Newbie question, did my search on here. nothing yet. Tires/wheels

Shocks, springs, sway bars, coliovers, bushings, brakes, wheels, tires - This is the place to discuss G-Series suspension modifications!
User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

Whats up everyone? I have a question. I have a 2004 G35 sedan with stock 17's on it. Im upgrading my wheels to the 2008 G35 sedan wheels. The new wheels are 18x7.5 (front) 18x8.5(rear) staggard. It says that the stock sizes for that are 225/50/18 front and 245/45/18 rear. Well with that said the Kumho Ecsta SPT's i want to run they dont carry both sizes. They do have the 225/45/18 for the front and the 245/40/18 for the rear. How much difference in fender gap would it be if i ran the original size compared to the Kumhos i want? Is there a big difference between seeing a 50 series compared to a 45 series on a car? Any bit of info will help. Thanks!


User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

I'd like to dispell the idea of sidewall "series" because it makes absolutely no sense when we're talking about fender gap.

The "series" (which isn't the wrong term, just a very vague one) refers to the aspect ratio of the tire. Meaning it's the sidewall height as a percentage of the width of the tire.

If you go 5% smaller in the front and rear, you'll be losing approximately 1/2" on both the front and rear which equates to almost 1" in total diameter.

Your speedometer will also be off by a ratio of 1:20MPH.

See my sig if you're interested, PM me. I can sell two instead of all 4.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

Thanks for that info, but will the difference in those tire sidewall aspect sizes make a noticeable difference? I want to run the Kumho SPT's because they are a good cheap tire, im just wondering if a 45 ratio in the front and a 40 ratio in the back will look funny, and no i dont plan on lowering it. LOL

User avatar
Beancooker
Posts: 12129
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:45 pm
Car: Current Car: 2019 Toyota Tacoma (modded)
Past cars: Way too many to list
Location: Cottonwood, AZ.

Post

Sentientbydesign wrote:
PM me.
Expain to me how this works... Am I missing something?

User avatar
Beancooker
Posts: 12129
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:45 pm
Car: Current Car: 2019 Toyota Tacoma (modded)
Past cars: Way too many to list
Location: Cottonwood, AZ.

Post

dolamite wrote:Thanks for that info, but will the difference in those tire sidewall aspect sizes make a noticeable difference? I want to run the Kumho SPT's because they are a good cheap tire, im just wondering if a 45 ratio in the front and a 40 ratio in the back will look funny, and no i dont plan on lowering it. LOL
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

Try using that. It should make visual sense.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

I personally wouldn't do it. I think the gap is big enough.

I originally was going to go with those tires, but I decided to get some used ones instead.
Beanor wrote:
Expain to me how this works... Am I missing something?
Tengo llanta en ventar. Oh wait, wrong beans. I have 4 225/50/18s for sale.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

Tirerack has the "original" sizes for the rims im getting, but they only have the Eagle F1's at a decent price. The kumhos were waaaaaay cheaper, but i would have to sacrifice tire height. The guy at the local tire shop told me if i ran 225/45/18 front and 225/40/18 rear, instead of 225/50/18 front and 225/45/18 rear, that it would only be a 3/4" in height difference. He said you probably wouldnt even notice.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

It's .8" in the front and a little over an inch in the rear.

Your tires will break loose slight easier, you'll get more fender gap, and for every 20 MPH, you'll be going 19 MPH. Your fuel economy might go up, or it might go down, that depends on whether the energy saved from smaller tires is higher than the extra energy exterted in moving the drive train faster.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

so it seems i should invest in the Eagle F1's and get the "original" size, that way i wont have fender gap running a lower profile. I figured if i was moving up an inch in rim diameter, that i can sacrifice tire height and not have gap issues.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

Im still curious to see how the 2008 g35 wheels will look on my 2004 sedan. They are the 7 star split spoke wheels.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

oh yeah, and it also sucks that they will be staggerd wheels. no tire rotations. That bites. Oh well, thats the price you pay for the sport look.


User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post



I don't think you quite get the concept. Just because you're adding an inch to the size of the rims doesn't mean anything is happening to the Overall Diameter of the tire.

If you look, the aspect ratio for each sucessive rim size will get smaller. In other words, the sidewall gets smaller every time the rims gets bigger so that the Overall Diameter stays the same.

So get the Eagle F1s, or buy 2 of the Bridgestones from me and get the other two from Tirerack.

User avatar
Beancooker
Posts: 12129
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:45 pm
Car: Current Car: 2019 Toyota Tacoma (modded)
Past cars: Way too many to list
Location: Cottonwood, AZ.

