New NSX Video

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
LVRS_Jay
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:13 pm
Car: G35

Post

Put this video together for the NSX club of america recently and I just wanted to share.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EvUtqCmHts[/youtube]


I thought I posted this video earlier but not sure what happened.


User avatar
nevertheless
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:12 am
Car: 1993 240sx hatch
1995 Nissan D21
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Contact:

Post

epic

User avatar
hitbychance
Posts: 2066
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:09 pm
Car: 2008 350z
2008 Dodge Ram 1500 4x4 5.7L hemi

Post

thats sick!

User avatar
Pento240sx
Posts: 1562
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:08 pm
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE, 1981 Datsun 210 Deluxe, 1981 Datsun 810 Maxima Deluxe and 1999 Infiniti Q45t.
Location: Central, CA

Post

That is awsome 1 of the few Acuras(hondas) I love.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

one of the most underpowered supercars ever.

I wants me one.....

User avatar
MellowZ32
Posts: 27320
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:29 pm
Car: Pornographer's car
Location: Parts Unknown

Post

me too, Brah!

User avatar
Gold Digger
Posts: 5823
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 8:48 pm
Car: Current:
2011 Infiniti G25X

Former:
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple
1990 Nissan Laurel Club S Turbo Two Tone Pearl

Post

Meh...they aight... :inout:



Not to say I would rock the hell outta one if given the opportunity. I see a blue one around here on some polished BBS meshies. The exhaust note alone is enough to make you tight in the pants.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Gold Digger wrote:Meh...they aight... :inout:



Not to say I would rock the hell outta one if given the opportunity. I see a blue one around here on some polished BBS meshies. The exhaust note alone is enough to make you tight in the pants.
I just rode on one at Summit Point after several years. I had almost forgotten how nice they were.

User avatar
93coupe
Posts: 12924
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:03 pm
Car: crap
Location: Maryland

Post

Bubba1 wrote:
I just rode on one at Summit Point after several years. I had almost forgotten how nice they were.
I love the look but am underwhelmed with the numbers. Though, I have never ridden in, driven or even sat in one. Joel, how tight are the interiors?

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

93coupe wrote:
Bubba1 wrote:
I just rode on one at Summit Point after several years. I had almost forgotten how nice they were.
I love the look but am underwhelmed with the numbers. Though, I have never ridden in, driven or even sat in one. Joel, how tight are the interiors?
It's looks more snug than it is. The seats are comfortable. the passengers legroom feels narrow as it approaches the front, but the drivers position is all business. Love the setup. It's great on a race track, but I can see passengers getting annoyed on a long highway trip.

It's a super driving experience if you get a chance to drive one. The car has a wonderful feel and balance to it, and does everything so well that you want to push it increasingly harder. The lack of low end grunt will keep you from winning a drag race, but it actually feels peppy. Add corners to the mix, and you won't care about the power.

User avatar
Empty V
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:53 am
Car: 2001 Infiniti QX4
1982 Chevy Corvette C3 Shark

Post

Nice dude! The video looks like you had a good budget behind it and obviously you know how to edit and color correct. What cameras did you shoot with? I think the audio needs a lot of work though. If it were me I'd either go back and have a protools guy make make the VO sound more authentic or start over. The music behind is it cool though.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

That video is AWESOME.

Alfador
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 4:55 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Location: The People's Republic of Taxachusetts
Contact:

Post

Epic Indeed

LVRS_Jay
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:13 pm
Car: G35

Post

Thanks for the comments guys.
Empty V wrote:Nice dude! The video looks like you had a good budget behind it and obviously you know how to edit and color correct. What cameras did you shoot with? I think the audio needs a lot of work though. If it were me I'd either go back and have a protools guy make make the VO sound more authentic or start over. The music behind is it cool though.
This video was shot with multiple dslr cameras and was put together in 5 hours prior to the final day of this event. VO was done last minute just to tie in to the footage and received an overwhelming response from the owners when presented at their banquet dinner.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

93coupe wrote:
Bubba1 wrote:
I just rode on one at Summit Point after several years. I had almost forgotten how nice they were.
I love the look but am underwhelmed with the numbers. Though, I have never ridden in, driven or even sat in one. Joel, how tight are the interiors?
the HP number seems week, but if you look at the car's straightline, it was pretty damn impressive when it came out.

