It's all been done and posted.p0onsta wrote:Sorry, double post. but after driving the new setup for 2 days, I've come to the conclusion that 248(-2.5)/232 is indeed slower all over the place, until it goes past 5k. None of the dips in power that were noticed by others in 248/232 were there, but the nicer top end was. I really miss my bottom end though, so next I will try 248(+2.5)/232 and hopefully it will do what 240/232 does, only better: power all over the rev range.
Has there been any others who've tried this? Is anybody reading this thread anymore? DJPantsSpecR? BigVinnie?
Modified by p0onsta at 8:17 PM 3/19/2008
search a bit, zerothread/199832
there is a lot of information out there on this.