Jesda wrote:Googling for pictures of Kelly Lebrock.
I was at work polishing a chair with my butt. . That's amazing how big NICO's gotten...
Jesda wrote:Googling for pictures of Kelly Lebrock.
audtatious wrote:Dunno, what do you want?
Thats such a grate vid.gabossie wrote:Watching Raven Riley get.... nevermind
Yeah. Heck, the advertiser information said >40k a few weeks agao. Looks like it is a monthly requirement to keep up with our growthMr1der wrote:tell Greg to update his damn sig!
Mhm.gabossie wrote:Watching Raven Riley get.... nevermind
I gotta hear the whole story behind this.Oatmealman wrote:i was breaking some kids wrist because he talking ****,and now i'm suspended.
We have a dedicated server just for the database of the forums. The database is not what makes the site slow (if you can even call it slow). The slow point of the site is mostly on the user's side downloading the graphics.bobotech wrote:Isn't it about time the database get purged of all the non-posters or one-time and long since posted members (up to say maybe no more than 3 posts)?
The database is probably suffering because of the numbers.
It would make sense to wipe out everyone who has never posted and who signed up 6 months or longer ago. And then wipe out everyone who posted maybe up to 3 posts and then hasn't posted in the last year.
You could probably weed out a ton of dead weight that is doing nothing but clogging up the database. Might make performance of the forum better and make user based searches work better too.
I don't mean that the site is slow but all that dead weight is going to effect response somewhere. Its just dead weight, why keep it around?EZcheese15 wrote:
We have a dedicated server just for the database of the forums. The database is not what makes the site slow (if you can even call it slow). The slow point of the site is mostly on the user's side downloading the graphics.
Same here!! JK. She's freakin hot though.gabossie wrote:Watching Raven Riley get.... nevermind
I agree. If a user hasn't posted in over a year, he probably won't remember his password let alone his username. Plus, it's just better having a clean database and doesn't make Nico seem so over inflated with non-posters.bobotech wrote:I don't mean that the site is slow but all that dead weight is going to effect response somewhere. Its just dead weight, why keep it around?
And on top of that, it would help for the user who logs on 2 years ago, makes 1 posts, never returns but then decides to come back in 2 weeks but has no idea what his password was. If the account was purged, he can just sign back up with all new settings and email info.
Most companies purge their databases of old unneeded data over time.
'topless94 wrote:
I gotta hear the whole story behind this.
I got one of those today @ 3 to see if I have a slipped disk pinching some nerves.OriginalWheelman wrote:Getting an MRI to see if I need neck surgery.