Honda made a solid argument against the Ferrari F's of the time. The F355 was marginally faster and a good deal more expensive, especially on the maintenance end.

the Ferrari whens on the exhaust note though....they always seem to do that.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

That's a lot of money to spend on parking lot furniture!
Mr1der wrote: the HP number seems week, but if you look at the car's straightline, it was pretty damn impressive when it came out.

Honda made a solid argument against the Ferrari F's of the time. The F355 was marginally faster and a good deal more expensive, especially on the maintenance end.

the Ferrari whens on the exhaust note though....they always seem to do that.

The only thing the NSX had going for it was that Ayrton Senna helped sort out the chassis, other than that, they're just a massively overpriced Japanese car. It's not very fair to compare them to something as sophisticated as a Ferrari. I sat in one while doing some instructing and found myself more frustrated than anything with the car.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:
The only thing the NSX had going for it was that Ayrton Senna helped sort out the chassis, other than that, they're just a massively overpriced Japanese car. It's not very fair to compare them to something as sophisticated as a Ferrari. I sat in one while doing some instructing and found myself more frustrated than anything with the car.
I agree with Mr1der. when the NSX first came out, they were not overpriced or underpowered. I do recognize Acura dealers raped early buyers like Ford and Nissan dealers did with the Ford GT and GT-R. But by the second model year, you could get one under list price. I do agree they eventually became overpriced when Honda kept raising the price without doing any significant development to it.

Its getting more dificult to find one now that has a stock exhaust, but I thought they sounded nice stock. Very quiet except for when you tromped on it, then it sounded sweet. Clearly not as sweet sounding as a Ferrari, but then again what does?

As far as performance, I think many have become spoiled in recent years because of the recent horsepower war. But those NSX's were quick cars when they first came out. Obviously the 355 was more sophisticated and sounded nicer, (it better considering it's price) but the 355 was actually not much faster than an NSX. Given the outrageous cost of Ferrari ownership, the NSX was a bargain.

I found NSX's to be tougher to instruct beginners as they mask bad habits, but easier for experienced students due that same nice balance. But that's just me.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:That's a lot of money to spend on parking lot furniture!
Mr1der wrote: the HP number seems week, but if you look at the car's straightline, it was pretty damn impressive when it came out.

Honda made a solid argument against the Ferrari F's of the time. The F355 was marginally faster and a good deal more expensive, especially on the maintenance end.

the Ferrari whens on the exhaust note though....they always seem to do that.

The only thing the NSX had going for it was that Ayrton Senna helped sort out the chassis, other than that, they're just a massively overpriced Japanese car. It's not very fair to compare them to something as sophisticated as a Ferrari. I sat in one while doing some instructing and found myself more frustrated than anything with the car.
you saying the NSX wasn't sophisticated?

being the first production car with an aluminum moncoque chassis has to count for something....

I love the Italians...but the bastards over complicate things. The NSX was the typical Japanese approach to a supercar and it got the job done quite well

I'm sad the V10 project got canned. Honda's KISS approach to building cars is fantastic.

what killed the mystique of the NSX was the later years when the competition was well beyond it. It was still a very capable car, but sorely lacking in the power department.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Mr1der wrote:
you saying the NSX wasn't sophisticated?

being the first production car with an aluminum moncoque chassis has to count for something....

I love the Italians...but the bastards over complicate things. The NSX was the typical Japanese approach to a supercar and it got the job done quite well

I'm sad the V10 project got canned. Honda's KISS approach to building cars is fantastic.

what killed the mystique of the NSX was the later years when the competition was well beyond it. It was still a very capable car, but sorely lacking in the power department.
Sophistication aside, you have drive one in anger to really understand why they're more silly than supercar. Under heavy braking they push very bad (like frustratingly bad) and their out of pocket acceleration capability is later than my crappy Corolla. On a much more open course (think Monza) I'm sure they're fine, but on Summit Main I wanted to punch the steering wheel like Samir in Office Space.

