I'd like to know what caused them this sudden change of heart. They go from claiming "everything is normal, nothing to see here" to doubling the warranty length.kerrton wrote:It's absolutely true, here's the official site with all the information you need. Congratulations, you've all got a 10 year warranty, way to go Nissan! And, any CVT replacements that were paid out of pocket will now be reimbursed 100%!
http://www.nissanassist.com/index.php?menu=1
That's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is that Nissan can't afford lost sales due to questions about CVT reliability, so they offer a warranty to make prospective buyers more comfortable (and then deny the warranty claims 5 years later when something goes wrong).kerrton wrote:I think you got it backwards, by extending the warranty to 10 years, they're saying "everything is normal/great, the CVT is extremely reliable and to prove it we'll give it the best warranty in the business, we're that confident that it is a reliable trouble free component and will be so over the long term."
This proves the CVT is reliable, not that it has problems. If it was problematic they wouldn't be able to afford to give this warranty to millions of vehicles.
That's a pretty bold statement unless you have access to the Nissan's warranty repair records. Do you know what the rate and mode of CVT failure/replacement is? Unless you do, you can't really say with any certainty what's motivating the new warranty.kerrton wrote:No question about it, it's definately a desperate attempt at damage control by addressing perceptions about the reliability of the CVT, it's not about addressing real issues but rather perceptions.
http://en.wakopedia.org/wiki/Continuous ... ansmissionkerrton wrote:No question about it, it's definately a desperate attempt at damage control by addressing perceptions about the reliability of the CVT, it's not about addressing real issues but rather perceptions.
For example, if a Ford transmission dies after a couple years, they rebuild it on warranty and people talk, chaulk it up to "bad luck" or something like that, and continue on their way. If a CVT fails under similar circumstances, people say "the CVT is a bad design, Nissan made a mistake, and I won't buy another CVT vehicle ever because the technology is crap". But the Ford guy with transmission trouble would never say "I'll never buy another conventional transmission, because the design is crap, and I have proof - my transmission died after two years so I'm going to spread the word that conventional transmission's are to be avoided".
So the CVT is not given a fair chance because it's a newer technology, but I think from the rough data I've looked at, Jatco CVT's have better reliability than Ford and Chrysler conventional transmission's, each dealer has at least one full time transmission guy who does nothing but work on convetional transmission's, which means that they have lots of troubles, it's just a fact of life.
Micron wrote: CVTs are hardly "new" technology... Their implementation in passenger vehicles is the only new idea.
Micron wrote:
That's kind of like saying that universal health care isn't a new idea..it's just a new implementation in the United States - point is that large-run manufacturing is a completely different from putting a drawing to paper.
If nissan gets this right in passenger cars cross its whole line, it'll be the first car manufacturer to do so.
Sound Clip of dying CVTheysteve wrote:that is really good news. here is a very interesting article on how the cvt pairs up against normal transmissions. makes me proud to be a cvt owner http://auto.howstuffworks.com/cvt5.htm
That's the thing - it wasn't a normal tech...it was one of those DTS "super techs" whose only job is to troubleshoot serious problems. He heard the noise, then called out another field tech. The second tech heard the noise on the road, but when we listened to the noise on a lift he said "no abnormal sounds." The suspicious thing is that he brake-torqued the transmission 3 times right before putting the car on the lift: I think he was trying to heat up the transmission and make the noise go away temporarily. (I noticed and stupidly told him that the noise is softer after you've been driving for a while.)kerrton wrote:Nobody expects you to live with a noisy, dying transmission, this isn't an issue with Nissan but rather an issue with a bad technician who is too dumb to recognize an obvious problem. If you brought your car to my service department they wouldn't need to leave the parking lot to id the problem and they'd have a new CVT ordered for you 10 minutes later.