Why Joe is our friend.oldmako wrote:Q45tech hit the nail on the head regarding parts....they are very few makers of decent after market suspension parts for these cars so you are left with the dealer. Excellent quality parts to be sure...but them mothers are pricey.
No way are any parts supplied by American third party retailers of Chinese goods near the qulaity of OEM. What do you not understand about lowerst bidder and how they got that way?RAP wrote:That's why folks who buy old cars like Auto Zone, NAPA, and others, first. OEM is reserved for the "Up against the wall folks" with no other options.
JACK
Exactly. Comparing GM to any Japanese or probably now Korean automaker in terms of quality is just not possible. Tell me, how much after market is there for the Northstar? From what I understand, presuming your thesis is correct, it is in dire need of upgraded aftermarket parts. Maybe the paucity of such parts is an indicator of the lack of sophistication of USA aftermarket parts sourcers? Notice alll the high end tuners are European or Japanese, not American based.jimbyjimb wrote:I think his point may have been that on much older engines, say a small block Chevy, the options on part purchase increase since the aftermarket is so huge many companies make parts that exceed even modern standards by a long shot for these very old designs. This is obviously not so for the Q.
Well that's good, but this is not a forum about old tech cast iron, pushrod OHV V8.jimbyjimb wrote:Comparing an old engine with 50 years of aftermarket parts development to a 15 year old design is impossibly rediculous. I understood his point none-the-less.
Now do you really think that Nissan is above doing the lowest bidder thing? They are under the same financial pressure as any other makers of cars. In any event NAPA does handle parts made in Japan by Mitsubishi an others that supply after market and OEM.maxnix wrote:No way are any parts supplied by American third party retailers of Chinese goods near the qulaity of OEM. What do you not understand about lowerst bidder and how they got that way?
To paraphrase H. L. Mencken,
"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."
Yes, Nissan sources their own parts or from traditional suppliers. Could it be you don't understand the Japanese keiretsu business model? Nah, you know it all, right?RAP wrote:
Now do you really think that Nissan is above doing the lowest bidder thing?
In closing your quoting of Mencken as a reference to question my intelligence is another example of why no one respects you on this board. Life must be mean to you?
Since this is a Q forum and everything is compared to it, The Northstar has a seemingly HUGE aftermarket when compared to any year of Q. There are any number of hard parts available through name-brand performance part dealers ranging from carb kits to stroker kits to heads. I never said these engines NEEDED these parts, I said the aftermarket would benefit everyone by driving competition to make better parts for less money. This would benefit ANYONE.maxnix wrote:
Exactly. Comparing GM to any Japanese or probably now Korean automaker in terms of quality is just not possible. Tell me, how much after market is there for the Northstar?
Amen to that Cochise.My skanky old Silverado has 230K on the original engine, transmission (try that on a Q), shaft and differential. It's a beast. Apples and oranges sure but how can one argue with the bang for the buck when the life (and cost)of the vehicle is amortized over that lifespan? It burns crap gas, and never requires a 20 dollar can of BG44k. It's got another 100k in it easy.It does piss me off that I have to worry about the slushbox on a $50K car with only 128K. The trade off is that the BarbieQ is silent at 90 mph....and will gladly go 120 if I can just find the right stretch of copless road.jimbyjimb wrote:
I think the quality of the old iron horse V-8's speaks for itself. They may be simplistic, but that is their single greatest advantage over new-school tech. Less to break, less to fix. With modern engineered parts and fluids an old iron horse will last almost as long, if not in some cases longer than newer engines before needing a drasticly cheaper rebuild that will again last as long. Many modern engines are designed to not even be rebuilt, can't bore them. You're right, comparing quality isn't possible since an engine that's been on the road for 40 years is obviously very high-quality indeed. How many cars built in the last 10-20 years will be around another 20-30-40 years? I bet my 69 F250 will still be on the road in that amount of time, unless we all switch to hovercrafts and wheeled vehicles are outlawed.
New technology is wonderful, more power per cubic inch, smoother, quieter, less emissions per hp, longer engine life, so many great things. New cars are also built to throw away when yer done with 'em.
Talking about other makes and models may actually spur much growth, more than isolating just one make and model. We aren't supposed to be on here selling cars, just having polite conversation not to be taken personally and trying to help a brotha out, or seeking help ourselves.