Michael Medved wrote:The Democratic Party crisis over 366 disputed delegates from Florida and Michigan provides a powerful argument for keeping this bickering, disorganized party out of the White House.
The Obama campaign wants to keep the dubious Dem delegates elected in the two states from participating in the national convention, because the party announced in advance that they wouldn’t be recognized. The Clinton campaign, which won most of these delegates, wants them all seated, arguing that nearly two million voters cast Democratic ballots in the two states, and blocking the delegates would make those votes meaningless. “Howlin’ Howie” Dean, Democratic national chair, wants a revote in the two states but won’t let the national party pay for it, since that national party (namely, Chairman Dean himself) warned Florida and Michigan that if they cut-in-line on the primary calendar, they’d be punished. Obviously, Republicans in both states don’t want to use taxpayer money to pay for a second Democratic primary necessitated solely by that party’s divisions and incompetence.
Lost in all the arguments is the fact that Republicans faced a similar dilemma, but handled it much, much better. The national party also sought to penalize Michigan and Florida for breaking rules by moving their primaries ahead of schedule, and the GOP therefore decided that both states would lose half the delegates to which they were otherwise entitled, but allowed the primaries to go forward with the lessened impact of shrunken delegations. Romney won Michigan, then McCain won Florida – and with it the nomination. In any event, a reasonable compromise avoided the idiotic and embarrassing train-wreck faced by the other party.
Given the Democrats’ shocking inability to straighten out their own nomination process (unlike the GOP, which features no “super delegates” at all, they’re highly dependent on these undemocratically chosen insiders ), anyone concerned with efficiency, competence, organizational ability, should shun both the Democratic candidates and especially reject their useless and bumbling national chairman.
Doesn’t it undermine Obama’s promise to bring Americans together in a festival of kum-ba-ya unity, to see him utterly unable to unify even his own party on the relatively simple issue of primary and nomination procedures?
If this is the way they handle the selection of a nominee, just imagine how they’d organize health care, social security reform, the war on terror, tax simplification, repairing infrastructure or other challenges facing the nation at large.
The American people are watching the laughable spectacle of the ego-driven battle royal within the Democratic Party— confirming the image of clumsiness and fumbling already well-established by the perpetually confused Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. One can only hope that the silly struggle to solve the twin problems of the Wolverine and Sunshine states will convince wavering voters to turn away from the party with the chaotic, slapstick propensities of the Keystone Kops, but none of the good humor and charm.
I've got to ask. How does one know a woman "Biblically?" I understand carnally knowing one, so naturally I'm curious about the other options.W661335PF wrote:Come to Brazil where we neighbor the ever infamous, mild mannered, polite and well spoken Hugo Chavez. We have 4 political parties and a few smaller ones, voting is compulsory for those >18 yrs, and our government has its' own checks and balances system not unlike the US. Our legal system is based on a Roman and Germanic models. Anyway, we have the most beautiful women in the world, and if you've never known one Biblically, you've not lived fully... wait a minute, that wasn't the issue here, sorry, I digressed.
rn79870 wrote:
I've got to ask. How does one know a woman "Biblically?" I understand carnally knowing one, so naturally I'm curious about the other options.
I would much rather have my ignorance than your knowledge!Rick Damone Jr wrote:A vote for obama is a vote for osama, seriously. We dont need a racist democrat muslim as president, especially now when islam is at war with the west.
Break out the first-aid kit, kids!!!rn79870 wrote:Can you give me one example of Obama being a racist? I've missed any evidence of that.
You are right, Obama attends Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. Now his minister (Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr) is a piece of work and has been linked with Louis Farrakhan. Hannity was playing long clips of Rev. Wright and I have to say that he goes beyond being a racist, bordering on Anti Semitism and anti American.rn79870 wrote:Wow, Obama has said he isn't a Muslim. Islam isn't at war with the west, unless I've missed some breaking news. Can you give me one example of Obama being a racist? I've missed any evidence of that. Regardless of how I vote, I have the highest respect for the man and what he has accomplished in his life. I think he would probably score higher on an IQ test than any of the other candidates too.
