If memory serves, my 92 SE was built in virginia....daemonyk wrote:Consider the following. If memory serves, every single usdm 240sx was built and assembled in kyushu japan (with the 'verts being 'vert'ed once imported), hence the J on the VIN. So really, every single usdm 240sx already was actually imported from japan. Unlike, say, an altima, which was made and assmbled in mexico or canada or not japan per se. So, every 240sx is already 100% JDM, and they were even kind enough to make them street legal in the US from jump
Because Nissan never had them legalized per National Highway Transportation and Safety Board (crash testing) nor was the EPA given a chance to clear them emissions wise. Motorex proved that the R33 could pass the crash safety test, but even if the car exceeds national standards, it doesn't mean much unless the cars are tested by or for those governing bodies.Cruz23 wrote:wise words. you are right, but i dont understand how come s15 isnt legal not the skylines oh well thanks for the respones
I am fairly certain they all came from Japan. Not that it really matters.mechanicalmoron wrote:If memory serves, my 92 SE was built in virginia....daemonyk wrote:Consider the following. If memory serves, every single usdm 240sx was built and assembled in kyushu japan (with the 'verts being 'vert'ed once imported), hence the J on the VIN. So really, every single usdm 240sx already was actually imported from japan. Unlike, say, an altima, which was made and assmbled in mexico or canada or not japan per se. So, every 240sx is already 100% JDM, and they were even kind enough to make them street legal in the US from jump
I assume most of the car started in japan, but it was built here. (I could be wrong, not trying to be a jerk. But I think I looked up my VIN and that's what I got. Or maybe it says so on the little plaque)
That's weird - you sure it wasn't just distributed or modified in VA? Is the 1st character of the VIN a "J"? No worries - If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. No harm in telling me so. I could have been mistaken as well, and it could be just the KA engines in the 240 that were made in kyushu rather than mexico - but I def remember there was something special about the 240's where they were exclusively sourced from japan.mechanicalmoron wrote:If memory serves, my 92 SE was built in virginia....daemonyk wrote:Consider the following. If memory serves, every single usdm 240sx was built and assembled in kyushu japan (with the 'verts being 'vert'ed once imported), hence the J on the VIN. So really, every single usdm 240sx already was actually imported from japan. Unlike, say, an altima, which was made and assmbled in mexico or canada or not japan per se. So, every 240sx is already 100% JDM, and they were even kind enough to make them street legal in the US from jump
I assume most of the car started in japan, but it was built here. (I could be wrong, not trying to be a jerk. But I think I looked up my VIN and that's what I got. Or maybe it says so on the little plaque)
Thank you!blkvrtswp wrote:All S13 & S14 were exclusively assembled in Japan, KA engines included.
Cruz23 wrote:yea but haven't been watching it in a while lol. why?
Motorex mostly lied about what they crashed, thus discrediting the car, nissan, and the owners.Hijacker wrote:Because Nissan never had them legalized per National Highway Transportation and Safety Board (crash testing) nor was the EPA given a chance to clear them emissions wise. Motorex proved that the R33 could pass the crash safety test, but even if the car exceeds national standards, it doesn't mean much unless the cars are tested by or for those governing bodies.Cruz23 wrote:wise words. you are right, but i dont understand how come s15 isnt legal not the skylines oh well thanks for the respones
Well of course they only should have discredited themselves, but in reality, skyline is a dirty word, and few people have ANY idea why. It's thougherally discredited in general. The only way to reverse that would be to have them all fully legal.Hijacker wrote:Motorex filed the R32 and the R34 with R33 paperwork, which worked for a while until the NHTSB got wind of it. They only crashed the R33, which showed only minimal changing was needed to meet national crash standards. They were shut down because of the paperwork being fudged. They only discredited themselves.
It would certaily be a fun idea, but given the cost and logistics involved it's far more practical to do an RB25. It can be done and has been done, but generally cannot and has not been done w/o large amounts of modding and fabbing and money. RB25 is way easier, way cheaper, and much less modding needed. Also don't underestimate the KA-T or the SR options. It's all about what you want to do with the car. So, what DO you want to do with the car?Cruz23 wrote:i hadn't watched that episode of mcm till you mentioned it and dam that s15 looks mad nice and by the way would it be a good idea to put an rb26 in my car
Valid. I tend to largely forget about emissions testing and stuff... California, fageddaboutit - Likely not workable in most counties. Here in Florida though you can do pretty much anything as long as you're not blowing smoke everywhere or otherwise generating an unsafe condition. I guess check your local and state regulations - that will tell you what is and isn't legal. Could be handy to know.biggie wrote:Wow this is still going on.
Also much to consider with illegal engines. Especially given your car is OBDII and would need to consider where you are located and if you would be caught.