Considering a Viper was in it's price range and only weighed around 200 lbs more, the NSX is hardly worth it.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:
Mr1der wrote:
you saying the NSX wasn't sophisticated?

being the first production car with an aluminum moncoque chassis has to count for something....

I love the Italians...but the bastards over complicate things. The NSX was the typical Japanese approach to a supercar and it got the job done quite well

I'm sad the V10 project got canned. Honda's KISS approach to building cars is fantastic.

what killed the mystique of the NSX was the later years when the competition was well beyond it. It was still a very capable car, but sorely lacking in the power department.
Sophistication aside, you have drive one in anger to really understand why they're more silly than supercar. Under heavy braking they push very bad (like frustratingly bad) and their out of pocket acceleration capability is later than my crappy Corolla. On a much more open course (think Monza) I'm sure they're fine, but on Summit Main I wanted to punch the steering wheel like Samir in Office Space.

Considering a Viper was in it's price range and only weighed around 200 lbs more, the NSX is hardly worth it.
I guess we have different tastes. The last NSX I was in was on Summit's Shenandoah. I thought it was delightful. Between a Viper and NSX for street use, I'd take an NSX long before a Viper. Viper is too primitive, especially the first gen. But for track use, (and I've tried both at the track) I'm not sure which one I'd want more because they are both so different in their approach.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:
I guess we have different tastes. The last NSX I was in was on Summit's Shenandoah. I thought it was delightful. Between a Viper and NSX for street use, I'd take an NSX long before a Viper. Viper is too primitive, especially the first gen. But for track use, (and I've tried both at the track) I'm not sure which one I'd want more because they are both so different in their approach.
I do a lot of very heavy trail braking, it's how I get the car to rotate for me. I've driven other MR cars before but none as LONG as an NSX (Elise, Exige, MR2's, MRS), and the NSX pushed a very unsightly amount.

Viper is about the same length, has a better wheelbase, is faster, better powerband and has plenty of room for different wheel configurations to minimize unsprung mass and maximize contact patch. Primordial it may be, but you're also talking to a guy who doesn't have a car made in the past two decades =)

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:I do a lot of very heavy trail braking, it's how I get the car to rotate for me. I've driven other MR cars before but none as LONG as an NSX (Elise, Exige, MR2's, MRS), and the NSX pushed a very unsightly amount.

Viper is about the same length, has a better wheelbase, is faster, better powerband and has plenty of room for different wheel configurations to minimize unsprung mass and maximize contact patch. Primordial it may be, but you're also talking to a guy who doesn't have a car made in the past two decades =)
I agree with what you said about the specs, and power of the Viper. My issue is that the primordial driving experiences I had with the first gen Viper, while great fun on a race track, IMHO do not translate well to the street. It's easy to tolerate the heavy clutch & brakes, slushy gearbox, burning legs (left leg by the exhaust under the door sill, right leg by the hot transmission tunnel), and poor front visibility when the adrenaline is pumping. But it would become annoying quickly to me on a road trip. The NSX is a much more forgiving and "tighter" car for both street and track. I don't recall experiencing a lot of push in any of the NSX's I've driven, but then again, I never autocrossed one.

User avatar
Empty V
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:53 am
Car: 2001 Infiniti QX4
1982 Chevy Corvette C3 Shark

Post

LVRS_Jay wrote:This video was shot with multiple dslr cameras and was put together in 5 hours prior to the final day of this event.
So you were able to get helicopter shots 5 hours before you shot it? 100% s*** and now 0 credibility.
LVRS_Jay wrote:VO was done last minute just to tie in to the footage and received an overwhelming response from the owners when presented at their banquet dinner.
Well of course. I've got a buddy who does home videos and his friends love them because they see themselves in them and they're complete crap. :facepalm:


Return to “General Chat”