96Qowner wrote:3.) If it doesn't require an equal amount of petroleum to produce, and therefore also release twice the global warming emissions as petroleum alone.
Once all the farm machinery runs on soy diesel or ethanol, and the corn dryers run on solar and/or wind, as well as the distilleries, and if we find a way to produce fertilizers from something other than petroleum, etc. ... then it might make some sense. As it is, it's just a waste of resources we can't afford.
And there isn't enough cropland in this country to supply all the ethanol feed product we'd need to replace petroleum in vehicles.
Google is a great resource. Maybe legislators and their staffs could avail themselves of it sometime, and learn something. Oh, and Google might help the mass media news "professionals", too - odd that they never seem to have heard of the problems with trying to replace gasoline with ethanol.
Let's get down to it though, there are more ways to produce energy than just corn. There are current studies out there that show common prarie grass has potential, water is a huge potential and the technology is already there with that option, and Canada is sitting on the largest source of common near surface coal on the planet.
Last I checked we don't have any issues with Canada, we like Canada and they are probably the 1st place we should be looking to assist us in energy resources, for obvious reasons.
But let's face the facts, we're looking to the government and big business to take the lead on this issue and that is obviously the worst source for forward thinking there is in this country.