Post by
MinisterofDOOM »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/ministerofdoom-u16506.html
Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:13 am
Where did you get that from? First off, that toyota engine has had some reliability problems of its own. Go read up on it. It'll make you wonder what the hell Lotus was thinking--just like I do. Second, you make Lotus sound like their cars are all notorious for being horribly unreliable. While they may not be the most reliable auto-maker in the world, they are far from the bottom. Besides, who cares if they aren't exactly well known for making reliable cars? At least those cars are more fun to drive while they are running. I'd gladly sacrifice some reliability for that additional fun-to-drive-factor (which is far more than any of you who are arguing against me will admit)--fun to drive is what makes a Lotus a Lotus!! What is the point of one if it isn't all it can be in that department.
You can argue in favor of the engine or against Lotus all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the Lotus Elise that we can buy here in America is not even close to the car it could have been, or the car that its European counterpart is.
"The Toyota engine was only used to pass U.S. emissions" is only half the story. The other half is that it would have taken two years to get the Lotus engine legalized for American use. They could have done it but they didn't because they had promised a deadline. So instead they found a small, high revving four cylindar and messed with the tuning a bit. It was a stupid mistake that cost the car in performance, and it made Lotus look like fools.
Put it this way, what if they finally brought the Skyline GT-R over here, but since they didn't want to have to deal with emissions problems, they just put a VTEC Honda V6 in it...its the same thing here.
Modified by MinisterofDOOM at 5:26 AM 11/1/2004