not that im agreeing with it, but dont you think after the ridiculous outcome of the 2000 elections, they had a right to be upset? this time around, when the AMERICAN people decided, not the stacked supreme court, the outcome is a little more clear. How would it look like if McCain went state to state demanding recounts? Childish, given the margins he lost by...Jesda wrote:Not really. I'm sure he's a nice guy.
But I'm noticing a huge difference in tone from when Bush won in 2000 and 2004. Liberals were quick to call Bush everything from Adolf Hitler to Herbert Hoover, and marched in the streets for years burning effigies of the elected president, unsubtly comparing him to vaginal pubic hair and screaming like angry children.
I've noticed many Republicans have been very respectful to President Obama, accepting him with some warmth and a semblance of hope.
Remember when Clinton left office and his staff vandalized the white house? I have a feeling Bush's people will have a bit more respect for the building, the office, and the need for some decency and respect. Its been eight years of screaming, kicking, and immature yelling on behalf of the left, and I'm glad to see that finally end.
Less Pelosi. More Obama. Please.
No. I voted for Harry Browne. I wasn't running around calling my new president 'Hitler' just because I didn't pick him.heliochrome85 wrote:not that im agreeing with it, but dont you think after the ridiculous outcome of the 2000 elections, they had a right to be upset?
I seem to remember when the 2000 election was certified and GW Bush went to work there was definitely a feeling of bi partisanship in the White House. He reached across the aisles to work with Congressional Democrats (on things like No Child Left Behind). Pretty much, especially after 911, this went on until 2003. The events leading up to the invasion of Iraq and the failure to find WMDs, set off events that have resulted in GW Bush being blamed for Katrina (apparently Bush hates blacks), Global Warming, a conspiracy to overtake the country and remain in power after his term is over, the rise in gas prices, the Sub prime Mortgage Scandal, the Liquidity Crisis and of course him just being the Devil (wonder if Bobby Boucher's mom warned him of Bush.)heliochrome85 wrote:
not that im agreeing with it, but dont you think after the ridiculous outcome of the 2000 elections, they had a right to be upset? this time around, when the AMERICAN people decided, not the stacked supreme court, the outcome is a little more clear. How would it look like if McCain went state to state demanding recounts? Childish, given the margins he lost by...
Of all the moronic stupid and flat out incorrect things you said in your pointless and false rant. that is by far the stupidest.Jesda wrote:I've noticed many Republicans have been very respectful to President Obama, accepting him with some warmth and a semblance of hope.
There were a litany or rediculous thing heaped on the GOP candidate by Obamalamians so let's not feign outrage.Jesda wrote:I've noticed many Republicans have been very respectful to President Obama, accepting him with some warmth and a semblance of hope.
You make a jackass out of yourself really well. Keep your personal comments off the board and you might do a little better. Also, read, as TMS implyed.skylndrftr wrote:
Of all the moronic stupid and flat out incorrect things you said in your pointless and false rant. that is by far the stupidest.
Did you NOT see/hear all the people yelling terrorlst at another political candidate because they disagree with him.
Your brilliant post speaks for itself.skylndrftr wrote:that is by far the stupidest.
Can I borrow your crystal ball? Because I sure can't tell people's political affiliation as they are screaming obscenities.skylndrftr wrote:
Of all the moronic stupid and flat out incorrect things you said in your pointless and false rant. that is by far the stupidest.
Did you NOT see/hear all the people yelling terrorlst at another political candidate because they disagree with him.
Failing would certinaly kinda suck, now wouldn't it? Or maybe like a 50/50 win/fail ratio...Jesda wrote:Karl Rove: "I want our new president to succeed."
Much as I may respect Bill Clinton himself, many of his staffers were absolutely obnoxious. There's a great book written by one of the FBI agents assigned to the White House at the time wherein he details their many offenses. Some real losers in that bunch.Jesda wrote:Not really. I'm sure he's a nice guy.
But I'm noticing a huge difference in tone from when Bush won in 2000 and 2004. Liberals were quick to call Bush everything from Adolf Hitler to Herbert Hoover, and marched in the streets for years burning effigies of the elected president, unsubtly comparing him to vaginal pubic hair and screaming like angry children.
I've noticed many Republicans have been very respectful to President Obama, accepting him with some warmth and a semblance of hope.
Remember when Clinton left office and his staff vandalized the white house? I have a feeling Bush's people will have a bit more respect for the building, the office, and the need for some decency and respect. Its been eight years of screaming, kicking, and immature yelling on behalf of the left, and I'm glad to see that finally end.
Less Pelosi. More Obama. Please.
If I remember correctly, the Clinton staff:1. Removed all the 'W' keys from the keyboards in the White House. Great use of American Taxpayer dollars to have to replace all the keyboards.2. They trashed certain offices in the White House.3. Left defecation in the toilettes for the incoming staff.4. Glued items to desks.5. Treated the incoming Bush staff very badly.LongBeachCoupe wrote:I also never knew that Clintons people trashed the white house though... so i may not be the most informed...
The people had decided. Al Gore was the one who took the election results and dragged them to the courts.heliochrome85 wrote:
not that im agreeing with it, but dont you think after the ridiculous outcome of the 2000 elections, they had a right to be upset? this time around, when the AMERICAN people decided, not the stacked supreme court, the outcome is a little more clear. How would it look like if McCain went state to state demanding recounts? Childish, given the margins he lost by...