No Heavy-Duty Titan After All....

Forum for the Xterra, Frontier and Hardbody, the smaller workhorses of the Nissan lineup!
User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

It looks like the challenges in the heavy-duty pickup truck market is too intense for Nissan, who has decided to steer clear of the potentially lucrative, yet highly-competitive, market. Heavy duty offerings from the Detroit three come in several different configurations to suit virtually every need, and Nissan seems to feel that they would have trouble selling enough HD trucks to make it worth their while. The scribes over at Pickuptruck.com quote Nissan as pointing out data that shows only one in three truck owners would consider a foreign truck. With limited sales opportunities, Nissan would have trouble matching higher-volume manufacturers on price, including domestics that will pile on incentives in order to move their bread and butter trucks.

Nissan has plenty of reasons for their decision, yet we think if the Titan had lived up to its lofty sales goals there would be an HD version on the way.


User avatar
Desert Rat
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2014 370Z M6 Base Coupe
2017 Frontier 4.0
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Quad Cab 4x4
1977 F150 4x4 Shorty BUILT
2008 Boulevard C90T
Previous owner of a bunch of Nissans
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post

Do you have a news source on this? I believe the HD was still slated as a 2009 offering when the truck gets a facelift.

OTH, the Titan has difficulty living up to its 1/2 ton competitors thanks to a weak rear axle that cannot live up to the Titan's tow rating.

User avatar
hsckris
Posts: 1623
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:02 pm
Car: 07 V8 4runner

Post

Desert Rat wrote:Titan has difficulty living up to its 1/2 ton competitors thanks to a weak rear axle that cannot live up to the Titan's tow rating.
yeah and now it is barely competing with the newly released silverado and tundra on the capabilities front.

honestly, i've driven the titan and a new-style tundra, and the tundra was better all around (even though it had the 4.7; though the titan did feel more powerful than the 4.7)

User avatar
Desert Rat
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2014 370Z M6 Base Coupe
2017 Frontier 4.0
2007 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins Quad Cab 4x4
1977 F150 4x4 Shorty BUILT
2008 Boulevard C90T
Previous owner of a bunch of Nissans
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Post

I admit, I haven't driven the Tundra, but I have driven 2wd and 4wd versions of the Titan and I love how the truck drives, and I like the interior layout. If it had a Dana 60 rear, it'd be a heckuva contender.

Those new Tundras, despite the big motor and new everything look like complete a$$.

User avatar
Big-Bird
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:41 pm
Car: 2000 Xterra on 'Roids & 2004 Quest SL

Post

Big trucks for even bigger bucks

I have a Toyota and Nissan dealer that are across the street from one another. I'll admit I did drool a bit over the Toy, but that price tag scared me off.

High $40G's (canadian) for a Tundra 4x4....

I would rather have a 4x4 Titan. It just looks more serious IMHO.

User avatar
Dano
Posts: 11535
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:01 pm
Car: '05 Nissan Frontier Nismo CC
'95 Nissan 240SX base
Location: Kansas City, KS/ Phx, AZ
Contact:

Post

This really makes me sad

BOOOOOOOOOO NISSAN! ... BOO!

-Dan


Return to “Nissan Trucks Forum”