Post by
LocAL_anarchy »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/local-anarchy-u41619.html
Sat Apr 04, 2015 2:32 am
I'm definitely conflicted about this. I've always been a fan of the lore of the coast-to-coast record. I've driven cross-country several times the last few years, and I've always dreamed about doing it. I mean, come on, how awesome is it?!!
That being said, I'm a believer in the old-school way. Just hop in a fast car and go! And whether or not their record was legit, Rawlings and Collins attempt was exactly that. I believe their Ferrari was stock with only a Valentine1. I realize the argument of no data points, but considering they put hardly any planning into it, I'm fine with their going by the clock.
With Alex Roy, I felt his initial record was tarnished. Not so much that his M5 was heavily modified or that he put months into the planning, but that he used aircraft to spot ahead, had various police lights and sirens installed, and his navigator had NVG. Kinda sours it for me. And with this new record, I can appreciate the awesomeness of the car he built(GTR Q50!) and the planning it must have taken. But the technology factor is even greater. And smoke-screen? Considered installing oil slick? Now we're getting into sheer recklessness, regardless of the safety protocols installed.
Was he seriously going to smoke-screen pursing cops if need be??? Imagine the backlash if he did, and it caused someone to get injured or die. The media would be all over it, and law-enforement agencies would paint us car enthusiasts in an even gworse negative light than they already do. I can already see it happening regardless once the footage of the run gets released. I dunno, man. Maybe I'm just getting old. :/
What I would like to see is the records broken down into various categories. Modified/Unmodified vehicles. Aircraft-Assisted/NonAA, etc.