Mark Linkous wrote:At least with the Logan's, they claim, that the speakers put out less static electricity than a television.
That is good! The Acoustat speaker cloth was white, and I was always cleaning them regularly too ... dust would settle on them in a heartbeat. Martin Logans have typically had black cloth ... probably less of a problem in this regard.
Mark Linkous wrote:Whether or not this is propaganda, I do not know. The new gen Logan's are relatively smaller with a powered woofer starting at the midbass.
True! Most of the Martin Logan line has usually had a sub-woofer of some sort built in, as I recall. But I am not certain of that.
Mark Linkous wrote:I have always wanted a full range panel, but, the size and expense is insane.
Yup! The Acoustat 2+2, 1+1 and others (like the Speakerlab 3) full-range electrostatics were very large, but sounded awesome. I ended up with the Acoustat 3 because they were a bit smaller in height (my old house did not fit the model 2+2 at 94" tall), although were still sorta full-range - dropped off below about 40 to 50Hz while the largers ones would go down to about 30 Hz very cleanly.
Eventually, I added the Velodyne ULD-18, partly because the excursion of the panel at low frequencies would occasionally cause panel contact with the high-voltage grid - no arcing, but it sounded poor at high volumes. The sub-woofer blended in beautifully (separate amp in the Velodyne) that it was an excellent way to go! I set it to cross-over at 80Hz or so, and that made the Acoustat's even better sounding overall.
Z