If he wants to go with your route, then I say dump the car to someone who can actually FIX IT right instead of killing part of the car. There is already little to none Q45a's out there as it is.qship96 wrote:
I agree- 1st change the chain guides, then convert that overcomplicated expensive suspension to conventional using tokiko shocks and standard springs....then you just have the ongoing $3,000 per year in normal Q crap.
I cant imagine anyone dropping $6,000 on a old Q to rehab the active suspension with the idea to further spend another $3,000 on it every 60K miles!!!! Conversion to standard suspension is a small fraction of that amount!maxnix wrote:To get completely correct with all 9 accumulators and 4 actuators, budget $6K, then $3K /60K miles thereafter.
Difficult to think of a more advanced or sophisticated modification than the G50 active suspension when it is fully restored.BLACKonBLACK98 wrote:afaik the op is planning to mod the car,
electrical problems? rust? sounding more and more like a something you should get away from asap. the g50 is expensive to restore/maintain in average condition. you start adding in irregular problems and... one thing is for sure, i would not be putting a dollar into anything but repairs.My President is Black wrote:well with the active suspension i really have not put to much thought into it i have thought much more about maintenance and my a/c since the suspension doesn't bother me TOO much right now. But when it comes to it i would prefer to just eliminate the system and have one less thing to worry about and just save up for some nice coils.
On another note i took my car to an a/c shop to get a diagnostic test and they said its something electrical and they kept it for 3 days i just got it back today, they said they have no idea how to fix it. So i was like grrreat, so im not sure what my next step is i was going to just get my windows tinted tomorrow to hopefully keep it a little cooler inside. Thoughts?
Also in your guys opinion should i a) believe i have metal guides and forget about itb) take apart my engine to confirm that i in fact do
Another thing i actually live only a few hours from Atlanta where i believe T3 is so that could be an option for something.
Also i was working on my car earlier vacuuming it fixing up a rust spot and so on when it started poring like no other instantly ( f***ing florida ) so i ran into the house not realizing i left my lights on so when i went back out my car was f***ing dead. fail.
as advanced and sopisticated as it may be, if it doesn't do what you want it to then it's pretty worthless imo.maxnix wrote:Difficult to think of a more advanced or sophisticated modification than the G50 active suspension when it is fully restored.
Some people are happy with the ride of a Conestoga wagon. Should we all be? I think not!BLACKonBLACK98 wrote:
as advanced and sopisticated as it may be, if it doesn't do what you want it to then it's pretty worthless imo.
well there is only very minor rust because it came from a snowy area, its just in the bottom of the back right door in the crack, which im not concerned about i already got it to look 10x betters, and the electrical is only the a/c and thats only what "tires plus" said so im gonna try taking it to a a/c specific shop.BLACKonBLACK98 wrote:
electrical problems? rust? sounding more and more like a something you should get away from asap. the g50 is expensive to restore/maintain in average condition. you start adding in irregular problems and... one thing is for sure, i would not be putting a dollar into anything but repairs.
just a thought, but if you really want a q maybe you should consider selling yours and purchasing a road worthy 94-96. savings on the chain guides and active suspension alone would pretty much cover the current going rate. you still won't be out of the woods but if you buy wisely you could eliminate immediate costs and focus on saving.
You must admit that putting those damn things in THIS engine was monstrously stupid, and the guy has valid bias. They are clearly the achilles heel of the earlier cars and for no good reason other than for Nissan to save about 30 cents during production. Sure, 30 cents times a gazillion units it a ton of coin and all that, but plastic is notoriously life limited, particularly when it lives where there are large temp fluctuations. Guys here go ape regarding cracks in the plastic fans after all....aces805 wrote:Dude, the chain guides are uber important.... Now, he firmly believes that Nissan is out to build failing engines as a car company and will refuse to drive any Nissan product. All because of plastic chain guides.
Replace your chain guides, pretty please, with sugar on top...
Hey. f*** Tires Plus!My President is Black wrote:
well there is only very minor rust because it came from a snowy area, its just in the bottom of the back right door in the crack, which im not concerned about i already got it to look 10x betters, and the electrical is only the a/c and thats only what "tires plus" said so im gonna try taking it to a a/c specific shop.
I would love to sell and buy a 94-96 the only problem is ive never found any in my area at all and the only couple i have they're firm on a very high price way out of my budget.
I'll be those engineers designed the car to last 100k with very little maintenance then be discarded. They're probably think we're idiots trying to get 200k+ out of these cars. After all this was a long time ago when it was designed. I remember when I was growing up if a car had 80k on the odometer it was time to rebuilt the engine.oldmako wrote:You must admit that putting those damn things in THIS engine was monstrously stupid, and the guy has valid bias. They are clearly the achilles heel of the earlier cars and for no good reason other than for Nissan to save about 30 cents during production. Sure, 30 cents times a gazillion units it a ton of coin and all that, but plastic is notoriously life limited, particularly when it lives where there are large temp fluctuations.