7thGear wrote:now i'm not dissin the NA community or anything, but it clearly hit me that 2.4 L is a little to big for a turbo car, and i'm a turbo junkie.
uhm, no motor is "too big" to use a turbo. seen that new benz...?
2. cons of this motor (as compared to smaller-displacement fours i've owned) - more vibration, and it doesn't like to rev like my other car- after owning a '95 base and now a '91 base coupe for a few months, what it needs (IMO) is hotter cam(s), longer rods, shorter final drive, better flow numbers from the head, and less accessory drag. (these mods might not all work in your favor if you do end up going turbo, but you'll notice this is the "all motor" forum, so i'm answering the question in that context.) pros- it has almost as much torque and hp as my old VR6's did, in a car a few hundred pounds lighter, and it's RWD; 'nuff said.
3. if you beat on it, you'll go through a tank quickly. drive sedately and it's about as good as your average 4-cyl camry/accord.
4. for turbo kits, go to
http://www.realnissan.com/ ; i don't know of anything else kit-like for the single-cam - for supercharger, you'll need to DIY; and my $.02 on that subject is avoid roots, lysholm/centrifugal are ok.
5. in all-motor trim, you might hit 250 crank hp if you have someone really good build your engine for you- but i don't see that (and the rest of the stuff you'd need to do to the car to complement it) happening for $4k CDN. for turbo, go look at a few of the topics in the turbo ka forum.
6. not yet. :pface