SmithSR wrote:
At least your guy admits to never actually listening to his pastor's sermons.(the alarmist rhetoric is well-documented)(Destroy the 'White Enemy')
For twenty years.
All face, no substance.
It is possible that because of the Wright affair Obama will suffer for what he pretended to be, rather than for what he really is."-worldnetdaily
Vote for that self-serving, no experience having, new guy using race as a stepping stone for political gain? Never.
Maybe don't mention religion or personal beliefs on either side.
Neither Obama NOR McCain are really ardently religious guys. BOTH of them played to religious institutions to buy votes and credibility.
McCain did it with Rod Parsley to buy credibility with the religious right as he was deemed "not conservative enough".
Obama did it with Jeremiah Wright to buy credibility with the black church establishment as he was deemed "not black enough".
Both men later renounced their associations as they had become embarassing, neither had a history of deep religious conviction. They both understood that religious associations buy votes. It's not great that they went and did this, but I understand that it's necessary. You can't be a successful politician on the national stage in this country and be too openly secular. I happen to WANT public officials who are a little detached from organized religion, so I'll let it slide on BOTH sides in the interest of getting them elected.
Palin is something else, her religious associations are with groups that I consider to be borderline crazy, and they pre-date her public office aspirations. She was an evangelical/Pentecostal nutjob WAY before she was ever a mayor or a governor, it is her defining characteristic, IMO.
I also don't happen to believe that ODrama is a socialist. He's definitely not Clinton, unfortunately, but having read both of his books, I have concluded that while he obviously supports some new regulation, it's well thought out and not explicitly designed to falsely engineer an egalitarian state. I have become increasingly disillusioned with "trickle down" economics in my old age, in that I believe that while it does indeed trickle down, it will no longer necessarily trickle down to Americans, but rather to Indians and Chinese. Maybe we should have a separate thread for this topic, as I think it'd be a robust discussion.