Greg,Obama is a Columbia and Harvard graduate. He was also elected to the Illinois State Legislature and the Senate. Those are accomplishments. Now what has he accomplished while in the Senate.. I would ask people to name specific accomplishments that he has done while in the Senate.AZhitman wrote:
Such as?
What has he accomplished in the United States Senate?
Local and Federal governments are so different, they're almost absurd to compare.
Islam as a whole (if there is such a thing, since its not a centralized hierarchical religion) is not at war with the West. But many Islamo Facist groups inside Islam are.rn79870 wrote:Wow, Obama has said he isn't a Muslim. Islam isn't at war with the west, unless I've missed some breaking news.
Didn’t he see constitutional issues being violated there?AZhitman wrote:Break out the first-aid kit, kids!!!
-- He pushed the "racial profiling" issue by police in his last years in the Illinois State Senate
NO-NO-NO…Obama opposes the death penalty except for terrorists, serial killers and child-murderersSo is just about every advanced country in the world. Exceptions, China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, and the United States. Good company. A regular who’s who of repression there. The death penalty is pretty final, and do we want to look at what Amnesty International has discovered about errors in the death sentence cases? No you don’t.AZhitman wrote:He is anti-death penalty (His excuse is he is against the way it is conducted in the United States)
He sometimes voted for “individual rights” rather than for facilitating law enforcement. Again, falling back on that Constructional, individual rights thing. Why did we ever let them out in the first place?AZhitman wrote:-- In 1998, Obama was one of only three senators to vote against a proposal making it a criminal offense for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang.
“There’s a strong overlap between gang affiliation and young men of color … I think it’s problematic for them to be singled out as more likely to receive the death penalty for carrying out certain acts than are others who do the same thing.” Barak Obama.AZhitman wrote:In 2001, Obama voted against a measure that would have expanded the penalties for some gang activity (such as murder for gang membership or "street cred") to include the death penalty
I have not seen information on that.AZhitman wrote:In 1999, he was the only state senator to vote against a bill prohibiting early prison release for criminal sexual abusers
That’s not what he said. See above.AZhitman wrote:Obama has made claims that laws targeting gangs single out people of color (he makes no such overtures to the victims)
“There is really no proof or indication that automatic transfers and increased penalties and adult penalties for juvenile offenses have, in fact, proven to be more effective in reducing juvenile crime or cutting back on recidivism.” Perhaps he was trying to fix a broken system.AZhitman wrote:Supports alternative sentencing and rehabilitation
See above.AZhitman wrote:He opposes mandatory sentencing
Equality and justice for all. I agree, he’s on to something here.AZhitman wrote:He supports all left wing racial disparity arguments regarding law enforcement. He said ... "If I am president, I will have a civil rights division that is working with local law enforcement so that they are enforcing laws fairly and justly."
What part of the bill was he against, and why? Too narrow of a statement.AZhitman wrote:-- Obama has also been criticized for voting "present" on a measure to prohibit sex-related shops from opening near schools
What part of the bill was he against, and why? Too narrow of a statement.AZhitman wrote:-- He was the only state senator to not support a privacy bill for victims of sexual abuse
Yeah, an organization devoted to upholding the supreme law of the land. An organization that believes the constitution should be applied equally and fairly and without regard to emotion. This tells me that Obama must have a pretty high regard for the Constitution and its application to everyday situations. I kinda gotta agree with that.AZhitman wrote:-- 100 percent rating from the ACLU (THAT alone should tell you something!)
Last I heard, that bill was in front of Lugars Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and was going no where.AZhitman wrote:He's very left wing when it comes to gun control, redistribution of wealth, he's ridiculously pro-union and anti business. He has no economic policy whatsoever besides raising taxes on those who already pay the most so it can be redistributed through various forms of welfare programs. Just him pressing forth the "Global Property Act of 2007" is enough to call him a far-left socialist.
