ks13 wrote:dude all you need is pistons, thats the weak point if your going into the motor.
stock rods are fine.
nissan engineers knew a thing or two when this motor was designed.
your motor will be more reliable with stock rods/stock matched bearings (numbers on crank, numbers on block) and some forged pistons.
measuring clearances is extremely critical, and alot of the time even though you may have paid for it, doesnt mean the machine shop did it.
double triple check all lower end clearances.
I disagree.What fails on the CA? Rod bolts. CA18 rod bolts are small and they stretch. Even if you get upgraded bolts they are still the same size just a better material. For someone going for 400s I would ditch them completely. For pistons, they both melt. Any piston will fail if abused even forged ones. You will need to replace pistons on a rebuild anyway. The only CA piston failures I have seen personally is destroyed piston lands from detonation at the quench pads.I am not confident I could build a 500+hp engine and tune it perfect. I can't afford a $10,000.00 "whoops" so I am shooting for 400hp. This is what I will be doing.First I am going 2.0 liter with a tall deck block so I will have an advantage over the 18 builders; bigger piston crown area, longer stroke and improved rod angles. I will also enjoy larger rod journals and piston pins.
For the machine work I will have the head and block decked to ensure they are perfectly square for optimum sealing. I will have the valve guides replaced with bronze ones and check that all the valves are straight and riding in their seats correctly. I will be cutting out the quench pads for high boost work to combat detonation.
I will use heavy duty valve springs and titanium retainers for higher RPM stability. Notice I say "higher" not "high". I do not subscribe to the opinion that a CA18 is particularly "revable". The valves are small and the ports are not very big. I don't think it will flow much better in the super high RPMs so to me it would be needless to beat the **** out of the bottom end running the motor up to 9k if the head can't flow it anyway. Just my opinion based upon what I am looking at, I have no data, use your own judgement. I will be using a 4-port head which should help; it has more port area.
For the bottom end were I using a CA18 crank I would definately have it dynamic balanced, preferrably with the bobweights to simulate the piston and rod weights but at the minimum balanced to itself and bring the rod and piston combos as close to each other in weight as I could. I will be using pauter rods and wiseco pistons.
400hp is over twice the power the CA18 had from the factory, this is nothing to take lightly. We are working with a 1.8 liter here gents, it has to work harder than other engines to make the same power and that takes prep. Go to your fridge and take out that big plastic bottle of Coke. That's 2 liters! That is more than displacement than these engines have and we are asking it to contain and transmit 400hp! Show some love and give your engine the tools to do the job. I would trust a stock CA18 long block to 300hp, it can take it. Past that, the amount of beating and your margin for error start ramping up very steeply and it's not a matter of if but when something falls short. A voltage dip hiccups your fuel pump, an actuator hose pops off, thermostat jams and temps shoot up etc, silly $6 **** and BOOM!
I am going to build my motor to make power below 8k on large volumes of boost. I am selecting parts and methods as if I was going for 600hp. I like to overengineer, I drive like an *** and I need redundancy in my mill for those moments when I am not using good judgement. Stock parts were not designed with big power in mind. They were designed to just barely exceed expectations withing budgetary limits, not the breeding ground for overengineering.
I could see trying to do it on stock gear myself just for ****s and giggles, to see if I could, but I could not in good concience advise another to do the same.