Post

Sentientbydesign wrote: I have 4 225/50/18s for sale.
I see that.

How does one "PM" here? Enlighten me...

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

dolamite wrote:Whats up everyone? I have a question. I have a 2004 G35 sedan with stock 17's on it. Im upgrading my wheels to the 2008 G35 sedan wheels. The new wheels are 18x7.5 (front) 18x8.5(rear) staggard. It says that the stock sizes for that are 225/50/18 front and 245/45/18 rear. Well with that said the Kumho Ecsta SPT's i want to run they dont carry both sizes. They do have the 225/45/18 for the front and the 245/40/18 for the rear. How much difference in fender gap would it be if i ran the original size compared to the Kumhos i want? Is there a big difference between seeing a 50 series compared to a 45 series on a car? Any bit of info will help. Thanks!
I been doing some research. I think i will fork out the extra money and get the 225/50/18 front and 245/45/18 rear.

tollboothwilley
Posts: 3759
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:45 pm
Car: 2003 G35 Sedan w/ NAV
Location: LAS VEGAS!!!
Contact:

Post

PM here is clicking on the profile and emailing

Its be great if we had a PM system set up though....

tollboothwilley
Posts: 3759
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:45 pm
Car: 2003 G35 Sedan w/ NAV
Location: LAS VEGAS!!!
Contact:

Post

you dont have to buy tires from tire rack to get a good price man

check out http://www.tiredeals4less.com

look at the TOYO T1R's in those sizes

I'd check and see if you can fit the 245/45/18 on the front rims, if so go with that, else I'd go with the 235/50/18


User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

i was thinking of maybe going with a 225/50/18 front and a 255/45/18 in the rear. the stock rears are 245/45/18. i was gonna go with the 155/45/18 rear.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

Beaner wrote:
I see that.

How does one "PM" here? Enlighten me...
Imma you beaner.

NICO has used PM and Email synonymously for quite some time, regardless of it's accuracy.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

dolamite wrote:i was thinking of maybe going with a 225/50/18 front and a 255/45/18 in the rear. the stock rears are 245/45/18. i was gonna go with the 155/45/18 rear.
That would work. The rears would only be off by about 1-1.5% versus the original 5%.


User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

the original setup is 225/50/18 front 245/45/18 rear...

can i go 235/50/18 front and 255/45/18 rear without it rubbing or sticking out past the fender walls?

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

Yes, the issue isn't so much width, but sidewall height.

Both ABS and VDC rely on speed sensors from the wheels, if you go with a tire that is too far off (rotationally) from the front to back ratio you run into problems.

I've read that 3% is a safe limit. I'm currently off by 1% on my coupe, because I run a 255/40/19 opposed to a 245/40/19.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

sweet deal. I found some Kumho Ecsta ASX in both sizes on tirerack for a good price. I was just worried about the tires sticking out past the fender wells. 245 to a 255 isnt that much difference.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

oooh i forgot, does it matter that these 2008 sedan wheels are going on a 2004 sedan? you think the fender wells and ride hei ghts are different?

adren77
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:44 am
Car: 2004 G35 Laser Red Coupe 6MT

Post

When I was buying rims I saw that the 2008 G have a way different offset than the previous gen. Previous gen G35s have very weird offset. I would double check it to make sure it will fit right.

19" G35 coupe rims look great on 04 G sedan. Let me know if you want some pictures.

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

the dealer and other tire places, said i should have no problems putting 2008 g35 sedan 7 split spoke wheels on my 2004 g35 sedan

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

Then don't worry so much and got get your new rims and tires

User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

yeah i know. im sorry i was repetetive. i just dont want to get stuck with tires that stick out past the wells of the car. Its for my wifes B-day present.

tollboothwilley
Posts: 3759
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:45 pm
Car: 2003 G35 Sedan w/ NAV
Location: LAS VEGAS!!!
Contact:

Post

They shouldn't stick out, should look great.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 6768
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

You're getting her tires for her b-day?

Unless she's a car enthusiast or you're one of those super practical couples, I'd think about something else to go along with it.


User avatar
dolamite
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:25 pm

Post

I was going to go with the 235/50/18 front and 255/45/18 in rear, and the guy at Tirerack said he couldnt guarantee those would fit, but he said that 235/45/18 front and 255/40/18 rear would fit. I wonder if he told me that because those sizes cost more?


Return to “G35 and G37 Suspension, Brakes, Wheels and Tires”