Post by
nametakennow »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/nametakennow-u713.html
Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:01 am
If it was "too lean" at low RPM the car could sputter and, in extreme cases, might even stall.
At low RPM and low throttle, A/F ratio can be quite lean, depending on the engine and what mods it has on it. From the factory most cars are tuned to be this way to reduce fuel consumption.
At high RPM and high throttle manufacturers build in a fairly large "safe zone" of richness to avoid any detonation.
What people don't get is that a comparably (to stock at high throttle) "lean" mixture is a good thing in terms of power AND fuel efficiency because it leads to more complete combustion in the chamber. A mixture that's too rich means that you waste fuel and make less power, too lean you get detonation and destroy your engine. Manufacturers put in the safe zone to provide for the longevity of the vehicle, which in their business makes sense.
That said, an SAFC tune would pull a few more ponies out of the engine by allowing you to lean out the upper RPM fuel mixture, just avoid detonation. My guess is 5-10whp or so, I know someone's tested this and I don't remember their results off the top of my head. However, tuning doesn't provide the same benefits across the board. Engines with few or no mods will only see a couple hp with tuning. This has to do with the mods themselves changing the ECU's adjustments to the data from the sensors.
In basic terms - When you tune, you undo some of the adjusting the ECU has made for change in intake/fuel characteristics and take advantage of more of what the mods do. This is especially true of more involved mods like cams. Even I/H/E isn't cause for dropping $200+ on an SAFC, as the gains from it aren't much because the mods have changed very little about how efficient the engine can be.