I love this series of articles. Worth discussing in this one:
Many features in Teana’s interior create an airy feeling of the interior such as its panel design. For example, its designers decided to let pads "float" above the wood-grain of the instrument panel and doors which makes the whole interior feel very light and spacious.
I don't know about other Niconauts, but they've just described the least appealing interior imaginable to me. "Airy" is the opposite of how I want my interior to feel. And "floating" pieces only serve to kill ergonomics.
Look at the Z32 or MKIV Supra, two of the best interior designs in history. Nothing in there would be described as airy or floaty.
No one is doing interiors right these days, but Nissan seems to be chasing BMW, who is doing them wrongest of all. Dash designs that intentionally curve AWAY from the occupants, rather than curving AROUND them. I'd argue that "airy" is the wrong word. The correct descriptor is "distant" or perhaps "detached."
The interior of a car is the interface by which occupants interact with it. One can choose to make it feel apart from the occupants, or make it feel at one with the occupants. The former is wrong. The latter is desirable. Even if you're talking about a roomy limousine, you never want the interior to be a thing "over there." It should be a PART of the experience of the car. There's a difference between roomy and distant. G50 Q45 is the perfect example. Very roomy car, also a very intimate interior. It envelops the occupants, it doesn't stand apart from them as some kind of out-of-place modern art.