Could you weigh one for me?It would cost you nothing, I would pay for the postage.I think it was around $10 for the 2 caliper bolts that GQJay sent me.I suppose you could take one to a post office near you, and get them to give you a quote, or search online for a postage cost calculator?USPS shows $4.95 for surface mail envelope, weighing 4 oz. (That would take 4-6 weeks to arrive, but I don't care about that)Jesda wrote:I have chills. I would totally rock this!
Ozzie: How much would it cost me to ship you my dead injector?
I'm using a large frame T-76 with a .96 hot side. The turbo is good for at least 930 hp, so I have room for expanding my power goals.qsiguy wrote: What turbo are you using, what are your tuning plans, etc.
Fender louvers are not really feasible on the G50. The strut towers are huge and will block any air flow out of the engine bay. The only options are either hood louvers, a reverse hood scoop or a hood vent.maxnix wrote:Interesting. Wonder how the airflow will be managed for the elevated under hood temperatures. Hood or fender louvers?
Oh hell, if its that cheap just give me your address.ozzie! wrote:Could you weigh one for me?It would cost you nothing, I would pay for the postage.I think it was around $10 for the 2 caliper bolts that GQJay sent me.I suppose you could take one to a post office near you, and get them to give you a quote, or search online for a postage cost calculator?USPS shows $4.95 for surface mail envelope, weighing 4 oz. (That would take 4-6 weeks to arrive, but I don't care about that)
Say what, Mr. Q45.org?elwesso wrote:Not sure why you had to start a seperate website AND forum, but whatever suits you I suppose.
The problem with using a 60-1 is that at low boost, say 7 psi, it will be very inefficient on a 4.5 liter engine. The T-76 on the other hand will be in its sweet spot at 7 psi on the same engine. The bigger turbo is just more efficient. Plus, with the T-76 there is room to make more power later.ScottJackson wrote:T76 seems a bit overkill, but I don't have room to talk since I haven't done anything toward turboing my Q. I'm gonna be going with something more in the range of a 60-1.
If you cannot see the difference between a SUPPORTING informational site and a possibly competing FORUM, i dont see how you can criticize either.maxnix wrote:Say what, Mr. Q45.org?
Not only is youth wasted upon the young, but apparently so is free time.
Sijoko, how far away from completion are you? Seems to me from reading that you only have a few more things to tidy up, some management, and then you should be up and running.sijoko wrote:The problem with using a 60-1 is that at low boost, say 7 psi, it will be very inefficient on a 4.5 liter engine. The T-76 on the other hand will be in its sweet spot at 7 psi on the same engine. The bigger turbo is just more efficient. Plus, with the T-76 there is room to make more power later.
Whow, dude. Did we pull an all nighter? NICO needs a supporting site?elwesso wrote:If you cannot see the difference between a SUPPORTING informational site and a possibly competing FORUM, i dont see how you can criticize either.
Interesting this is all done with standard cast high static compression pistons. The only problem with non-fuel spray is it displaces air and fuel and thus reduces the possible amount of power.sijoko wrote:The problem with using a 60-1 is that at low boost, say 7 psi, it will be very inefficient on a 4.5 liter engine. The T-76 on the other hand will be in its sweet spot at 7 psi on the same engine. The bigger turbo is just more efficient. Plus, with the T-76 there is room to make more power later.
maxnix wrote:Interesting this is all done with standard cast high static compression pistons.
Not so - Water or methanol injection on this motor would allow sijoko to increase both boost and timing. Both bring combustibility into the equation (water brings O2, methanol is combustible in its own right).maxnix wrote:The only problem with non-fuel spray is it displaces air and fuel and thus reduces the possible amount of power.
Actually, three years ago when the site was created, NICO absolutely needed it. And when we switched to ZeroForum's worthless search engine, the site was more useful than ever. Now that Wes has updated the NICO articles section with tons of really great stuff, it isn't that important.Its also become stale because I stopped caring. I'm shopping around for an M30, Miata, Z32, E34, E30, Seville, Fleetwood... anything else, really.maxnix wrote:Whow, dude. Did we pull an all nighter? NICO needs a supporting site?
Holy crap that's a broad spectrum of cars. You have the same issue I have, a love for almost all cars and a want to own them. You may be financially better off then I am, because there's no way I could buy more then one of those right now. You should add the Lincoln MK VIII to your list though.Jesda wrote:
I'm shopping around for an M30, Miata, Z32, E34, E30, Seville, Fleetwood... anything else, really.
Now, back on topic...
Having the kit boost activated is far safer and easier then using a WOT switch. Since you'll make lots of boost under loaded conditions without being in WOT. If it's a single stage setup, then a Hobbs switch is your best option. That way whenever you hit your predetermined boost level the alcohol/water will be available.qsiguy wrote:I will be using methanol injection but most likely only when I switch to the higher boost. I will be making a dual boost controller so I can switch it from the inside and will probably just tie the methanol to that switch and have a microswitch on the throttle to activate at WOT.