I lol'ed. I think it will.alphapig wrote:The pants-on-head retarded concept car styling should disappear.
52 wires coming out of the ECU. All of them black. No diagram. Have fun.Hijacker wrote:Give me a few more years to finish up me EE. It's all just signals and electrons. Depending on if the CVT's computer is integrated with the ECM or if they just talk over the CAN will set the tone and pace.
Psh. Meters and scopes my friend. Meters and scopes. Never said it would be easy. It should be doable with enough time, patience, and equipment.AZhitman wrote:52 wires coming out of the ECU. All of them black. No diagram. Have fun.Hijacker wrote:Give me a few more years to finish up me EE. It's all just signals and electrons. Depending on if the CVT's computer is integrated with the ECM or if they just talk over the CAN will set the tone and pace.


ImStricken wrote:
The "Design Director" in this video says.... and i quote:krash wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Soi_MI-jP7s[/youtube]



AZhitman wrote:What if it had the Rocket Bunny treatment?

I don't care if the thing launches with a Mr. Fusion and a Flux Capacitor- if it doesn't have a manual transmission, I'm not even test driving it.AZhitman wrote:What if it had the Rocket Bunny treatment?
Not everyone lives in the land of milk and honey, Bex!! The rest of the world deals with rust!nissangirl74 wrote:If I wanted to buy a car that looked like a 510, guess what? I'D BUY A %&*%^&*%^&* 510!!![]()
I can tell you why the IDX concept is only CVT, but I can't explain why they would say that it will only be CVT.dgms240 wrote:If they can put a 240hp version of the 1.6 turbo Juke motor and 6spd manual in the Sentra NISMO, why the hell can't they put the same thing in this only RWD?!!!
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/11/20/niss ... t-la-2013/
Yea I agree that it makes complete sense for a concept, I was talking more about a production version. Any production version of this car SHOULD AT LEAST OFFER a manual transmission.EZcheese15 wrote:I can tell you why the IDX concept is only CVT, but I can't explain why they would say that it will only be CVT.dgms240 wrote:If they can put a 240hp version of the 1.6 turbo Juke motor and 6spd manual in the Sentra NISMO, why the hell can't they put the same thing in this only RWD?!!!
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/11/20/niss ... t-la-2013/
The reason the concept is CVT is simple. Nissan plans to sell more of the base IDX's than the Nismo versions, which means more CVT's than they could with a manual. This is just common marketing sense.
When building 2 concept vehicles, they are only going to build one drivetrain set because they are showing off the way the car looks, not it's power plant and drivetrain. There's no sense in building a concept car with a one-off RWD 6 spd transmission, when they can easily throw in the CVT they already developed for the other concept car (the Freeflow).
The Sentra is a different story. Because it's FWD, and there is already a FWD manual transmission for the MR motor in production (in the Juke). They didn't have to do any new transmission development.
Like I said, that explains why the concepts were built they way they were. However, all Nissan would have to do is say that a production version would offer a manual (or better yet, manual only in the Nismo version), and it would calm down the whole Internet. But they won't, because they love their CVT's for some god awful reason.
Another example of what I'm talking about.themadscientist wrote:So, friends, I wonder when we stopped being customers of Nissan to be won over and became Nissan's battered girlfriends. "give them more time," and "we could swap the engine and/or transmission" after buying a brand new car? That sounds suspiciously like a girl dating an a-hole saying "I can change him" and "it's my fault." WTF?
Translation: I know he can't dress and is kind of a jerk, BUT I CAN CHANGE HIM!dgms240 wrote:Also, for those who don't care for the looks, body panels, etc. I read somewhere that the body panels and headlights might be interchangeable to allow different looks. If that's true it should make it a lot easier to customize, think being able to swap rear fender/quarter panels without cutting etc.!
Mate replued that it was a goof up on his part :/. I'm glad he put that jab in there. The more people who try to beat it through Nissan's thick head that the CVT is not the answer, the better.dgms240 wrote:The article must have been changed, cuz this is what i read when i clicked the link: "With side mufflers, a 1.6 turbo engine linked to a sportier CVT and 225/40 19-inch tires, this feels more like our game, except it would be even better with a proper manual"