Post by
Encryptshun »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/encryptshun-u67236.html
Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:27 pm
Sure I agree with you in principal, Greg, but my big problem with the whole "keep it like it is, don't change unless we have to" platform is that it's not sustainable in the long-term. It's a delay tactic at best, and detrimental to progress at worst. Back in the 19th (and 20th) century when factories were belching out soot, hazardous chemicals, and toxic sludge right into the bodies of their workers, no one wanted to do anything because it costs more to change to something better than to keep things like they are. If what you care about is eliminating costs and maximizing profits, then doing nothing is the right answer. (No one was going to stop buying steel from the mills in Pittsburg just because their workers were dying of cancer and emphysema at the age of 35.) If you care about the sustainability of your industry long-term, you gotta take a step or two back in order to find the trail again. Same with current automotive technology. I'm as in love with the automobile as anybody on this forum. I drive a gas-guzzling SUV and I love every second of it. I don't complain about the fact it costs me $100 a week to fill up the tank because that's the tradeoff I elected to make.
Bottom line is that using our current (read: antiquated) power production methods and infrastructure, as well as our current (read: antiquatd) recycling and consumer-good production methods, creating new products like an electric car is absolutely upside-down from a carbon footprint perspective. (And of course, the entire argument is invalid to a MMGW-denier in the first place:) ) But, things aren't going to be this way forever. And we have to make some investments in cultural change and economic incentive to getting this huge overbloated lard-arse petrolium-addict of a country to look up and see the opportunity.
Sorry, I have a little vinegar in my piss this afternoon.