, and Yes We Can. Those words are all we need and our country will be fixed. . . so the public thinks.

User avatar
heliochrome85
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:18 pm
Car: 2006 G35 Sport Coupe Athens Blue/Slate with Sport and Premium Packages--SOLD

Post

thanks for that very thoughtful contribution. i enjoyed reading it.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Back to Tariq's point, he's right on.

In fact, I'm of the opinion the next 365 days are critical - If only because our "enemies" will try and test the new Pres.

I'm pretty certain that certain anti-American factions will behave a little differently during a BO administration than a JM administration, if only because they KNOW he'd have a "scorched earth" policy...

Some may percieve BO's willingness to legitimize ignorant despots through "discussions" as weakness, and try to exploit it.

The best thing he can do is if something goes down (God forbid), to react swiftly, strongly, and decisively.

pancho y onions
Posts: 821
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:45 am
Car: 1992 240sx se

Post

What people need to know is that people running for president will always say what ever you want to hear to win a vote. I never voted since no candidat won my vote. If these guys really cared about us they would of spent those millions of dollars to help out those fammilies in need, put that to help out our economy a bit, etc. Then i would say "wow this guy really cares , maybe he will make things a bit beter".

User avatar
heliochrome85
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:18 pm
Car: 2006 G35 Sport Coupe Athens Blue/Slate with Sport and Premium Packages--SOLD

Post

he has to very carefully navigate those waters of high level talks with our enemies. i suspect to a certain degree, Iran is like North Korea, desperate for US attention. Look, the North Koreans took the nuclear option off the table as soon as we were like, "yeah we want to talk to you." Iran is much the same retarted thinking. They are trying their hardest to provoke the US into paying attention, but what they really want is high level talks. Look at the responses given world wide by leaders following obama's election. All POSITIVE. that being said, there are always cases where these discussions would pose a tactical and security risk to the country. its up to his highly skilled and well credentialed advisors to make sure to keep him out of those rooms.

I hope that things transition well and i hope that our country stays safe and secure, even if im cant live there for a while.

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

ishkabibble wrote:...repair the damage done to the Constitution over the past 8 years...
*chuckle*

His voting record proves otherwise.

User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

An interesting article I read today. I think the writer does a good job pointing out that although Obama may be the antithesis of GW, that may not be a good thing for Europe...
www.swissinfo.org wrote:Europe faces "disappointment" over Obama

Europe's euphoria at the election of Barack Obama as the next president of the United States may be dampened when he assumes power, a political expert warns.

Obama attracted 200,000 people to a speech in Berlin and his victory sparked the unusual spectacle of Parisians dancing in the streets. "The whole world is counting on Obama," said Swiss newspaper Blick.

Many Europeans view Obama as the antithesis of George W. Bush: liberal, tolerant and with a sympathetic international outlook.

But Professor Stephen Monsma of the Henry Institute in Michigan warns Europeans against having unrealistic expectations: Obama might be more liberal than Bush but he would continue to put Americans first when he takes office, Monsma told swissinfo.

"My impression is that many Europeans see Obama as such an internationalist that they may even doubt whether he would ever put American self-interest first," he said.

"He will be a very tough negotiator. There is so much enthusiasm for Obama in Europe, even among the French. I'm sure that America's Nato allies are soon going to feel some pressure from the Obama government to send more troops to Afghanistan and we will see how excited the French are about that."Easing unemployment pain

Monsma, a scholar in residence at Swiss bank UBS's Wolfsberg think tank, gave his views at a briefing in Thun, canton Bern, on Thursday.

He believes Obama's experience as a community worker in deprived areas of Chicago may have toughened his resolve to safeguard American jobs.

"Many of the problems people were facing were due to closures of steel mills and much of the blame was levelled at foreign competition. I am sure even today he could cite the names of people who lost their jobs as a result, allegedly, of foreign steel imports," Monsma said.

The current global economic downturn has led to huge numbers of job losses in the US. Obama hinted in his election campaign that he was prepared to act to ease the pain, according to Monsma.

"He is willing to come to the defence of the American automobile industry by putting billions of dollars of subsidy into the industry. He will be taking a close look at international treaties and asking what impact they could have on unemployment rates in the US," Monsma said.

"There may be some disappointment on the international scene as he works to protect American workers."Against torture

But Monsma predicts better news for Europe regarding Obama's foreign policy. He believes the new president will demonstrate a real understanding of America's impact on the world and will not walk away from the negotiating table as quickly as Bush.

"I expect a quick change on issues such as the use of torture against suspected terrorists, Guantanamo Bay and holding suspects indefinitely," said Monsma.

He believes however that Obama has signalled his intent to concentrate on domestic matters first and foremost before looking to the outside world.

SWITZERLAND AND OBAMA

President-elect Barack Obama and two other senators are behind a draft law called the "Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act", a 68-page document that blacklists Switzerland and more than 30 other countries as "probable tax evasion locations". The plans foresee widening the powers of the US economic and finance ministries as well as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to investigate and punish tax evasion from countries the US considers tax havens. One of the sanctions in the text would prohibit all foreign banks involved in tax evasion from introducing credit cards on the US market.

STEPHEN MONSMA

Stephen Monsma has a Masters from Georgetown University and a PhD from Michigan State University, both in political science. He taught at Calvin College, Michigan, from 1967 to 1972. He served as a Democrat in the Michigan state House of Representatives and then Senate from 1972 to 1982. He continued working in public service in Michigan until returning to academia in 1987 after failing to win election to the US national Senate. He is currently a research fellow at the Henry Institute for the study of Christianity and politics in Michigan. He is also a scholar in residence at the UBS Wolfsberg think tank.


Return to “Politics Etc.”