Nissan Juke headed to showrooms in October

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54548
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Nissan has released another picture of the latest addition to its line up of crossovers. It's clearly inspired by the Qazana concept, but appears to be too small to be based on the Qashqai platform.

The 370Z-inspired rear boomerang lights are represented as on almost all new Nissan designs. This one should fit into the lineup between the Nissan Note and the Nissan Qashqai, and will expand Nissan's broad range even further.

It will be built alongside the Qashqai and Qashqai+2 at Nissan's Sunderland plant in the UK, and looks like it might not make it to the US. We'll have more details after the global media unveiling on February 10th, and it'll be revealed to the general public at the Geneva Motor Show in March.

Thanks to AutoExpress for the great pics!





User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

The only thing I don't really like is the lights way up on the tops of the fenders. Aside from that it manages to be different and interesting without being ugly. I actually think the round headlights go really well with the Nissan corporate grille.

User avatar
Infinitiguy19
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:58 pm
Car: 1993 Infiniti Q45 188580 Miles
1994 Infiniti Q45a 240000 Miles

Post

Ugly as sin, Wheels look nice though.

Papi Chulo
Posts: 2395
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:51 am
Car: 72' Datsun 510

Post

So that's what AIDS looks like

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Umm...

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19013
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Yeah, I'm all set with that.

Is there some kind of rule that all new cars/SUVs must look like rolling turds?

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Not liking this

User avatar
downedzephyr
Posts: 1953
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Car: 09 Altima Coupe 3.5se
Location: San Jose, CA

Post

it's alright until you see it from the front. those headlights and whatever the hell that splitter s*** is on front is atrocious.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19013
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

nissangirl74 wrote:Not liking this
I just took a second look and thought "Damn, the photographer really tried... he really did all he could to make that thing look good".

User avatar
raremotive
Posts: 3581
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:54 pm
Car: 04 Infiniti G35
Location: Stuck in the middle.

Post

And juke just happens to rhythm with puke.

User avatar
MellowZ32
Posts: 27320
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:29 pm
Car: Pornographer's car
Location: Parts Unknown

Post


User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

Wow, I heard rumors that Nissan was trying to make something that looks worse than the Cube...

SUCCESS!

naladude911
Posts: 4818
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:28 am
Car: 2001 Infiniti QX4
Location: Mount Kisco, New York

Post

I like it, it kinda looks like the buggy from GTA. To me, it looks like something you would find on the beaches of Cali lol.

User avatar
lino
Posts: 3533
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:48 am
Car: 1991 Q45a Fed-Spec, IQP/White, Texasoil 9 Accumulator Recharge, '93 TCU 1st Gear Start, JWFSB, B&M 70268 Transmission Cooler, BBS Forged Wheels, DRLs, Silverstars, Tint, Very Well Serviced.
Contact:

Post

I don't know why you guys hate it that much. Nissan has made many cars that were much worse.

http://fuglymobile.blogspot.co....html

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 6928
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

I think we'll see a more attractive final model.

First off, I don't think the headlight setup conforms to US safety regs. I think you have to have turn indicators down on the bumper area, which means split headlight design with the high beams atop the fenders won't work in a production model. I also don't think the front bumper will go into production like that.. just a guess.

I think it would look a million times better if the wheel arches weren't quite so high, the front bumper didn't come up front under the car so high, and the headlights being split on top of the fenders... strange!


User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

MellowS13 wrote:
^^This

Do we really need more of these things? I want big square vans, kei cars, and low-slung wagons. American focus groups are the root of all evil.

User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post

lino wrote:I don't know why you guys hate it that much. Nissan has made many cars that were much worse.
early 240z concept [could've] been one of them



..well imo.

And about the juke, I think it looks good minus the headlights and rocket pods on the bumper.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Dasoupdude wrote:
early 240z concept [could've] been one of them



..well imo.

And about the juke, I think it looks good minus the headlights and rocket pods on the bumper.
That thing was ka powered. Wouldn't that have gone over great?!

User avatar
sil80_chris
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:03 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240sx

Post

Rare_f8 wrote:And juke just happens to rhyme with puke.
Fixed. I like the juke. That is all...

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

Eikon wrote:I think we'll see a more attractive final model.

First off, I don't think the headlight setup conforms to US safety regs. I think you have to have turn indicators down on the bumper area, which means split headlight design with the high beams atop the fenders won't work in a production model.
The new Ford F-series Super duty trucks all have the headlight below the turn signals/running lights, and it bugs the ever-loving s*** out of me.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Ace2cool wrote:
The new Ford F-series Super duty trucks all have the headlight below the turn signals/running lights, and it bugs the ever-loving s*** out of me.
NO. You are not allowed to complain about that.* It is a GOOD thing. Trucks are tall. And people often lift them and make them taller. What that means for people in normal cars is that we get headlights shining right at our faces. Ford has moved the headlights as low as possible on the new SD F series. This means there are fewer SD fords out there blinding everyone else on the road.

*

seang
Posts: 2026
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:09 pm
Car: Ford Fiesta ST
Location: Michigan

Post

I don't care what it can transform into, the hardbody KILLS it. See my avatar

Bring back real mini-trucks PLEASE.

User avatar
_b.jaye_
Posts: 387
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:13 pm
Car: '03 350Z

Post




User avatar
HardDrifts4Lace
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 11:28 am
Car: ehhh about that.

Post

Dear, Nissan


User avatar
bobotech
Posts: 4886
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:26 pm

Post

Don't like.

User avatar
Xdisaster240sX
Posts: 3989
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:57 pm
Car: S13 Hatch, R32 GTS4
Location: Baltimore

Post

IT reminds me of that Toyota thing.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

WHAT Toyota thing?

User avatar
raremotive
Posts: 3581
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:54 pm
Car: 04 Infiniti G35
Location: Stuck in the middle.

Post


User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

That big square thing looks like that little round thing? I doubt that's what he meant. If it is, he needs new glasses.

User avatar
BusyBadger
Posts: 3753
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 3:20 pm
Car: '92 Nissan 240SX
'05 Nissan 350Z
'13 Nissan Juke
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:The only thing I don't really like is the lights way up on the tops of the fenders.
I'm right there with you on that, outside of those I really like it.

All of you "hate it" & "kill it with fire types" need to come up with some of your own designs, Spidey-sense tells me we'll get something like this...



Return to “General Chat”