Post by
MinisterofDOOM »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/ministerofdoom-u16506.html
Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:53 pm
The idea of multiple combustion cycles per crankshaft rotation is interesting. Where traditional Wankel-cycle rotaries operate best at high RPM, this one adds more efficiency to that by effectively splitting the displacement into three evenly-spaced phases across all 360 degrees of crankshaft rotation. You'd probably be making very little brake torque, maybe even less than a Wankel engine at comparable displacement. But you can always use gear reduction to make what you need from that. I suspect these engines would work great in generators, hydraulic pumps or other purposes where they can run at a specifically-designed optimal RPM.
The core problem with rotaries is one that piston engines overcame a long time ago: lack of mechanical valves. One of the strongest areas of optimization in piston engines over its history has been valve control. Going from reed valves (basically equivalent to what's happening in a rotary) to valve-in-block to separate intake and exhaust valvetrains and even separate active timing control and now even looking at individual per-valve, per-cylinder valve control. Aspiration timing control is HUGE for power, efficiency, and emissions. You have no method of control that in a rotary. You have an RPM-bound static intake and exhaust event and that's it. You can't modulate valve lift, duration, or timing, which are very important aspects of modern engines and the reason a modern engine can idle smoothly and then rev to 7500 and never miss a beat. The intake tuning that makes sense at 750rpm is different than the same at 2000rpm, or 4000rpm, or 6000rpm. But with a rotary, you just get one setting, and in an automobile you need to be able to cover the entire rev range without getting winded or you're going to struggle. If these rotaries like things best above 6,000rpm, they still have to idle somewhere efficient or they're impractical. And without the ability to change how it breathes along the way, you're going to end up compromising and not being very good at either end.