From that article…AZhitman wrote:If elected, he'd be the most liberal president this country has seen, which would be disastrous economically. He also has ties to rebel groups in Kenya who have engaged the most pro-western government in that part of Africa through violence, including blowing up a church full of Christians.
Link to article where Obama supports the Palestinians:http://www.jewishpress.com/dis...num=0
That article references Louis Farrakhan as an ally. Obama has replied to the endorsement from Farrakhan with a Thanks, but no thanks.AZhitman wrote:Link to article where Obama supports militants in Kenyahttp://biz.yahoo.com/ibd/080115/issues.html?.v=1
Well, compared to Hillary, and the Crypt keeper looking Cindy McCain, Michelle is a breath of fresh air. Besides, Michelle isn't running this year.AZhitman wrote:Don't get me started on his CLOWN of a wife:
Some Michelle Obama comments:
“Hope is making a comeback and, let me tell you, for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change,”
"You know, there's always that doubt in the back of the minds of people of color. People who've been oppressed and haven't been given real opportunities. That you never really believe. That you believe that somehow, someone is better than you. You know, deep down inside, you doubt whether you can do it, because that's all you've been told, is "no, wait." That's all you hear, and you hear it from people who love you."
Mrs. Obama implied that America’s allegedly rampant white racism posed a great physical threat to her husband, who had just announced his candidacy for the 2008 presidential race. Said Mrs. Obama: “As a black man, you know, Barack can get shot going to the gas station.” "
"The salaries don’t keep up with the cost of paying off the debt. So you’re in your forties, still paying off your debt at a time when you have to save for your kids. Barack and I were in that position. The only reason we’re not in that position is that Barack wrote two best-selling books.… It was like Jack and his magic beans. But up until a few years ago, we were struggling to figure out how we would save for our kids.” “We left corporate America,” Mrs. Obama added, “which is a lot of what we’re asking young people to do. Don’t go into corporate America. You know, become teachers. Work for the community. Be social workers. Be a nurse. Those are the careers that we need, and we’re encouraging our young people to do that. But if you make that choice, as we did, to move out of the money-making industry into the helping industry, then your salaries respond.” "
--- Realize that she and Barak made >$1.7 million during the 7 years she claims they were "struggling" which relates to $250k/yr.
"Don’t get sick in this country - not here. Americans are in debt not because they live frivolously but because someone got sick. And even with insurance, the deductibles and premiums are so high that people are still putting medication and treatments on credit cards."
From her College Thesis “Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community” :
“Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.”
“[My Princeton experiences] “will likely lead to my further integration and/or assimilation into a White cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.”
“I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don't belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second.”
“Earlier in my college career, there was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the Black community I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost.”
“In defining the concept of identification or the ability to identify with the black community … I based my definition on the premise that there is a distinctive black culture very different from white culture.”
Thanks to a few colleagues for their assistance...
There are 570 delegates left. Obama has 1614 (?)and Hillary has 1487(?). Hillary's superdelegate lead has dwindled to 36, and next week 35 due to the NY governor resigning.96Qowner wrote:I just recently realized something remarkable. Neither Obama or Clinton can get enough pledged delegates to win the nomination - there aren't enough left to get to the required 2025. That means, from now on, the super delegates are all that matter, not necessarily a good thing. They're all Party pols with political needs and in the business of making deals. They can change their minds at any time.
If the Party hadn't made all the races proportional allocations, Clinton would already have clinched the nomination, because she won the big States. It's a real mess now.
Fixed your typo.rn79870 wrote:Imagine a President that doesn't give a rat's a$$ about the constitution.
He supports it, proposed it and it's bad legislation. I don't care if it is stuck in committee or not. If he proposed it in order to get "points" while knowing it would never pass than I have issues with that as well (wasting our govt's time with BS).rn79870 wrote:Last I heard, that bill was in front of Lugars Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and was going no where.
That's kinda where I stand, but I don't know if I'd go so far as to say there's not some "change" needed.Rick Damone Jr wrote:To be honest I dont really like any of the candidates. This country would be much better off with bush as president for 4 more years..