am i missin something here???Barry626 wrote:Don't be jealous...Not very becoming
as much as you may love the 370z, i wouldnt reccomend it if you felt uncomfortable, jacket or not. not whn your talking about a car, and one with a $30,000+ tag.i do reccomend a manual though. i cant tell you the last time i drove stick. All my cars i have owned have been auto, but i would be getting the 6speed in this car. With the syncrorev-match on the new Z, it will be easier to pick up on it. not to mention the fun of a manual with a car like this.EOrdonez3229 wrote:
I'm 6'2", but I'm also 215lbs. I'm a big guy. I felt like my arms and shoulder were tight, and my back is wide so I was SNUG in that seat, to say the least lol But, I was wearing a 3/4 length wool coat when I got in, so that cut back on space.
I hate that I felt uncomfortable. When I go to the auto show I'll hop in with no coat/jacket and see if I fit more comfortably. I'm thinking I should get a manual, bc I hear it's easy to learn on it. I only drove stick once, so . . . .
the synchro rev match is only used when downshifting the car in a heel toe situation, like on the track. it will have no bearing in helping the driver engage the clutch or change gearsAltima_Coupe wrote:. With the syncrorev-match on the new Z, it will be easier to pick up on it. not to mention the fun of a manual with a car like this.
no. it is also used during upshifting:ldstang50 wrote:
the synchro rev match is only used when downshifting the car in a heel toe situation, like on the track. it will have no bearing in helping the driver engage the clutch or change gears
I just came home from test driving a G37 with the Sport Package - definitely would be a better choice for me. I had more room and felt more comfortable. This car comes with manual tranmission that has Downshift Rev Match (same as 370) but I think I'll still need an automatic. The traffic here in Ocean County is insane since we are over populated, and being stuck every single day commuting to and from work would be a pain in the butt with the manual - bumper to bumper to bumper to bumper lolAltima_Coupe wrote:
as much as you may love the 370z, i wouldnt reccomend it if you felt uncomfortable, jacket or not. not whn your talking about a car, and one with a $30,000+ tag.i do reccomend a manual though. i cant tell you the last time i drove stick. All my cars i have owned have been auto, but i would be getting the 6speed in this car. With the syncrorev-match on the new Z, it will be easier to pick up on it. not to mention the fun of a manual with a car like this.
Where did you even read that I said I'm test driving the M3? I couldn't find it in this thread - but I posted it in another 370 thread.spitalul2bad wrote:Also test driving the M3 are we? If you have that much cash on hand to spend... take the german way out and get the M3. Much better interior, V8 with 414 HP (420 some say) and a revlimit of 8000 rpm!
If money's tight, stay with the G.
yes, it might be a Nissan, but it is a 96k nissan that can beat a 150k Audi R8, and a 200k Porsche 911 on track (base on the race by best motoring).in my perspective, it worth the money for the performance.BlackSmoke wrote: But that GTR hmmph, I cant bring myself to spend $96k on a Nissan. Way overpriced.
1. You should go test drive before running a bunch of stats. I KNOW that car does not do 4.9, prob not 5.0 either and if it does 5.1 then I dont think 2/10ths of a sec is worth the hype.galanw wrote:i'm sorry for being negative here. but seems like most of u guys are being unfair to the new 370z.
1) 350z 0-60 in 5.3-5.5sec (if i'm not mistaken). 370z 0-60 in 4.9-5.1 sec, and the record is based on testing in track. would that be real significant on a normal road from a test drive for that 0.3-0.5 sec diff?
2) many of the new features that the 370z has are mainly focus on cornering performance, like the rev syn transmission (sub of heel-n-toe), lighter wheels, shorter wheelbase, etc. it's not just about the acceleration on the straight line.
3) the new interior design has great improvement over the old one, the new navi, push button start (sorry, but i have to say the old keys are real ugly), dual climate, new leather seats, etc.
4) as one of u mentioned, the car hasn't broken in yet.
heh. I'd take a 6spd 370z over a R35 anyday. Sure it can rail on alot of cars twice its price, but it takes no skill at all to drive. It's a toy, if anybody can drive it its a toy. i like shifting and hitting a clutch, not pushing in a few buttons and putting it in race transmission mode like im making some sort of awesome cappuccino.galanw wrote:
yes, it might be a Nissan, but it is a 96k nissan that can beat a 150k Audi R8, and a 200k Porsche 911 on track (base on the race by best motoring).in my perspective, it worth the money for the performance.
1) running the stats means i've done research before commenting the car that i'm planning to buy, and i think this is how a person should do before making any kind of purchasing.the stats were released by various magazines which they hired professional to test drive it. if you for sure that u know it won't run 0-60 in 4.9sec, maybe you can google it before u made such comments, coz that numbers was recorded by various sources. yes, i'll definitely go test drive it and compare to the 350z which my friend owns.BlackSmoke wrote:
1. You should go test drive before running a bunch of stats. I KNOW that car does not do 4.9, prob not 5.0 either and if it does 5.1 then I dont think 2/10ths of a sec is worth the hype.
2.If you have read the thread I stated that I took it down a winding road. You must have missed when I said it did not feel much different than mine.
3. Having a "Push Button" to start does not make it a better sports car by any means. Only large gauge to the left is different the rest is basically the same and no one who tracks or runs there car hard is really concerned with the function of the navi.
4. The torque feels the same under the foot so I wonder exactly when that break in period happens how much it will help.
just sharing what my real world experience. hope i didn't offense anyone.
i agree with you, yes R35 is easy to drive w/ its awd system, and yes shifting and hitting a clutch would be more fun.but if you take other competitors of the r35, such as the r8, porsche 911 awd version, lambo gallardo awd version....they are all easy to drive with paddle shifters and many other buttons....Dasoupdude wrote:
heh. I'd take a 6spd 370z over a R35 anyday. Sure it can rail on alot of cars twice its price, but it takes no skill at all to drive. It's a toy, if anybody can drive it its a toy. i like shifting and hitting a clutch, not pushing in a few buttons and putting it in race transmission mode like im making some sort of awesome cappuccino.
Future has given all those once real worthy car mkers into a bunch of gizmo filled vehicles,the skill coming from driving those cars doesn't even come from the driver anymore but the car itself. A real sports car should be able to kill you, instead of having Johnny Wannaberacer being watched by some nanny road monitoring hoo hah.galanw wrote:
i agree with you, yes R35 is easy to drive w/ its awd system, and yes shifting and hitting a clutch would be more fun.but if you take other competitors of the r35, such as the r8, porsche 911 awd version, lambo gallardo awd version....they are all easy to drive with paddle shifters and many other buttons....