Post by
SmoovC »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/smoovc-u179392.html
Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:09 am
Personally, if equipment options are identical, and the CarFax is clean on both, I would pop for the $6k to get option 2 with 22k less miles. In my world, that is almost 4 years worth of driving.
There are many factors that will affect your decision, but in saying that you want to keep the car for 5 years, and assuming you drive an average of 12k a year:
Option 1 will have 118,000 miles on it after 5 years; option 2 will have only 96,000. That means option 2 will still have the remainder of the warranty, which is a great selling point; assuming the CPO warranty is transferable. Or, you could drive it another few months while under warranty. Further, you could drive option 2 for almost 2 years more and end up at the same miles after only 5 years of driving in option 1.
Just my thoughts; I always try to find the "sweet spot" between low miles and price.