8:5, you got both fuel options and the SDS to keep detonation away, the engine will feel much better to drive if you go higher comp.I built a 7.7:1 CA a few years ago, veeery laggy compared to a 8:5 one.Couldn´t feel the difference at high revs but boring when you wanted to drive around in town at low speeds.BACARDI_DWB wrote:Alright guys. I am about to order my custom pistons from wiseco within the next month or so. block is at the machinist and i am thinking about overboring to 86mm vice what i was originally go with just a 84mm. I am really concidering the 86mm to beable to get going a little faster. now where i am stuck at is my compression ratio that i want to run. I want to keep it low since i am basically building this engine as a boost dependant engine. so i am thinking 8.0:1 or a 7.5:1. This would require alot more boost out of the turbo to run the same hp as if i would run 8.5:1 or 9.0:1. i know for sure i do not want to run more than 8.5:1. I already have a GT35R set aside for me, SO i already know i am going to need to run high boost levels to get any sort of good power out of that turbo.
Thoughts?
btw power goals are 500+ hp custom intake is being fab'd up right now. head is at ferrara for larger ports/ valve designrods are pauterexhaust manifold is custom equal length. 44mm external wga.63 ar housingcam specs have not been decided quite yet1000cc injectors will be in the works managed by SDS EM4
what do you guys think?7.8:18.0:18.5:1or something inbetween...
I can get E85 fairly easy. I have 8.5:1 compression. Can i use it?float_6969 wrote:Why not bump the compression up to 9.5-10:1 and run it on E85? 100-105 octane. I'm working on doing that right now so what I can run more optimal timing. Even with premium I'm only running 5° total timing at 14psi with my AFR's down around 11:1, and I still get some knock now and then. I've added Toluene to the tank and gotten the octane up to about 100 and I was able to run about 15° total timing at 14psi and by my butt-o-meter I picked up an extra 10-20HP. I might have been able to run even more timing, but I was getting low on gas.
Of course if E85 isn't readily available in your area, then ignore everything I've just said....
I´ve tuned a few cars in CA using your 93 octane, no problems there. Not the same engines but 8.5:1 and higher.Used the same settings as our 98 octane and got the same results.My next CA will run at least 9.5:1 and E85, really nice to have that angry bottom torque.BACARDI_DWB wrote:yeah low compression is where i want to stay. thinking about 8.3-8.5 now as what sweedish mike was warning me about around town driving.
head is at ferrara for valve sizing.
about having a CA with 86mm pistons here you go:
http://www.hot.ee/nscw/driftking6.jpg86.5mm to be precise. but that could be a fudge so i am going to let my machinist tell me
My euro spec 1997 audi a3 1.8t with 150hp runs a 9.5:1 with a max boost of about 12-13psi. i am pretty sure the head design is a lot better for sure. and 20V does seem to help quite a bit.BACARDI_DWB wrote:well i know audi's run 10.1:1 stock on low 6psi of boost and make good horsepower but they also have a better fuel atomization. i am trying to research that now.
I´m pretty sure he´s talking about the newer FSI engine, direct injected and high comp ratio.new200guy wrote:My euro spec 1997 audi a3 1.8t with 150hp runs a 9.5:1 with a max boost of about 12-13psi. i am pretty sure the head design is a lot better for sure. and 20V does seem to help quite a bit.