i've seen countless people use teh uego w/o any problems. If you replace the sensor as they ask, you should be just fine... but if I was to do it again, I would buy a innovate cause to get the AEM to link to the PFC is a ***** and a half.Carl H wrote:if you like pissing into the wind and wasting money then buy an aem.high failure rate on sensors and it wont even bother telling you that its going bad...example friends neo the aem uego claims its chilling at 16.5:1 at idle but runs smooth...riiiiiiight.
Carl, have your buddy check to make sure he has no exhaust leaks. Even a small leak (up or down stream) can make any UEGO read significantly lean at idle. An easy way to know if it is running right is if you know the stock narrowband is good, and the ECU is closing the loop around the narrowband. Even with a small exhuast leak the UEGO should read the standard 14.7ish:1 under a highway cruise. If your buddies car reads off at idle, but correct at a highway cruise then most likely an exhuast leak is the culprit.Carl H wrote:if you like pissing into the wind and wasting money then buy an aem.high failure rate on sensors and it wont even bother telling you that its going bad...example friends neo the aem uego claims its chilling at 16.5:1 at idle but runs smooth...riiiiiiight.
That's really weird. The AEM UEGO uses a 'standard' voltage output... it should have been a cakewalk to interface to just about any standalone. Just as easy as the innovate, NGK, or PLX.Gasoline AFRs are 10:1 AFR = 0v and 20:1 AFR = 5v. In PFC you just go to the auxiliaries menu and tell it 0v = 10 and 5v = 20 on the input you ran from the gauge. Simple as that.Largekid wrote:i've seen countless people use teh uego w/o any problems. If you replace the sensor as they ask, you should be just fine... but if I was to do it again, I would buy a innovate cause to get the AEM to link to the PFC is a ***** and a half.
That can't be right. You would never get it anywhere close if it were digital. The Uego says it has a 0-5V analog output. http://forum.aempower.com/foru...=4370Largekid wrote:I wish it was that easy...the PFC takes a analog input signal and the AEM unit outputs a digital. You can play w/ the parameters to get it to read close...but it will never be exact unfortunately.
This is incorrect!Largekid wrote:I wish it was that easy...the PFC takes a analog input signal and the AEM unit outputs a digital. You can play w/ the parameters to get it to read close...but it will never be exact unfortunately.
was mounted to close to the outlet of the turbo, aem says to install sensor 36" away from the outlet of the turbo in the instruction bookletCarl H wrote:if you like pissing into the wind and wasting money then buy an aem.high failure rate on sensors and it wont even bother telling you that its going bad...example friends neo the aem uego claims its chilling at 16.5:1 at idle but runs smooth...riiiiiiight.
I was backwards, my bad. The PFC only takes a digital while the AEM uses a analog signal. The blue wire sends a signal that only the AEM EMS can read properly. There are ways around it, they have been talked about on the datalogit yahoo group, but it is not a direct wire in and go ordeal. I love my AEM unit though and will keep it...just pointing out facts for someone researching the topic i guess.WhatsADSM wrote:
This is incorrect!
The AEM gauge has both a serial output (blue wire), to do stuff like datalogging with a laptop and hyperterminal.
But also has a standard 0-5v output (white wire).
I did a google search for the instruction manual:http://www.schnitzracing.com/manuals/AEMWBK.pdf
Page 4 has the wires listed. Pages 5-6 show the analog output table.